Does anyone use custom tips with the ER4SR? I was wondering if anything changes compared to regular tips. I imagine them being more comfortable but not sure if sound changes.
A few other users chimed in on this earlier but I figured I'd give my 2 Cents. I think the sound quality of Custom Fit sleeves are best summarized by this comment Don Wilson of Etymotic made on one of
udauda's/Rin's blog posts:
donw said:
.The point with Custom fit, is to get a consistent, and comfortable seal. There are some slight frequency response trade offs, but for the most part they are not enough to worry about. You can find big changes in the insertion depth, and sometimes even the eartip used. The early ER-4 foam eartips had a horn due to the resources I had available to design the insert.
I've had my ER4XRs for the past month or so with both the small flange tips and the custom sleeves made for my old ER4, and when I've tested them with
Joe Bloggs'
equalization tones I've found both tips to sound incredibly linear from about 35 Hz and up. I found the differences between the tri-flange and custom tips to be
slight with the custom tips delivering a
little less impact in the bass region below 100 Hz. I definitely think there's some statistical differences to be found between the frequency responses of both tips but I don't think it automatically translates to major "clinical"/practical significance for most people. The comfort, solid seal, and secure hold in my ears from the custom fit sleeves are definitely worth the extra investment. I had mine done by
Sensaphonics and I had an overall good experience buying my Custom Fit sleeves from them.
And since I'm already talking about the ER4XR here I might as well give a mini-review. The linearity in the perceived frequency response simply
amazed me as I didn't really find any apparent frequency peaks or dips that I normally have to EQ on other headphones. I was an owner of the ER4 PT which I mainly used with the official S adapter which I found to be lacking in the bass region around 150 HZ and below from what I remember when I tested them with Joe Bloggs' EQ tones a little while back. When I heard about a new ER4 I knew I had to go with the XR model offering increased bass response
smack dab in the region I found lacking. I personally couldn't even consider the SR version if the bass response was going to be similar to the ER4S. Handling the XR for the first time, I was impressed with the upgraded build quality which feels solidly put together and much more professional looking. I only wish the Left and Right indicators stood out a bit more. Using the XR, I was satisfied to hear less microphonics through the cable; not completely elminated but
greatly reduced from the older ER4 models.
As for the audio quality, like I've mentioned earlier, the true neutrality is amazing! The increased bass of the XR bumps the perceived frequency response for me into
truly neutral territory; especially in comparison to the ER4S which is great everywhere else along the frequency spectrum except for the anemic bass. The neutrality of the XR along with the already superb detail and seal carried over from the ER4S has been a great boon for me in my line of work as a Front of House audio engineer. And when doing some live field recordings I've been able to put together some decent enough mixes using just the XR. The neutral sound signature pairs really well with the relatively flat tuning of the sound systems I get to work with and the noise isolation allows me to hone in on details that would normally be lost in the background noise blaring from the sound system when I use headphones. So overall I'm very satisfied with the ER4XR and the only IEM upgrade I can see myself going up to would be some sort of future, reasonably priced version of Shure's KSE1500 electrostatic IEM.