Interesting article on interconnects

Apr 14, 2007 at 5:27 AM Post #2 of 6
Apr 14, 2007 at 6:11 AM Post #3 of 6
"Stealth Indra

The raw materials and extensive manual labor involved in this unusual construction mean an astronomical price. Is it worth the price? That we don't know. What we do know is that the moment you fire this cable up, price becomes a non-issue.


The rest of the world becomes a non-issue as well. Without a doubt, this cable is the ultimate in this group. It applies a new superlative meaning to "disappearance". The inter-note silence, airiness and dynamics, the inner gestalt of the music is portrayed in such a way that you have to surrender all rationale."

6Moon reviews often read like second-year literature student wrote a love letter to his girlfriend.

For reference, the Stealth Indra costs $5750 for a meter pair
smily_headphones1.gif
 
Apr 15, 2007 at 12:45 AM Post #4 of 6
6moons is hit or miss for me. there's a wealth of information on sensitive speakers and associated equipment, and mr. ebaen does a good job reviewing the occasional "lifestyle" piece; there's also a wealth of pure bs. however, i assure you, if any of us had the job of reviewing esoteric audio equipment and all of our opinions were there for the world to see, people would find things to poke fun at. nobody's perfect.

if you really want something to laugh at... check out michael fremer's reviews for stereophile. i have never seen him praise anything besides megabuck stuff like the ongaku... or the $350,000 wavac amp.

edit:

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Potis
Whether I'm at Baltimore's Meyerhoff Symphony Hall, various Rock concert venues or even at the country club where I make my living and regularly get to hear all manner of live bands and orchestras, I find that I get regular doses of live music to keep me honest as a reviewer. And if there's one thing I learned a long time ago, it's that there's no such thing as the absolute sound. Sit in one seat of any concert hall and take an aural snapshot of what you're hearing. Now move ten seats away. Take another snapshot and compare it to the first. You'll be looking at two very different pictures. Now move to the other side of the hall. Take another picture. It won't look as though it was taken in the same hall. Let's not even get into how those compare to what you'd hear at the city's other hall, the Lyric.


That's not to say that if you were to place a microphone at any one of those seats, make a recording and take it home, the goal shouldn't be to have what you hear match as closely as possible that what you heard in the hall. It should. But when judging gear by recordings whose birth I did not witness, there's little point in judging them against some unfathomable standard of absolute truth. Not where it concerns characteristics such as tonal balance or even bass authority just to name two. Give me a speaker -- any speaker -- and I'll find you a seat in the hall where you'll hear comparable bass and another where you won't. There's that much variation within a hall.



there's a good quote from a 6moons review. i especially enjoy it because that's basically what i've always thought about the audiophile goal of "reproducing a live event". while i don't enjoy all of the reviews on esoteric cables and... urgh... cd treatments, there's still some great content.
 
Apr 15, 2007 at 1:11 AM Post #5 of 6
That reads to me as simply an excuse for not bothering to calibrate the frequency response of a system. Just because you can't know the absolute response, it doesn't mean you shouldn't strive to get an accurate relative balance.

See ya
Steve
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top