boodi
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2001
- Posts
- 7,481
- Likes
- 2,219
Saw a copy of "Stand Up" - digitally remastered - today , and got it ( stand up is one of my favourites of all time and of '70 ) ..
..the album is wonderful , but sound quality of recording is far from being good - it sounds harsh at times , timbre of instruments is quite muddy , bit too much melted together , and on ...
..so as I alredy said I thought to get the 2002 Chrysalis digitally remastered version today ( DIGITALLY REMASTERED written with capital letters on covers ) ..
disaster , and I threw away some money literally ..
The sound quality of the digitally remastered version is way worse then the original ..
was almost very confused at first.. ( I went cleaning my ears too !
I didn't trust what I was hearing .. )
*What?*
then I saw..
remastering and labelling as remasters was commercial operation -only- . They should label things this way - remastered as a commercial operation only .
They brightened up the sound and xompressed the sound frq.s to my ears ( which is very bad thing btw ) - results are very discernible and horrible , the sound has lost some magics , is harsh and flat now where it was more clean before ..
bleah..
things like this shouldn't happen ( this was a clear exemple as Stand Up is a '70 well known classic which could have needed some work to re-shine , and some work could have been done on it for sure ) and should also be reported somehow
[size=xx-small]I'm sure what I'm talking about , there's some evidence the quality of the original is better .. [/size]
I'll eventually report it in Amazon or in rateyourmusic.com , mphhh...
*very disgusted*
..the album is wonderful , but sound quality of recording is far from being good - it sounds harsh at times , timbre of instruments is quite muddy , bit too much melted together , and on ...
..so as I alredy said I thought to get the 2002 Chrysalis digitally remastered version today ( DIGITALLY REMASTERED written with capital letters on covers ) ..
disaster , and I threw away some money literally ..
The sound quality of the digitally remastered version is way worse then the original ..


*What?*
then I saw..
remastering and labelling as remasters was commercial operation -only- . They should label things this way - remastered as a commercial operation only .
They brightened up the sound and xompressed the sound frq.s to my ears ( which is very bad thing btw ) - results are very discernible and horrible , the sound has lost some magics , is harsh and flat now where it was more clean before ..
bleah..
things like this shouldn't happen ( this was a clear exemple as Stand Up is a '70 well known classic which could have needed some work to re-shine , and some work could have been done on it for sure ) and should also be reported somehow
[size=xx-small]I'm sure what I'm talking about , there's some evidence the quality of the original is better .. [/size]
I'll eventually report it in Amazon or in rateyourmusic.com , mphhh...
*very disgusted*