audionewbi
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2010
- Posts
- 10,610
- Likes
- 6,040
The CL1 has all my attention, the mini XLR means I can make all the plugs I want for it .
I think he was using the lowest gain setting and the L1 has three. I thought it could drive headphones up to 600 ohms.
I know the circumstances under which you listened to these were not ideal. However, could you give us an idea of how the iSine(10 or 20) and the CL1 sound and how they compare? Like you, I'm leaning heavily towards the CL1 but the iSine is still interesting, albeit wonky looking. Thanks!
Don't forget the CL1 from at the show was only 85% finished, the tuning isn't final yet. So there's not much sense in comparing both pre prod units.
That being said, CL1 was more refined and detailed/clear, while iSine had more bass with full bodied mids and and bass. Treble on the CL1 was further extended. If I had to describe both in one word it would be refined for RHA and Big (sound +shape) for the iSine
CL1s look gorgeous, just worried about the treble.
CL1s look gorgeous, just worried about the treble.
Why does the treble concern you? Are you worried about too much treble, or not enough? Please explain.
I had the Ma750 & T20, while the treble is lively and detailed its also very harsh.
If they found a way to fix that then awesome. Sennheiser had to use the Helmholtz resonator in the IE800 to keep the lively treble from being harsh and tiring and it worked really really well.
I understand that the T20 comes with three filters (bass emphasis, neutral, treble emphasis) that allow you to tailor the sound to your liking. Was the treble still harsh even with the bass emphasis filter in place?
That DACAMP L1 may get me to finally upgrade from my iBasso P4 Warbler for transportable, and a more ergonomic solution than my beloved MoJo.
Agreed. It would be nice if the @RHA Team
would supply us with some details about its design, so we can determine why it is better than alternatives...