JVC HA-FW01 - The New Top End Wood Driver IEM (2017)
Jan 5, 2017 at 6:27 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 780

jwbrent

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Nov 2, 2008
Posts
6,429
Likes
6,826
Location
California
I recently purchased the HA-FW01 from Amazon ($449), and now that I have over 100 hours of play time, I think I can accurately share my observations on how these sound, especially compared to the HA-FX1100 which I also own. I should mention for those new to the JVC wood IEMs, these are made for the Japanese market, so all promotional materials are typically in Japanese.





First, a link that has been Google translated here. Lots of good information to be found including some graphics showing the difference between the FW01 and the FX1100.

For those who are unfamiliar with the JVC woodies, in 2008, JVC/Victor released the HP-FX500, the first IEM that used wood fiber as the diaphragm material. I purchased these for about $200 and really liked them a lot, much more than the Denon AH-C700 that was quite popular at the time. As shigzeo—a noted member here—relayed in his early review, "The FX500 sound signature could be summed up in three words: 'rich and thick.'"

Yes, that they were—they had a wonderful tonal quality to them, non fatiguing, and the beautiful wood body only made my attraction to them greater. They were followed up a couple years later by the HA-FX700 which improved on many aspects of its predecessor's design. I also owned them and found they were a worthy upgrade over the FX500. The one shortcoming of both of these models was the length of the non-detachable cable, about .85m.

Around 3 years ago, JVC released a lineup of new woodies, the HA-FX650, HA-FX750, and the top model at the time, the excellent HA-FX850. I bought the FX850 and found it to be superior to the FX700. This lineup has proven to be very popular and an allegiance of woodie fans has developed here on Head-Fi. Also, JVC addressed the cable length issue by using the now standard 1.2m length, and on the FX850, they added a detachable cable.

Which brings us to the HA-FX1100/FX1200. These were released shortly after the before mentioned lineup and are considered the pinnacle of the JVC wood driver design with low end performance that any basshead would grin about. Once again, I bought the FX1100 and was happy with the change. The one noted difference with the cable on these was the use of 6 nines (99.9999%) pure copper, the first time JVC placed any apparent attention on the sound quality of its cable.

HA-FW01

The HA-FW01 is a departure from the tonal character of JVC's previous woodies. Some FX850/1100 owners have commented on how the bass bleeds into the lower mids, muffling the sound of this crucial area of the frequency range. Since my use was primarily outdoors, I wasn't too bothered by this; during in home listening sessions I would use EQ to correct for this characteristic.

On its website, JVC writes about the importance of resonance control: they use 4 different elements made from wood, aluminum, brass, and stainless steel to control the resonance that is inherent in all IEMs. Resonance that isn't well controlled can intrude into the overall sound, reducing clarity, imaging, low level detail retrieval, and introducing fatigue with extended listening. If one ever wondered why high quality loudspeakers are so heavy and use different materials—sometimes exotic—for cabinet construction, resonance control is the answer.

I hear this improvement in the lack of resonance when I listen to my FW01. The bass is way better controlled compared to the FX1100, it's more detailed, less one note sounding, yet still rich in timbre. The lower midrange is no longer clouded, rather, male vocals are reproduced with such a clarity that vocal expressions are easily discerned. Female vocals, too, come though with a beautiful purity, less edginess, less fatigue. The trebles are extended, and low level detail retrieval is easily heard—those quiet musical expressions such as the decay on instruments that get lost in the noise floor of lesser designs.

I should mention the gear I'm using for my evaluation: I own an Astell&Kern AK240 Stainless Steel as my transport connected with a Penon Audio 4-nines pure silver OTG cable going to the fabulous Chord Mojo DAC/amplifier. I use the Spiral Dot tips included with the FW01 and the stock cable, which, by the way, is not made from 6 nines copper; there is no mention about the quality of the conductors on JVC's website. Strange, a backwards step from the FX1100, and a possible route for improving the sound further with an upgrade.

In addition to the improved resonance control, the FW01 uses a thinner diaphragm with an updated voice coil design thus enabling greater speed in handling transients. I hear this as better dynamics compared to the FX1100 ... sometimes I've been struck by the dynamic impact throughout the frequency range. I'm sure this improvement in the drivers correlates to the improved bass performance on the FW01.

Another improvement JVC employed on the FW01 is separating the ground paths between the two channels. No, the FW01 isn't balanced out of the box, but JVC (as well as after-market cable suppliers) offers an optional cable that makes it so; those who prefer the sound from this kind of connection (and have an amplifier that supports balanced operation), well, go for it. Personally, I haven't played around that much with this type of hookup in my portable audio adventures.

Summing up, I now own a pair of IEMs that I feel are reference grade. It's been a long journey for me going back to the FX500 and I've enjoyed the ride immensely with each successive design, but the FW01, in my mind, has taken the art of dynamic driver IEMs to a new level. Needless to say, I'm very happy with my purchase. Listening to my library of music is now an adventure with further surprises to await me.

Items of Note

The FW01 is made in Japan, a feature that began with the FX500 and FX700, but changed with the introduction of the FX650/750/850/1100 series (China).

The pictured case on the website has changed: JVC is now embossed on the cover, not Class-S.

Some have commented on the new shiny black front piece suggesting it made the design cheap looking; it is gloss black but there are metallic flakes that, in my opinion, add a touch of elegance.

For whatever reason, I always preferred using Comply T400 foam tips with my previous JVC woodies, but on the FW01, I like the sound of the Spiral Dot tips much better.

The overall length of the FW01 is shorter than the FX1100, so now you can walk around outside without looking like a relative of Frankenstein. :wink:

I've always liked the little bump on the left cable of the JVC woodies; it really makes it much easier to identify the channels in the dark. Additionally, there are now color coded bands for right and left channel on each earpiece where the cable connects.

The metal accents on the wood body are a pale rose gold. Also, there are tiny ridges on the back aluminum cap, but they are shallower than the FX1100, an improvement in maintaining its beautiful finish. Previous JVC woodies used this as a design element, but the soft nature of aluminum made it easy to scar these up.

For those who have an extreme attention to build quality, as I do, the FW01 is a luxury product.
 
Last edited:
Jan 6, 2017 at 2:32 AM Post #6 of 780
Thank you for the observation on FW01,
 
"Summing up, I now own a pair of IEMs that I feel are reference grade."
 
agree with you, the point I wanna make is, these FW01 is not far from the expensive TOTL iems out there (technically is not far behind, but on par on fun factor),  they are really of the reference grade like JWbrent said. 
 
Jan 6, 2017 at 3:34 AM Post #7 of 780
Th
I recently purchased the HA-FW01 from Amazon ($449), and now that I have over 100 hours of play time, I think I can accurately share my observations on how these sound, especially compared to the HA-FX1100 which I also own. I should mention for those new to the JVC wood IEMs, these are made for the Japanese market, so all promotional materials are typically in Japanese.
 
 

 
 
First, a couple links that have been Google translated: here & here. Lots of good information to be found including some graphics showing the differences between the FW01 and the FX1100.
 
For those who are unfamiliar with the JVC woodies, in 2008, JVC/Victor released the HP-FX500, the first IEM that used wood fiber as the diaphragm material. I purchased these for about $200 and really liked them a lot, much more than the Denon AH-C700 that was quite popular at the time. As shigzeo—a noted member here—relayed in his early review, "The FX500 sound signature could be summed up in three words: 'rich and thick'."
 
Yes, that they were—they had a wonderful tonal quality to them, non fatiguing, and the beautiful wood body only made my attraction to them greater. They were followed up a couple years later by the HA-FX700 which improved on many aspects of its predecessor's design. I also owned them and found they were a worthy upgrade over the FX500. The one shortcoming of both of these models was the length of the non-detachable cable, about .85m.
 
Around 3 years ago, JVC released a lineup of new woodies, the HA-FX650, HA-FX750, and the top model at the time, the excellent HA-FX850. I bought the FX850 and found it to be superior to the FX700. This lineup has proven to be very popular and an allegiance of woodie fans has developed here on Head-Fi. Also, JVC addressed the cable length issue by using the now standard 1.2m length, and on the FX850, they added a detachable cable. 
 
Which brings us to the HA-FX1100/FX1200. These were released shortly after the before mentioned lineup and are considered the pinnacle of the JVC wood driver design with low end performance that any basshead would grin about. Once again, I bought the FX1100 and was happy with the change. The one noted difference with the cable on these was the use of 6 nines (99.9999%) pure copper, the first time JVC placed any apparent attention on the sound quality of its cable.
 
HA-FW01
 
The HA-FW01 is a departure from the tonal character of JVC's previous woodies. Some FX850/1100 owners have commented on how the bass bleeds into the lower mids, muffling the sound of this crucial area of the frequency range. Since my use was primarily outdoors, I wasn't too bothered by this; during in home listening sessions I would use EQ to correct for this characteristic.
 
On its website, JVC writes about the importance of resonance control: they use 4 different elements made from wood, aluminum, brass, and stainless steel to control the resonance that is inherent in all IEMs. Resonance that isn't well controlled can intrude into the overall sound, reducing clarity, imaging, low level detail retrieval, and fostering fatigue with extended listening. If one ever wondered why high quality loudspeakers are so heavy and use different materials—sometimes exotic—for cabinet construction, resonance control is the answer.
 
I hear this improvement in the lack of resonance when I listen to my FW01. The bass is way better controlled compared to the FX1100, it's more detailed, less one note sounding, yet still rich in timbre. The lower midrange is no longer clouded, rather, male vocals are reproduced with such a clarity that vocal expressions are easily discerned. Female vocals, too, come though with a beautiful purity, less edginess, less fatigue. The trebles are extended, and low level detail retrieval is easily heard—those quiet musical expressions such as the decay on instruments that get lost in the noise floor of lesser designs.
 
I should mention the gear I'm using for my evaluation: I own an Astell&Kern AK240 Stainless Steel as my transport connected with a Penon Audio 4 nines pure silver OTG cable going to the fabulous Chord Mojo DAC/amplifier. I use the Spiral Dot tips included with the FW01 and the stock cable, which, by the way, is not made from 6 nines copper; there is no mention about the quality of the conductors on JVC's website. Strange, a backwards step from the FX1100, and a possible route for improving the sound further with an upgrade.
 
In addition to the improved resonance control, the FW01 uses a thinner diaphragm with an updated voice coil design, thus enabling greater speed in handling transients. I hear this as better dynamics compared to the FX1100 ... sometimes I've been struck by the dynamic impact throughout the frequency range. I'm sure this improvement in the drivers correlates to the improved bass performance on the FW01.
 
Another improvement JVC employed on the FW01 is separating the ground paths between the two channels. No, the FW01 isn't balanced out of the box, but JVC (as well as after-market cable suppliers) offers an optional cable that makes it so; those who prefer the sound from this kind of connection (and have an amplifier that supports balanced operation), well, go for it. Personally, I haven't played around that much with this type of hookup in my portable audio adventures, so I won't comment on this further.
 
Summing up, I now own a pair of IEMs that I feel are reference grade. It's been a long journey for me going back to the FX500 and I've enjoyed the ride immensely with each successive design, but the FW01, in my mind, has taken the art of dynamic driver IEMs to a new level. Needless to say, I'm very happy with my purchase. Listening to my library of music is now an adventure with further surprises to await me.
 
Items of Note
 
The FW01 is made in Japan, a feature that began with the FX500 and FX700, but changed with the introduction of the FX650/750/850/1100 series (China).
 
The pictured case on the website has changed: JVC is now embossed on the cover, not Class-S.
 
Some have commented on the new shiny black front piece suggesting it made the design cheap looking; it is gloss black but there are metallic flakes that, in my opinion, add a touch of elegance.
 
For whatever reason, I always preferred using Comply T400 foam tips with my previous JVC woodies, but on the FW01, I like the sound of the Spiral Dot tips much better.
 
The overall length of the FW01 is shorter than the FX1100, so now you can walk around outside without looking like a relative of Frankenstein.
 
I've always liked the little bump on the left cable of the JVC woodies; it really makes it much easier to identify the channels in the dark. Additionally, there are now color coded bands for right and left channel on each earpiece where the cable connects.
 
The metal accents on the wood body are a pale rose gold. Also, there are no tiny ridges on the back aluminum cap. Previous JVC woodies used this as a design element, but the soft nature of aluminum made it easy to scar these up.
 
For those who have an extreme attention to build quality, as I do, the FW01 is a luxury product.


Thanks for an excellent impression. I too am a fan of jvc woodies. I have the fx850 and fx1200. I am looking to buy the fw01 especially after reading your expereinces with the fw01. I have always thought the previous woodies could do with more resolution for vocals and highs. I am currently pairing my other woodies with silver cable, tightens up the bass and express details a tad better. What would recommend for an aftermarket cable on the fw01 silver or copper or hybrid?

Cheers
 
Jan 6, 2017 at 9:07 AM Post #8 of 780
x
 
Jan 6, 2017 at 9:38 AM Post #9 of 780
I think  the pure silver will be better than the hybrid or copper, because I've found the FW01 darker than Fx1200 (I use foam with fx1200, but spinfit with FW01).
Me myself, I use the tralucent Uber cable and Effect audio Mars, the Uber cable sound best to my ear, it makes the FW1 sound like a full size Can and match  well with the brightness of the QP1R . The mars will be the one of these two you like more  according to your need. There are a lot of good silver cable out there such as those dhc sp4 or 8, twag V2 clipse (cheap secondhand price now) , TwagV3 (silver) or silver widow , a lot of choice indeed
 

Questyle QP1R+ FW-01 and Tralucent Uber 
 

I use this tip (came with the my ES5 Demo ) when I use the Uber cable, I dont know if the size of the hole of the tip (wider than the spinfit hole) affect the sound,  I've just found with this silicon tip, the sound is more open.
 

I use spinfit CP100 when I use the Mars cable, because the cable itself is a  bright cable. Spinfit sounds warmer to my ear than the tip above
 
Jan 6, 2017 at 2:15 PM Post #10 of 780
Thanks for an excellent impression. I too am a fan of jvc woodies. I have the fx850 and fx1200. I am looking to buy the fw01 especially after reading your expereinces with the fw01. I have always thought the previous woodies could do with more resolution for vocals and highs. I am currently pairing my other woodies with silver cable, tightens up the bass and express details a tad better. What would recommend for an aftermarket cable on the fw01 silver or copper or hybrid?

Cheers

 
Thank you for your post. I haven't completed the burn-in process on my FW01s yet, so I'm reluctant to recommend one type of cable over another, but if I were to do so now, I'd say a pure silver (not silver plated copper) cable. My view may change over the next couple of weeks, and I'll be sure to update my thoughts ...
 
Jan 6, 2017 at 10:19 PM Post #12 of 780
I think they should be given a minimum of 500hrs

I'm waiting for my to reach the 500 hours too, the sound may change so we can say how they sound exacly
 
Jan 6, 2017 at 10:52 PM Post #13 of 780
I have a ways to go. There is an upper midrange glare that I expect will resolve itself with more time.
 
Jan 7, 2017 at 2:49 AM Post #14 of 780
Thanks for the suggestions..
I may just take the plunge on the fw01. Ive been using an effect audio thor silver II+ for the few weeks with fx1200 and its great. Probly buy another for the fw01. Its a great cable match for the fx1200 and the flexibility of the wires is very comfortable.
 
Jan 7, 2017 at 6:24 AM Post #15 of 780
FW01 is indeed superior compared to the previous flagship JVC. FW01 have wider soundstage that is well suit for classical music.
For me, I always listen to female vocals and I find the mid centric nature of FW02 and also narrow soundstage makes female vocals very focused and intoxicating.

gMVX9Ok.jpg
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top