Inside the Q10. What makes them tick.
Nov 13, 2008 at 2:49 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 9

kool bubba ice

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jun 16, 2006
Posts
8,547
Likes
83
QUALIA

Got this from a web site full of ignoramus' that think only an idiot would pay 3,300 for a pair of great, great, headphones.. This was in 05.. & was sold by audiocubes..
ph34r.gif
 
Nov 13, 2008 at 3:01 AM Post #3 of 9

Duggeh

Indeed
Joined
May 9, 2005
Posts
9,618
Likes
39
it was 010 for the model number, Q for the series. Just to point out that the title is a slight misnomer.
 
Nov 13, 2008 at 3:05 AM Post #4 of 9

003

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Oct 4, 2005
Posts
4,688
Likes
14
Well, if you do go to the 010 page, it has a slide that shows a cut out view of one of the earcups and the special properties of its magnet.
 
Nov 13, 2008 at 4:09 PM Post #6 of 9

krmathis

Head-Fi's Most Prolific Poster
Joined
Jan 13, 2004
Posts
34,761
Likes
76
Thanks for sharing!

The specifications was all new to me.
picture1jc9.png
 
Nov 13, 2008 at 5:24 PM Post #7 of 9

tintin47

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Oct 16, 2008
Posts
2,007
Likes
13
Nice. I do have a question though. What the hell is the point having a frequency response above 25khz? I never get that, but 120khz? What? Why?
 
Nov 13, 2008 at 5:35 PM Post #8 of 9

asebastian0

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Nov 6, 2005
Posts
211
Likes
12
All signals traverse a single diaphragm. Vibrations/sound in the upper register affect sound in the lower register. These were designed to go with SACD systems which produce sound beyond 100kHZ, naturally they would need to accurately portray signals across the entire spectrum.
 
Nov 13, 2008 at 5:53 PM Post #9 of 9

tintin47

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Oct 16, 2008
Posts
2,007
Likes
13
good point. Didn't think about the SACD angle.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top