Thats a load of garbage that the guy wrote. I completely agree with the top comment on that "blog"
this is the top comment.
"How did you perform these tests? As far as I know, no software LDAC decoder implementation is available. I suppose you disassembled an LDAC-supported headphones or a speaker, and recorded the output.
This is not a correct method for comparison testing, because modern Bluetooth DAC SoCs have additional features like equalizer, compander and more, configured per-codec.
You've tested the audio path of the exact device, not the codec itself. I don't say your results are totally incorrect, but take that into account."
There are a few drawbacks listed on the page I have linked earlier, including cut off frequency, THD, non compliance to A2DP profile, prone to interfere etc. The first comment you quoted questioned just about a difference aspect -- the binary output of the codec.
A measurement of identical bit stream from the output as the input is a proof of a perfect codec in term of fidelity. Only lossless codec can achieve that.
Unfortunately, LDAC is a lossy codec. The output of the decoder differs from the input of the encoder.
How do we compare lossy codec? The usual objective analog measurements such as THD, cutoff frequency, latency, etc are valid measurement, even when it was taken from the analog output.
Why? Because the hardware implementation are often suboptimal due the technical constraints. One of the examples is
Apple hardware handles AAC codec much better than Android vendors out there.
Poor performance on Android phones is not the codec’s fault
The key finding from all of the tests is that Android smartphones perform much worse than Apple’s iPhone when using the AAC codec. However that’s not surprising:
Android simply doesn’t handle AAC well.
Hence, the actual implementation has to be taken into the account. Measuring the analog output is still a valid representation of the total solution. As least, it represented the subject measured, LG V30.
Hence, while there are other advantages of the LDAC, such as higher bitrate, the findings of the soundguys site still hold.