Just kinda curious, are Beats really that bad?
post-7611571
Thread Starter
Post #1 of 30

Shuriko

New Head-Fier
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Joined
May 26, 2010
Posts
12
Likes
0
I know they're overpriced but are they actually low-quality headphones like skullcandies or something? If you had to compare them to another headphone what'd be the closest comparison?
 
     Share This Post       
post-7611639
Post #2 of 30

Mad Max

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Nov 12, 2009
Messages
7,453
Reaction score
288
Location
USA
Joined
Nov 12, 2009
Location
USA
Posts
7,453
Likes
288
lol
Some Sony earbuds?
 
I've no idea, but if you are considering something better, portable, and bassy, then read up on ATH-ESW9, ATH-ES10, HD25-1 (or its even bassier little brother, HD25-SP), or T50p.  They'll get you started in this hobby. 

 
     Share This Post       
post-7611642
Post #3 of 30

Kukuk

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Nov 20, 2009
Messages
2,118
Reaction score
618
Joined
Nov 20, 2009
Posts
2,118
Likes
618
I really do think they are downright bad. I know a lot of people claim they are "decent, but overpriced", but "decent" would not be a word I would use to describe them at any price point. Their mids just suffer too much, and their highs are nothing short of unpleasant. They really are just a drag to listen to. I think something like the Koss KSC75 are superior in just about every way, with the exception of bass quantity.
 
     Share This Post       
post-7611662
Post #4 of 30

Ishcabible

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jan 19, 2009
Messages
6,331
Reaction score
519
Joined
Jan 19, 2009
Posts
6,331
Likes
519
I don't think they're terrible for what they are, which is a colored headphone meant to be inaccurate for the sake of typical consumer pleasure. All things considered, I prefer my modded Koss Portapros' sound signature, but if you're into that stuff...

I think they're at the same level as the original around ear Triports. Comparing them to anything we like is unfair because even the most "fun" popular headphone here still strives for some accuracy.
 
     Share This Post       
post-7611678
Post #5 of 30

sidel

1000+ Head-Fier
Joined
May 28, 2011
Messages
1,498
Reaction score
37
Joined
May 28, 2011
Posts
1,498
Likes
37
They're aimed at an entirely different demographic.  It's really impossible to put a definitive answer to this because it's essentially an item that derives its own value from its price tag.  It's a fashion item, and as a bonus it's possible to play normal-consumer-acceptable music through it.
 
     Share This Post       
post-7611697
Post #6 of 30

Uncle Erik

Uncle Exotic
Joined
Mar 18, 2006
Messages
22,597
Reaction score
494
Joined
Mar 18, 2006
Posts
22,597
Likes
494
Yes, they are that bad.

They add bass where it isn't present on the recording and that drowns out the mids and highs.

Just get a good pair of headphones. We can help you with that.
 
     Share This Post       
post-7611847
Post #7 of 30

sh4w

New Head-Fier
Joined
May 23, 2011
Messages
24
Reaction score
10
Joined
May 23, 2011
Posts
24
Likes
10
I auditioned a pair of 279€ and another pair of 379€ beats yesterday (no idea which beats versions they were). It was in an electronics store and I had my iPhone and my E11 (EQ off) with me.
As soon as the music started playing the only thing I was hearing was "BOOM BOOM BOOM". As you can probably tell the bass was earthshaking.
Mids were very muddy and highs were recessed as hell (could barely hear cymbals)...

certainly not worth 279 and 379€, more like 30-50€

oh yea and the funny thing was, unlike all the sennheisers and other headphone brands the beats had "incredible sound" written on their pricetags by employees lol, maybe they meant "incredibly bad sound" :D
 
     Share This Post       
post-7611921
Post #8 of 30

Chris_Himself

Member of the Trade: HPL Audio Cables
Joined
Jun 6, 2007
Messages
3,169
Reaction score
72
Joined
Jun 6, 2007
Posts
3,169
Likes
72
I had someone say my Grados were much better even though part of me disagreed due to their overall bass presentation and what it must sound like to noobs. Shrug.
 
Then again I had someone tell me my Grados looked really cool (SR-80i)
 
     Share This Post       
post-7611940
Post #9 of 30

ostewart

Reviewer at Sound Perfection Reviews
Joined
Feb 1, 2011
Messages
5,674
Reaction score
1,743
Joined
Feb 1, 2011
Posts
5,674
Likes
1,743
Age
27
i had another listening session to some beats studio yesterday, and yes they are that bad. First i tried some acoustic dashboard confessional, terrible muddy mess with very recessed mids and bass everywhere, then some paramore, exactly the same, huge bass everywhere, shrill highs and recessed mids. I let my mum try them with the display music (bass heavy music) then showed her the price, she was shocked, she thought they sounded really bad and that her PX100 II sounded better. I much prefer my AKG K518 DJ's than the beats, at least they work well with more genreserday, and yes they are that bad. First i tried some acoustic dashboard confessional, terrible muddy mess with very recessed mids and bass everywhere, then some paramore, exactly the same, huge bass everywhere, shrill highs and recessed mids. I let my mum try them with the display music (bass heavy music) then showed her the price, she was shocked, she thought they sounded really bad and that her PX100 II sounded better. I much prefer my AKG K518 DJ's than the beats, at least they work well with more genres
 
     Share This Post       
post-7611942
Post #10 of 30

ostewart

Reviewer at Sound Perfection Reviews
Joined
Feb 1, 2011
Messages
5,674
Reaction score
1,743
Joined
Feb 1, 2011
Posts
5,674
Likes
1,743
Age
27
sorry for the double text nd whatever, my phone messes it up sometimes.
 
     Share This Post       
post-7627728
Post #11 of 30

droido256

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Sep 8, 2010
Messages
558
Reaction score
163
Joined
Sep 8, 2010
Posts
558
Likes
163
Yes they really are as bad as people say they are. Bloated overpumped bad quality bass, and nothing else really. Not to mention they break more than a yugo.
As for comparison I'd have to compare them to the skullcandy skullcrushers. Actually I liked the skullcrushers more(yes it makes me sick to say that I actually like the skullcrushers vs anything but the junk that came with my ipod). Trying out the beats was the worst listening experience I've ever had the misfortune of putting my ears through, and I've used maxell 5 dollar headphones before.
 
     Share This Post       
post-7627754
Post #12 of 30

Player1josh46

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
173
Reaction score
20
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Posts
173
Likes
20
I'm going to my friends house to compare his beats studio to my ath m50s and i wanted to know if they will be a clear difference on which sounds better overall. Note that my m50s have the foam removal mod and i put electrical tape(another mod) under the pads to add more comfort. With these things in mind, will my ath M50s have anything over his beats studio's?
 
     Share This Post       
post-7627888
Post #13 of 30

TMRaven

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
7,282
Reaction score
989
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Posts
7,282
Likes
989
The Beats are decent, I don't know why anybody would consider them plain bad.  It's just another over-exegerration of many that you'd find in the world of audiophilia if you ask me.
 
Keep in mind this site deals with hi-fidelity, where the ultimate goal is to produce something as accurate and realistic as possible to the real deal.  So, right off the bat, the Beats would get a terrible rep for their exaggerated mid-bass bloat.  They are decently fun headphones to listen to however, and their form factor and styling are also another thing that must be taken into consideration for their target audience.  
 
     Share This Post       
post-7628028
Post #14 of 30

Kukuk

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Nov 20, 2009
Messages
2,118
Reaction score
618
Joined
Nov 20, 2009
Posts
2,118
Likes
618


Quote:
The Beats are decent, I don't know why anybody would consider them plain bad.  It's just another over-exegerration of many that you'd find in the world of audiophilia if you ask me.
 
Keep in mind this site deals with hi-fidelity, where the ultimate goal is to produce something as accurate and realistic as possible to the real deal.  So, right off the bat, the Beats would get a terrible rep for their exaggerated mid-bass bloat.  They are decently fun headphones to listen to however, and their form factor and styling are also another thing that must be taken into consideration for their target audience.  


Honestly, I really do think they are just terrible. Their mids are just so, so recessed, with their upper-mids and highs way too spiked up. It sounds like it's forcing all the instruments and vocals to one extreme of the spectrum or the other. I just can't accept this as even "decent" at any price range.
 
     Share This Post       
post-7628033
Post #15 of 30

swbf2cheater

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
5,045
Reaction score
120
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Posts
5,045
Likes
120
Well, the Dbi Pro 700 is only $40 bucks and upstage the $250-300 beats in every single way, shape and form.  So, yes.  I would say BAD is a light term to use when describing them.  
 
     Share This Post       

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top