iBasso SR1 semi open Headphone. Limited production.
Oct 12, 2018 at 9:16 AM Post #16 of 1,047
Having heard these at the New York show they are easily worth twice the price. Slightly warmer than the focal Utopia and not quite as open sounding they nevertheless presented very high quality image of the sound.

As someone who is not familiar with the Focal Utopia, what is the general sound signature like?

For example: Mid-forward with tight bass?

I just bought a Focal Elegia too. Really wish I knew these were coming soon. Can't wait to hear some detailed impressions!

Edit: What are the connectors the headphone uses? Almost looks like MMCX from the internals diagram.
 
Last edited:
Oct 12, 2018 at 12:08 PM Post #22 of 1,047
As someone who is not familiar with the Focal Utopia, what is the general sound signature like?

Really a unique sound. As semi-opens, they do what the Nighthawk / owl failed miserably to do. Have a dense full sounding middle, with great sub bass extension and treble detail. Yet without boominess and no harshness anywhere. I had my trusty portable pair, the Sony MDR-1A with Meze 99 pads which reduce the mid bass bloom, increase the lowest sub bass and open up the sound stage and give your ears more space. I like the W response these have, with not only extended but smooth highs, and some of the best sub bass ever but not lacking in mids, plus having a 3D sound stage (I'm talking about the Sony MDR-1A with Meze 99 pads). That said these sounded better in every way. Spaciousness was for my ears, about equal. Sub bass as good, if a bit more controlled (amazing for a semi-open) and the highs were as detailed, yet even smoother. Mids were fuller overall, it was more engaging to me. Despite this fullness, the spacious sound meant everything was properly spread out, and panned. A very wide, yet correct and natural sound, I'll rarely hear both in one. If they build that sound tech into a set with less fancy design, less heavy parts, and better reach for the ear cups, they'd have a winner. 1 or 2 extra clicks in length on each cup would have made them a perfect fit all the way extended. A simple yet comfy and effective band that reaches far enough as the Sony MDR-1A has can work. Pads like the Meze 99 (oval vs. round) would give them that reach and comfort. Cost cutting on visuals with the simpler band design could make them lighter, and less expensive. If that happened there'd not be a single headphone out there that can compete with something like that in its price bracket. Still hard to compare them to anything, as they've broken such new ground here.
 
Last edited:
Oct 12, 2018 at 12:29 PM Post #23 of 1,047
Really a unique sound. As semi-opens, they do what the Nighthawk / owl failed miserably to do. Have a dense full sounding middle, with great sub bass extension and treble detail. Yet without boominess and no harshness anywhere. I had my trusty portable pair, the Sony MDR-1A with Meze 99 pads which reduce the mid bass bloom, increase the lowest sub bass and open up the sound stage and give your ears more space. I like the W response these have, with not only extended but smooth highs, and some of the best sub bass ever but not lacking in mids, plus having a 3D sound stage (I'm talking about the Sony MDR-1A with Meze 99 pads). That said these sounded better in every way. Spaciousness was for my ears, about equal. Sub bass as good, if a bit more controlled (amazing for a semi-open) and the highs were as detailed, yet even smoother. Mids were fuller overall, it was more engaging to me. Despite this fullness, the spacious sound meant everything was properly spread out, and panned. A very wide, yet correct and natural sound, I'll rarely hear both in one. If they build that sound tech into a set with less fancy design, less heavy parts, and better reach for the ear cups, they'd have a winner. 1 or 2 extra clicks in length on each cup would have made them a perfect fit all the way extended. A simple yet comfy and effective band that reaches far enough as the Sony MDR-1A has can work. Pads like the Meze 99 (oval vs. round) would give them that reach and comfort. Cost cutting on visuals with the simpler band design could make them lighter, and less expensive. If that happened there'd not be a single headphone out there that can compete with something like that in its price bracket. Still hard to compare them to anything, as they've broken such new ground here.

As this is an Ibasso SR1 thread please questions and comments the Focals Headphones in their own thread! Hope they still exist?! :grimacing:
 
Oct 12, 2018 at 12:59 PM Post #24 of 1,047
As this is an Ibasso SR1 thread please questions and comments the Focals Headphones in their own thread! Hope they still exist?! :grimacing:

I think your misunderstanding. We're both talking about the SR1. I've just never heard the Utopia, so I couldn't relate to jamato8's comparison.
 
Oct 12, 2018 at 1:53 PM Post #25 of 1,047
I think your misunderstanding. We're both talking about the SR1. I've just never heard the Utopia, so I couldn't relate to jamato8's comparison.

I apologize if I have misunderstood you.
That is why I have ordered the SR1 as soon as I can because in my experience each time Ibasso has new “limited” products they are selling fast and you could not luckily have a chance to get one.:wink:
 
Oct 12, 2018 at 2:27 PM Post #26 of 1,047
Took me about an hour from hearing of its release to hitting the order button, not missing out on this one. Missed out on the DX200Ti but managed to pick one up a few weeks ago, can’t wait to hear these two together :smile_phones:
 
Oct 12, 2018 at 9:42 PM Post #28 of 1,047
The rings on the SR1 are machined anodized aluminum. The 4 side supports are a special acoustical plastic to dampen any resonance. Everything is extremely solid and constructed for sound.
 
iBasso Stay updated on iBasso at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
 
http://www.ibasso.com/ paul@ibasso.com

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top