How To tell between a 'real' FLAC and a 'fake' FLAC?
Aug 31, 2009 at 10:31 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 50

chinesekiwi

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Feb 29, 2008
Posts
3,797
Likes
28
I know this question's been asked before and there was a program that someone mentioned that looked at the files via spectrograms and gave you readings such as indicating the peak kHz readings etc.... but couldn't find the thread.

If anyone can give me a link to that program = great!
beyersmile.png
 
Aug 31, 2009 at 11:08 PM Post #3 of 50

AtomikPi

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Aug 15, 2008
Posts
622
Likes
31
Sure.
Spectro - Freeware Audio File Analyzer

By the way, you'll probably want to know that with LAME mp3's you'll get around 16 khz for 128 and around 19-20 for v0 and 320 (cd is around 22 khz) although of course for more information, Google is your friend.

edit: also the above program is the best I've found - it reads flac natively, is super fast and lightweight, and is easy to use.
 
Oct 8, 2010 at 9:36 AM Post #6 of 50

Jany

New Head-Fier
Joined
Oct 8, 2010
Posts
1
Likes
11
Ill show you how i detect fake FLAC
smily_headphones1.gif


Software: Spectro
Homepage: http://spectro.enpts.com/

FLAC vs MP3[320kbps]:


MP3[128kbps <lol>]:


After analyze fake flac you will see same specro like on source mp3.
TIP: Not always you will have 22,1KHz but that don't means its fake.
When i spectred full quality human sound solo, spectro is low xP
On website are good news, author will add multiple scan option
smily_headphones1.gif

 
Oct 11, 2010 at 10:38 PM Post #7 of 50

khaos974

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Posts
2,085
Likes
117
I woudn't be sure the difference is as clear as you make it, some recordings, for example CDs that were made from old recordings (the 60s ot the 70s), sometime simply don't contain high frequencies at all, or at a very low level. Similarly, I have some CDs which were recorded at a whooping -35dB average to allow for really high dynamics, and these contain very little HF info too. Do I need to talk about badly mixed pop music for which the samples used were already MP3s at the production stage?
 
So looking for the missing frequencies is a bad method.
 
Apr 22, 2011 at 2:13 AM Post #8 of 50

Pratt

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Aug 21, 2010
Posts
176
Likes
14
Yea, I think there is more to it then just Freq. analyzing, especially because that's easy to get confused even for those who think they know what they are doing. It's a bit arbitrary and or misleading sometimes at least. I wish there was some simple definitive program one could use to scan lossless files to see if they truly are, without having to figure out freq. spectrums for each recording. I haven't found any yet; I've even used some on some cd's I knew were lossless because I ripped them myself and I got weird freq. spectrums and less than 100% probability for being lossless, sometimes even 70 to 80% probability for being lossy.
 
I don't trust any program. The only way to truly know you have lossless is to buy and rip the cd yourself of course.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Apr 22, 2011 at 4:03 AM Post #9 of 50

svyr

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jun 8, 2009
Posts
3,432
Likes
481
I woudn't be sure the difference is as clear as you make it, some recordings, for example CDs that were made from old recordings (the 60s ot the 70s), sometime simply don't contain high frequencies at all, or at a very low level. Similarly, I have some CDs which were recorded at a whooping -35dB average to allow for really high dynamics, and these contain very little HF info too. Do I need to talk about badly mixed pop music for which the samples used were already MP3s at the production stage?
 
So looking for the missing frequencies is a bad method.


+1 transfers from old tapes/digital tapes for classical sometimes you get a FR from about 100hz to 8khz :D... Sometimes whatever digital format they were stored in could well be a variation of Mpeg (l2, l3 :D ) so Cut-offs and inspecting the higher end spectrum for artifacts is a bit hit and miss.

Tau is for CDs, Aucdtect/Audiochecker (and a better AUCDTect GUI http://y-soft.org/English/products/auCDtect-Task-Manager/ ) are for encoded lossless files (basically it's a GUI on top of AUCDTect and WV,FLAC,APE, etc decoders. Decodes to wav, passes the wav to aucdtect and spits out the log.

Aucdtect is not very well regarded. It uses the analysis techniques described in http://en.true-audio.com/Tau_Analyzer_-_Aucdtect_Algorithm_Details
which appear to be sound, but people argue it doesn't spot non mp3 compression too well, especially at higher bitrates (ogg, aac, etc)

It also won't tell you whether someone decided to volume level the entire CD before encoding it :D ...


Anyway, if anyone has ACM access and can pull http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1597828 for us, I'd be interested to have a read (or anything on the similar theme that follow on from it or relates to it) . edit: ooh found it http://www.fileden.com/files/2009/2/14/2321055/My%20Documents/MP3%20Bit%20Rate%20Quality%20Detection%20through%20Frequency.pdf or something like http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=4490000 / http://www.csie.nctu.edu.tw/~cmliu/Courses/Compression/Artifacts.pdf , since the other one is not cited... :D (unfortunately there aren't automated tools for the later papers :D ). UNfortunately, most papers seem to deal with low bitrate artifacts for things like VoIP, or watermarking or forensics...
 
Apr 22, 2011 at 12:02 PM Post #10 of 50

xnor

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
May 28, 2009
Posts
4,092
Likes
221
Yea, I think there is more to it then just Freq. analyzing [...]


Exactly. Unless you ripped the tracks on your own you simply cannot tell what happened to the files.

That's why there exist tools like AccurateRip for example.
 
Apr 22, 2011 at 7:41 PM Post #11 of 50

svyr

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jun 8, 2009
Posts
3,432
Likes
481
Yea, I think there is more to it then just Freq. analyzing [...]


Exactly. Unless you ripped the tracks on your own you simply cannot tell what happened to the files.

That's why there exist tools like AccurateRip for example.


ah, good point. If you have a tool that takes an AR log/cue file or just the plain flacs and verifies the CRCs that's probably a good indication. e.g. cuetools can do it, it think : http://forum.dbpoweramp.com/showthread.php?t=23610 or they mention a foobar plugin and that app: http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=87503


CueTools can verify lossless rips of many tracks and albums at once - I believe that all such files would need to be under the same directory (or in a subdirectory) to accomplish this. You don't need to create a batch file and then run the batch file - this works form the user interface, and you don't need cue files. Results files are created for each album when you run this. The .accurip files are in fact text files and can be read by any Wordpad or the like.

I've had poor luck using the Accuraterip Manager plug-in with Foobar - CueTools is far superior. I don't think Cuetools can verify lossy files nor can it check across pressings, so it's not perfect, but I haven't found anyhting better to verify old rips. If there is a better tool I've love recommendations.


^ well, there we go...
 
Apr 26, 2011 at 7:02 PM Post #12 of 50

Dobrescu George

Reviewer: AudiophileHeaven
Joined
Jan 30, 2011
Posts
15,233
Likes
8,044
Location
Bucharest, Romania
i am using audacity.... it is hard to understand, it takes time and effort to read it's graphics, and it makes a little- to no sense... but it shows which is flac which is not flac.... because it shows if the information contained in the song is expanded or not, and it shows if the song has unaudible-but present parts...l.
 
Apr 28, 2011 at 9:07 AM Post #13 of 50

Fatalethal

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Apr 24, 2011
Posts
200
Likes
17
weird... i tried selecting all the songs i ripped using dbpoweramp but it says failed when attempting to load the song into the spectro
 
Sep 13, 2011 at 4:34 AM Post #15 of 50

aqua11alta

New Head-Fier
Joined
Sep 13, 2011
Posts
1
Likes
0
 
Quote:
i am using audacity.... it is hard to understand, it takes time and effort to read it's graphics, and it makes a little- to no sense... but it shows which is flac which is not flac.... because it shows if the information contained in the song is expanded or not, and it shows if the song has unaudible-but present parts...l.



Hi. can you tell me more about that? How do you tell which is 'fake'/'real' flac? I just downloaded Audacity and chose the function 'Analyze' --> 'Plot Spectrum', but I don't know how to translate the the spectrum :frowning2:
 
thanks
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top