RustyGates
100+ Head-Fier
I think the 10 elements against 20 is a contributor to Dave being more transparent than TT2; and this is for a number of rather complex reasons! Both 10e and 20e have balanced transitions in the pulse array; this is the primary reason why pulse array is so master clock jitter insensitive.
Of course a volume control can never be bit perfect, unless it is set to 1.00000.... But the concept that is useful is does the volume control change the sound quality; and to do this one has to ensure that the signal within the audio bandwidth is identical apart from gain changes; and I achieve this with an advanced noise shaper. This sounds much more transparent than just adding dither, and I can test the performance by using a -301 dB 6 kHz test signal, and checking that the digital module will reproduce a -301 dB signal perfectly with zero amplitude errors; and the Verilog volume module does indeed do this. All my code has to pass this test now; and it is a crazy level of perfection, but listening tests has revealed that we can actually hear the slightest small signal error, no matter how small.
So no not bit perfect; but within the audio bandwidth no distortion or noise added (to a -350dB accuracy).
Thanks again @Rob Watts
Here's a subjective, non technical question since I am considering the M-Scaler. In your listening experience, would you say the TT2 + Hugo M-Scaler sounded better than the DAVE stand-alone? Did the M-Scaler make up for the lower pulse array element count in the TT2?