iFi audio Pro iDSD (Official) - NEW Firmware - MQA and more.
post-14501345
Post #541 of 1,528

iFi audio

Sponsor: iFi Audio
Joined
Mar 20, 2013
Messages
5,864
Reaction score
2,969
Location
Location: HQ in the UK, but spread far and wide.
Joined
Mar 20, 2013
Location
Location: HQ in the UK, but spread far and wide.
Posts
5,864
Likes
2,969
Website
ifi-audio.com
I think I can now answer this. For one, the 3D and XBass are irreplaceable. And then, iCan's dynamics are just unmatched by the iDSD, IMHO. Truly amazing combo.
Good to hear!
 
     Share This Post       
  • Like
Reactions: datasyd
post-14503057
Post #542 of 1,528

iFi audio

Sponsor: iFi Audio
Joined
Mar 20, 2013
Messages
5,864
Reaction score
2,969
Location
Location: HQ in the UK, but spread far and wide.
Joined
Mar 20, 2013
Location
Location: HQ in the UK, but spread far and wide.
Posts
5,864
Likes
2,969
Website
ifi-audio.com
Folks, just a quick bit of nfo: if you're going to attend this year's RMAF in Denver (Colorado), at our booth we'll update firmware of any non-Pro iDSD machine by iFi audio to 5.3C. Why? Most people can get this done on their own, but if you're in need of assistance and would like to get familiar with our GTO filter, we're there for you! Please bring your hardware to our booth and we'll do the rest!
 
Last edited:
     Share This Post       
post-14503163
Post #543 of 1,528

webmi

Head-Fier
Joined
Aug 17, 2018
Messages
71
Reaction score
40
Location
Germany
Joined
Aug 17, 2018
Location
Germany
Posts
71
Likes
40
Is there a ETA for the MQA Update on the PRO iDSD ?
 
     Share This Post       
post-14503442
Post #544 of 1,528

flyte3333

Previously known as Em2016
Joined
Jan 21, 2017
Messages
1,205
Reaction score
385
Joined
Jan 21, 2017
Posts
1,205
Likes
385
at our booth we'll update firmware of any non-Pro iDSD machine by iFi audio to 5.3C.
Hi iFi, I know you mentioned non-Pro iDSD firmware there but just a friendly request to please leave non-Pro iDSD related announcements to other threads, just to avoid the confusion that the 5.3C firmware announcement caused earlier in this same thread.
 
Last edited:
     Share This Post       
  • Like
Reactions: Alaskagriz
post-14503595
Post #545 of 1,528

SuperRex

Head-Fier
Joined
Aug 20, 2018
Messages
66
Reaction score
2
Location
USA
Joined
Aug 20, 2018
Location
USA
Posts
66
Likes
2
Somebody may has asked this, but what is the best way to hook the iCan up with iDSD. RCA? What about the power cable? Included in one of them? My iDSD is on the way, and someone suggested to get the iCAN for Susvara.
 
     Share This Post       
post-14503617
Post #546 of 1,528

SuperRex

Head-Fier
Joined
Aug 20, 2018
Messages
66
Reaction score
2
Location
USA
Joined
Aug 20, 2018
Location
USA
Posts
66
Likes
2
Btw, if I decided to stack these two together, can someone suggest a cheaper rack solution? The Pro iRack is insanely expensive.
 
     Share This Post       
post-14503624
Post #547 of 1,528

gordec

1000+ Head-Fier
Joined
Aug 14, 2006
Messages
1,212
Reaction score
552
Joined
Aug 14, 2006
Posts
1,212
Likes
552
Somebody may has asked this, but what is the best way to hook the iCan up with iDSD. RCA? What about the power cable? Included in one of them? My iDSD is on the way, and someone suggested to get the iCAN for Susvara.
I use chain in my link. I can't hear a huge difference between rca or XLR using good quality silver interconnects so use whatever. I'm not a huge fan of pro ican for Susvara as McIntosh sounds so much better but other Susvara owners love it so you probably will.
 
     Share This Post       
post-14503642
Post #548 of 1,528

SuperRex

Head-Fier
Joined
Aug 20, 2018
Messages
66
Reaction score
2
Location
USA
Joined
Aug 20, 2018
Location
USA
Posts
66
Likes
2
I use chain in my link. I can't hear a huge difference between rca or XLR using good quality silver interconnects so use whatever. I'm not a huge fan of pro ican for Susvara as McIntosh sounds so much better but other Susvara owners love it so you probably will.
Sorry, I'm new here, what do you mean by chain? The McIntosh probably worth triple the iCAN, right? Any cheaper, or similar to iCAN price range amp suggestions? Big Thanks!!!
 
     Share This Post       
post-14503851
Post #549 of 1,528

doggiehowser

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Feb 20, 2008
Messages
157
Reaction score
19
Joined
Feb 20, 2008
Posts
157
Likes
19
     Share This Post       
post-14504825
Post #550 of 1,528

iFi audio

Sponsor: iFi Audio
Joined
Mar 20, 2013
Messages
5,864
Reaction score
2,969
Location
Location: HQ in the UK, but spread far and wide.
Joined
Mar 20, 2013
Location
Location: HQ in the UK, but spread far and wide.
Posts
5,864
Likes
2,969
Website
ifi-audio.com
     Share This Post       
post-14504853
Post #551 of 1,528

iFi audio

Sponsor: iFi Audio
Joined
Mar 20, 2013
Messages
5,864
Reaction score
2,969
Location
Location: HQ in the UK, but spread far and wide.
Joined
Mar 20, 2013
Location
Location: HQ in the UK, but spread far and wide.
Posts
5,864
Likes
2,969
Website
ifi-audio.com
iFi audio - The GTO filter
Part 4/4 - Introducing the iFi GTO™ Digital Filter

Transients and Digital Filters

Digital filters introduce time-domain distortions that are unavoidable and a result of the inherent functional principle of digital filters. Digital filters are formed from delay-lines with so-called ‘taps’ usually at one audio sample intervals. Summing the delayed signals with varying gain, positive and negative, forms the filter function. Time-domain distortion, just as amplitude domain distortion is accumulated along the recording and playback chain and cannot be removed unless its exact nature is known.

1.jpg

Among others, the mathematical consequences of this filtering have been described by J. Willard Gibbs after whom the Gibbs phenomenon is named. A square-wave filtered perfectly with a filter that allows only the fundamental to pass, will be a sinewave. Transient distortion, however, will be very high. If a square-wave is filtered but not with a perfect filter that only allows the fundamental to pass, ringing is observed. No filtering restores the perfect square-wave.

2.gif

Optimising Digital Filters for transients

Considering the responses of the human ear, a digital filter can claim to offer a transient response distortion that does not materially alter the perception of music should have a transient response that has been completed in under 700μs and be free of pre-ringing.

3.png

Such a filter could be an asymmetrical FIR filter with no more than 32 taps at 44.1/48kHz sample rate and no more than 64 taps at 88.2/96kHz sample rate, which is precisely what iFi have implemented as GTO Filter.

4.jpg

Given the ‘Haas Window’ within which reverb or ringing is integrated into the main arrival is agreed to be at minimum 5ms (some debate remains to the actual number), one may expect filters that require more than 5ms to complete their impulse response (or have in excess of around 220 Taps at 44.1kHz sample rate) to have the potential to be significantly audible as alteration.

5.png

By contrast a 5μs transient resolving ability of the ear would require a sample rate of around 200kHz to ensure a transient response, while a 20μs transient resolving ability of the ear would require a sample rate of over 50kHz, with a good middle ground represented by a 88.2/96kHz sample rate.

6.png

The above suggests that at 44.1kHz sample rate digital audio lacks time domain resolution to be transparent and the common ‘long’ symmetrical FIR digital filter will have the potential to cause audible problems. It is thus desirable to use a higher sample rate and ‘short’ asymmetrical digital filters to ensure recording and playback are audibly transparent.

At this point in time even higher sample rate recordings tend to utilise “long” symmetrical FIR Filters, so their benefit is diluted. That said, if we know the filter response applied at the time of recording, the time-domain distortion in the recording could in theory be reversed and replaced by one that is not audible, this action is asserted for the complete end to end MQA coding system promoted by MQA Ltd, which is now supported by all current iFi products.

For recordings not available in MQA derived from analogue Masters or genuine high-resolution digital masters with a known provenance, selecting iFi’s GTO filter presents the highest possible fidelity.

How iFi has implemented the GTO™ Digital Filter

A digital filter must be implemented somewhere, perhaps on an FPGA like the Xilinx Spartan 6 as used in the Pro iDSD, a DSP Chip like an Analogue Devices Sharc or Blackfin. Recent developments on the XMOS Platform have led to our becoming very familiar with offerings from the new XCore200 and the onboard DSP capabilities baked-in.

In the Pro iDSD we choose to use the XILINX Spartan 6 FPGA which also performs the DSD 1024 remastering, simply because the 16-Core XMOS is substantially loaded already.

7.jpg

Using any option requiring dedicated hardware would mean this filter can only be made available on products in development at higher price-points as FPGAs or DSP chips sufficiently capable are costly or on products using the xCore-200, which is on-board of the Pro iDSD.

GTO Trickle-down

Unlike the xCore-200 series which include built-in DSP capabilities, implementing MQA on xCore-100 required the ground-up design of a DSP engine. With the DSP engine now available, our natural inclination was to have our new filter baked onto the XMOS Firmware.

Technical assistance came from an unexpected source; MQA. Using very different filter parameters as part of a more complex system including the decoder section requires serious DSP chops. The implementation of MQA rendering on the original xCore-100 series XMOS processors widely used in the iFi products required extensive DSP work.

This took some extra work, and some fine-tuning of resource allocation, however with the version 5.3C of our XMOS firmware we now offer this new, Global Transient Optimised digital filter to all our customers, including just about all our legacy products, as an alternate option to the filters implemented in the DAC chip that apply for version 5.30 and before.

Technical backdrop

The ‘Gibbs Transient Optimised’ filter was developed by iFi according to our specifications in conjunction with the MQA team. We must make clear that GTO is not directly related to filter types used by MQA, it is not “MQA through the backdoor”, but instead what we feel is the optimum solution for the playback of digital audio that has not undergone the MQA process. We would like to thank MQA for their technical assistance in integrating this into our firmware.
 
     Share This Post       
post-14504926
Post #552 of 1,528

youurayy

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Aug 7, 2016
Messages
336
Reaction score
86
Joined
Aug 7, 2016
Posts
336
Likes
86
The ‘Gibbs Transient Optimised’ filter was developed by iFi according to our specifications in conjunction with the MQA team. We must make clear that GTO is not directly related to filter types used by MQA, it is not “MQA through the backdoor”, but instead what we feel is the optimum solution for the playback of digital audio that has not undergone the MQA process. We would like to thank MQA for their technical assistance in integrating this into our firmware.
Wow, and congrats!

An MQA tech doc link (inb4 thread turns savage): https://www.computeraudiophile.com/ca/ca-academy/A-Comprehensive-Q-A-With-MQA-s-Bob-Stuart/
 
     Share This Post       
post-14504999
Post #553 of 1,528

Whitigir

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Oct 14, 2013
Messages
18,563
Reaction score
12,128
Joined
Oct 14, 2013
Posts
18,563
Likes
12,128
So, what is the osicilliators being used inside this device ?
 
     Share This Post       
post-14505118
Post #554 of 1,528
Joined
Jan 4, 2008
Messages
16,949
Reaction score
9,405
Location
Fukuoka, Japan
Joined
Jan 4, 2008
Location
Fukuoka, Japan
Posts
16,949
Likes
9,405
Website
www.hear.reviews
Square waves don't exist in music, or in nature. They only cause filters to ring as they contain out-of-band frequencies, which the ringing indicates.
 
     Share This Post       
post-14505142
Post #555 of 1,528

Whitigir

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Oct 14, 2013
Messages
18,563
Reaction score
12,128
Joined
Oct 14, 2013
Posts
18,563
Likes
12,128
It’s very confusing when Chord is aiming for longer Taps, where IFI aims for lower taps...but whatever work and sounds good. I a, in for DSD512 and dsd1024, but what are the clocks specifications again ?
 
     Share This Post       

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 1, Guests: 1)

Top