Jae Yoon says: At least you brought up your points! <<<< at least? what post of mine doesn't bring up points?>>>>You didn't run away completely! <<<< who says I ran away and how you come to that conclusion?>>>
So how do exactly did you see this? "it's the internal processing inside the chip that reconstructs the analog signal where you start seeing the first differences in sound, thats why is so funny when they talk about a perfectly converted signal."
So you are saying your product you purchased, is showing you that it is reconstructing the conversion and altering it with all the expensive materials that are inside.<<<yes that is what is happening exactly, the internal processing of the chip interprets the 1 and 0's you all love to talk about so much, and yes the materials used also alter the sound for the good or for the bad and weather they are expensive materials or not, and yes thats what my thats what the product i purchased is showing me, just like any other product i purchased.>>>>
@bigshot and
@gregorio
Would you like to recommend our man here for some DACs that you can confirm are audibly transparent not sold by companies that alter the sound intentionally to sound different.
Thanks
<<<<<no need to bother I already asked about the 300 dollar product that performs like a 5000 dac, got ignored but I didnt bother to continue asking for proof like they do to me. I won't establish more converdation with those individuals due to the way they so cheaply used low moves to discredit me, I exposed their praactices and that was the end for me.
Also electro please don't laugh at
@Kammerat Rebekka there is plenty of proof that an Iphone 6 can compete with Chord products <<<<<< yeah i read all this very very long ago, im aware of the flatness of the iphone 4 and how a samsung 3 had also an good flat signal, that doesn't mean they are and reconstructing the asnalog signal in the same way or with the same performance.>>>>>
https://kenrockwell.com/apple/iphone-6s-plus-audio-quality.htm
http://archimago.blogspot.com/2014/10/measurements-apple-iphone-4-iphone-6.html?m=1
Edit: Unfortunately archimago and ken did not compare the chord products to them
But the point of these sources is to show that even an iphone is capable of producing an audibly transparent audio signal at much lower price for us working class humans to enjoy
There two places to check out how even an iphone 6 can produce high fidelity audio <<<<sure body, actually I bet there are more than 2 places that show iphone outputs high res sound, but you fail to understand that not all high res audio is produced in the same way>>>>>
Archimago shows good data on tiny differences between the phones. But whether tiny differences are audible to average human ear is the big debate that is supposed to be what this thread is going on about. <<<<< let me solve it for you, yes differences are audible for the average human ear>>>>
Several of the people here such as
@bigshot is not concerned of the numbers that the chord dave can pull off if he can't detect it audibly. What is the purpose for someone such as him to spend 2 grand on a item that has really good numbers but humans have a really hard time detecting.
I honestly have nothing against audiophiles who do choose to improve every aspect of their equipment. But this thread wants to discuss if those improvement in numbers is even audible between expensive cables and solid state dacs.<<<<<yeah thats what i keep saying, if you can't hear differences then be happy you get the max performance with your iphone but dont come and try to convince others of your limited perceptions>>>