Moonwalker
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2001
- Posts
- 367
- Likes
- 17
Hi everyone!
Last week I went to shop where the Stax dealer awaited me and let me listen to 3 different Stax phones. I listened to SR-003 (standard connector version of the 001's), SR-202 Basic and SR-404 Signature phones (EARSPEAKERS, of course
)
I was using the SRM-313 solid state amp all the time, connected to the entry-level MD I know best, SONY 510 MD deck.
This was chosen because I wanted to hear the Stax's like I would be at my home, not having the ultra-expensive SACD ES players or 200 SACD discs. I had some MD with some pop/rock on them, the music I listen to about 80 percent of my listening time. Nothing excellent, Smokie live, Nazareth best of and 1 Czech singer I know very good. (J. Schelinger)
I sat to the low, comfortable black soft chair, and having fresh water and some peanuts, I was left alone by the salesman and spend almost 1 hour of listening.
The SR-003 sounded good, very nice for an earphone, but after some time, I decided they aren't for me. I was FEELING them in my ears, no matter how much I tried to get them comfortable. When they were comfortable, I was hearing little bass, and too much treble, and when they sounded OK, my ears started hurting a little. Soundwise, great detail, not much space around the head, nice midrange, overall faster than HD600, but still earphones.
Next time I plugged the 404 into the 313 amp and was surprised how flimsy they are. They produced a lot screechy plasticky sounds, the pads were a bit loose from the plastic frame, looking like the glue holding them together has dried up. When I put them on my head they feel quite heavy, surely more than my HD600. Details were nice, speed too, both a bit more than the HD600, bass goes deep, not as deep as on the HD600, midrange a bit sterile but still detailed (and a bit cold), trebles are nice if a bit prominent. Covering the frame by the hands makes a big difference on the sound - really open design! Everything was more forward than on HD600 except bass region. More recording hiss, more breathing of the singers, more metal sounding. To me, it was a bit less lifelike, like the blue-lit hospital room: everything seems clean, sterile and hard, but you don't like to live here for a long time. Resume: 404 are great resolving tool for listening for flaws of the recording, not for pleasure.
Finally I put 202 to test. Even more flimsy looking, cheap!!! plastic, hard cable, not so soft pads and uglier headband. 1 piece of the outer frame was broken, making me think it's not very durable material used on them. Much more plasticky sounds, every time you move or adjust them you get some KRRR, FSS, EEEK etc. Sound was not very diffferent from the 404, surprisingly, at least on the same 313 amp. Maybe a bit farther from the nature, more synthetic sound especially on the midrange, but only a bit more. They are almost as good as the 404, but the build quality on 202, 303 and 404 earspeakers is very poor, especially on the 202.
They are completely different phones, especially in Europe not mass marketed and they look like it. They are hi-end cans, without a doubt, but like all hi-end gear, they are sometimes too different to satisfy most people.
I was tempted to purchase them, but now I'm happy I listened to them and decided I can live happily without them.
Any comments?
Your
Moonwalker
Last week I went to shop where the Stax dealer awaited me and let me listen to 3 different Stax phones. I listened to SR-003 (standard connector version of the 001's), SR-202 Basic and SR-404 Signature phones (EARSPEAKERS, of course
I was using the SRM-313 solid state amp all the time, connected to the entry-level MD I know best, SONY 510 MD deck.
This was chosen because I wanted to hear the Stax's like I would be at my home, not having the ultra-expensive SACD ES players or 200 SACD discs. I had some MD with some pop/rock on them, the music I listen to about 80 percent of my listening time. Nothing excellent, Smokie live, Nazareth best of and 1 Czech singer I know very good. (J. Schelinger)
I sat to the low, comfortable black soft chair, and having fresh water and some peanuts, I was left alone by the salesman and spend almost 1 hour of listening.
The SR-003 sounded good, very nice for an earphone, but after some time, I decided they aren't for me. I was FEELING them in my ears, no matter how much I tried to get them comfortable. When they were comfortable, I was hearing little bass, and too much treble, and when they sounded OK, my ears started hurting a little. Soundwise, great detail, not much space around the head, nice midrange, overall faster than HD600, but still earphones.
Next time I plugged the 404 into the 313 amp and was surprised how flimsy they are. They produced a lot screechy plasticky sounds, the pads were a bit loose from the plastic frame, looking like the glue holding them together has dried up. When I put them on my head they feel quite heavy, surely more than my HD600. Details were nice, speed too, both a bit more than the HD600, bass goes deep, not as deep as on the HD600, midrange a bit sterile but still detailed (and a bit cold), trebles are nice if a bit prominent. Covering the frame by the hands makes a big difference on the sound - really open design! Everything was more forward than on HD600 except bass region. More recording hiss, more breathing of the singers, more metal sounding. To me, it was a bit less lifelike, like the blue-lit hospital room: everything seems clean, sterile and hard, but you don't like to live here for a long time. Resume: 404 are great resolving tool for listening for flaws of the recording, not for pleasure.
Finally I put 202 to test. Even more flimsy looking, cheap!!! plastic, hard cable, not so soft pads and uglier headband. 1 piece of the outer frame was broken, making me think it's not very durable material used on them. Much more plasticky sounds, every time you move or adjust them you get some KRRR, FSS, EEEK etc. Sound was not very diffferent from the 404, surprisingly, at least on the same 313 amp. Maybe a bit farther from the nature, more synthetic sound especially on the midrange, but only a bit more. They are almost as good as the 404, but the build quality on 202, 303 and 404 earspeakers is very poor, especially on the 202.
They are completely different phones, especially in Europe not mass marketed and they look like it. They are hi-end cans, without a doubt, but like all hi-end gear, they are sometimes too different to satisfy most people.
I was tempted to purchase them, but now I'm happy I listened to them and decided I can live happily without them.
Any comments?
Your
Moonwalker