Hi,
could you share your schematics? I am thinking how to possibly adapt these for ER4P
http://www.falstad.com/circuit/circ...YMgGBBd1WmAwGBC7SiYukVEYAHsmW8VJAFt1DnIBdEGEA
I hope that the simulator looks understandable enough for you, the rightmost 45ohm resistor represents the ER4SR driver, the green graph represents the input, and the red graph represents the output to the driver
of note is that I have since removed the diodes and two-thirds of the resistors compared to when I took the picture, the diodes were there to protect the capacitors from reverse voltage but someone on the forums said that they weren't necessary, and each resistor is 100ohm so by going from 3 parallel resistors to 2, I have increased the resistance from 33.3ohm to 50ohm...it gives a higher ratio of bass to the sound and adjusting the potentiometers will have a bigger effect on the level of bass to each driver, but it does mean that I have to run my amp at full blast to get a normal volume out of them now, but I could use my ER4SR with even cheap amplifiers and there wouldn't be any background hiss
you will notice that 2 terminals of the inductor/transformer are not used, any current flowing on this side of the inductor/transformer at a certain frequency will also increase the current on the main side , so by adding more components on this side such as capacitors and more inductors, it would be possible to shape the frequency response of the inductor/transformer
Overall , as it is now, this is changing the frequency response in other ways than just increasing the bass and removing hiss... it seems to be attenuating the high frequencies in a way which makes everything sound 'distant' , I am suspecting that the resistors and potentiometers I am using have some inherent inductance to them which is causing some unwanted filtering of the high end
(or maybe a balanced armature driver is more complicated than a simple resistor with the same value as its impedance)
But, between the bass boost, and being in control of centering the bass response, this is an acceptable tradeoff for me...
As far as adapting to the ER4P, the only thing I can think of is to change the resistors and potentiometer, from 50 ohms (which I am using for my ER4SR which has 45 ohms impedance), to 33.3 ohms (to keep it proportional with the ER4P's 27 ohm impedance) ...