Is it a bit smooth sounding? I tend to not get that black between notes or quite that solidity form android based player in general but they can be very open and good/friendly sounding. The detail is there but the it's almost like there's too much harmonic for the fundamental. Hard to describe but not the solidity available from say, the LPG. I also think the DAC chip the LPG uses is commonly more solid sounding. I'm asking here. Not trying to project a character without hearing it but every android based player I've had hasn't hit as hard as a couple using their own OS or linux. Doesn't mean I haven't enjoyed them and still have a couple.
I had almost finished a long post answering this, and a tiny Windows glitch 'ate' my post. I do not type that well or quickly so, ARRRRGGGGHHHHHH!!!
That said, I am using the Campfire Vega almost exclusively now, and they are quite natural sounding, but do favor the instruments over the acoustic a bit. WIth the LPG, the combo can be, on occasion, a bit too "challenging/demanding for a more relaxed listen. The QP1R is also very good sounding, but the Vega is just too bass-heavy with it- not flabby, just a bit too much in the mix.
Heard an Opus1 at RMAF, so I thought the Opus2 might be a nice antidote to my considering the Sony 1Z, vs the A&K 320 vs the 380 vs the 380cu vs with or without an A&K amp..... The Opus2 sounds good so far, and has about 15 hours on it, most burning in on my desk, the rest listening. So, the following is all a provisional report:
So far, it is more "relaxed" sounding than the LPG or Q, it is more "open" sounding. That is, it has a more mid-hall sound, so you hear the acoustic as well as the instruments. - Things are spaced further apart front to back, and a bit more left to right. Tonal balance with the Vega is very good, but perhaps a bit bass-shy (maybe just coming from the others, which may have a touch too much. Not sure yet. The instrumental timbres are very good, and it does not have the Sabre glare. It also seems to slightly soften, smooth out leading edges of note - it does not "hit" as hard as the LPG. The individual instruments are not as palpable and holographic as on the PAW and Q. I have always found that audio systems (especially speaker-based) either give big stage, or palpable images, but not both, until you get to the very top-tier gear that gives you "everything". Same here. When you attend an acoustic performance, the tonal balance and the ratio of direct/reflected sound changes a bit. What does not change is that there is really not a sound stage or imaging - the instruments are just 'there' an a primal kind of way-you just sense it. It's that kind of thing that the (modified) LPG does, and the Q, to a large extent, that, so far at least, the Opus2 isn't quite there. IN other word, it needs to become a bit less "Memorex" and more "Ella". But so does almost all portable hifi gear.....
Maybe next time I'll make it much shorter and just say "I agree with Goodvibes". lol