Jumping into minidisc--should I get a home recorder?
Sep 21, 2003 at 7:06 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 21

Patrickhat2001

1000+ Head-Fier
Joined
May 13, 2003
Posts
1,068
Likes
17
I wish to try out the minidisc format and I'm confused as to how I should go about recording minidiscs in SP mode. I see many head-fi members recommending a home recorder deck if someone wishes to record in SP mode. Does a home recorder offer better sound quality over just using a portable minidisc player/recorder to do the recording? If so would the cheaper home decks such as the Sony MDS-JE480 still offer better sound quality?

Thanks,

Patrickhat2001
 
Sep 21, 2003 at 7:28 AM Post #2 of 21
Ironically I've never compared SP recording made on my portable to the home unit. I just take it for granted that the home deck will sound better based on comments from others here.

For me, it was really a matter of convenience. It's rather easy to record in SP on a deck. With a portable, I find NetMD recordings easy to make, but real time recordings are a bit of a pain on a portable.

If I was new to MD and wanted to get into the format. I think I'd get an MZ-N610 so I'd have the radio for portable listening as well and I'd also get the MXD-400 so I could do high speed SP dubs.
 
Sep 21, 2003 at 9:37 AM Post #3 of 21
I didn't find a big difference between making SP recordings with my PCDP->TOS-link->MDR set-up as opposed to using my MXD-D5C deck, but I think the D5C gives slightly better-sounding results and it's much easier to create the recordings.

If you didn't plan on making any field (live) recordings with a portable MD recorder, you wold be further ahead to get a deck plus an MD player.
 
Sep 21, 2003 at 1:41 PM Post #4 of 21
Fro my own personal experience, I've found that the higher end home decks do produce a better quality recording than say one from a PCDP.

I've been using a SONY MDS-JA30Es for around 5 years now and have yet to hear any better SP recordings. It's been fed with a ROTEL RDD980 Transport and latterly i've been using a KRELL MD10.

I know this is overkill but it is really astonishing to hear the quality sounds that can be produced with such a rig.



The JA30ES is perhaps a little long in the tooth now and the JA333Es and the JA555es are possibly better machines, but I comment to much having not heard them personally.



For a lower budget setup the JB940 is a really nice home deck and has all the features that you will need.
 
Sep 21, 2003 at 4:42 PM Post #5 of 21
Quote:

Originally posted by Trawlerman
For a lower budget setup the JB940 is a really nice home deck and has all the features that you will need.


I have one of these and really like it a lot. I picked it up on eBay for under $150 (can't remember exactly) and the thing works flawlessly.
 
Sep 21, 2003 at 8:59 PM Post #6 of 21
I haven't been able to pick up any difference in sound between identical ATRAC version recordings (Type R) made on a R909 portable and JE530 deck. Perhaps a high end deck may be slightly better but I don't expect the difference to be easily audible, especially in a portable environment. If you are planning to connect your MD to speaker amps however a deck offers much better sond, since none of taodays MD portables have a true line out. A deck also makes tittling and editing easier.
 
Sep 21, 2003 at 9:22 PM Post #7 of 21
I was browsing the ASK website and found this. I asked the guys who I'm doing some work for and they're going to try and get one to me to look over.


http://www.askdirect.co.uk/uview?cal...540&topcatid=7


I have no idea about the quality, but if previous CMT systems are anything to go by (I've had the M100 and the M700) it can't be bad. As a partner to a player it seems ideal. It has both Net MD and 4x MD-CD (in SP) dubbing.
 
Sep 21, 2003 at 10:02 PM Post #8 of 21
Quote:

Originally posted by blr
I haven't been able to pick up any difference in sound between identical ATRAC version recordings (Type R) made on a R909 portable and JE530 deck. Perhaps a high end deck may be slightly better but I don't expect the difference to be easily audible, especially in a portable environment. If you are planning to connect your MD to speaker amps however a deck offers much better sond, since none of taodays MD portables have a true line out. A deck also makes tittling and editing easier.


I actually find titling in Simple Burner to be more effective than using my deck.
 
Sep 22, 2003 at 5:03 PM Post #10 of 21
what makes that particular model so bad?


appar111
 
Aug 27, 2009 at 9:19 AM Post #12 of 21
i have been using portables for a lot of years now ,the best built one was the mzr50.i now own 3-mznh900/mznh1/mzrh1 and they are all superb machines for making recordings.i intend to add a headphone amp shortly.does anyone have any recommendations.headphones are sennheiser px100.
 
Aug 27, 2009 at 1:15 PM Post #13 of 21
As good as MD sounds, I personally would not spend any money on MD equipment unless it was HI-MD. If I remember correctly, there are no HI-MD home decks. If you could get a home deck for free or very, very cheap, then sure why not.
 
Aug 27, 2009 at 1:27 PM Post #14 of 21
Quote:

Originally Posted by madnanny1 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
i have been using portables for a lot of years now ,the best built one was the mzr50.i now own 3-mznh900/mznh1/mzrh1 and they are all superb machines for making recordings.i intend to add a headphone amp shortly.does anyone have any recommendations.headphones are sennheiser px100.


Welcome to head-fi!!!
biggrin.gif


And a bit of friendly advice:

Better to start a new thread, rather than resurrecting a 6 year old one.
 
Aug 27, 2009 at 1:45 PM Post #15 of 21
hello blue meanie unfortunately minidisc has been superceded with mp3/ipod i will still use this medium as my main source of music playback. i have only had one experience with full size minidisc machines-----technics top of the range. not any better than my portables.need help with h/phone amps ie there are so many out there to choose from

madnanny1
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top