QQQ
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2007
- Posts
- 2,575
- Likes
- 16
Quote:
If you 6'5", yeah, if 6'0'' - not so much.
Good weight for me is 220 lbs |
If you 6'5", yeah, if 6'0'' - not so much.
Good weight for me is 220 lbs |
Originally Posted by milkweg /img/forum/go_quote.gif Yea, I read a National Geographic article some years back about potatoes and this guy survived on just potatoes and a little lemon juice in his water perfectly fine for one year. |
Originally Posted by Uncle Erik /img/forum/go_quote.gif I can't find it now, but there was a study released this year that demonstrated that all weight loss diets work insofar as they reduce calories. I'm fairly convinced that calories are the major culprit in weight gain and loss... |
Originally Posted by QQQ /img/forum/go_quote.gif If you 6'5", yeah, if 6'0'' - not so much. |
Originally Posted by bigrigdog /img/forum/go_quote.gif I'll jump in here since I've had serious weight issues through high school. 1. American culture now tolerates obesity compared to 50 years ago. It wasn't long ago that the morbidly obese were openly ridiculed and viewed as an unsightly minority. Bill Cosby's original 1950's Fat Albert stand-up routine, if anyone remembers, is polar opposite of PC. 2. The skinny kids and average weight adults seen in the Woodstock documentary were close to the depression and WWII culture of food conservation and rationing. Food was also more expensive coming out of the postwar era. Food became less expensive with mass production and streamlined shippng logistics, leading to increased portion sizes. 3. HFCS and transfats are not killers. HFCS that passes through digestive enzymes are the same as table sugar. Transfats lose the cis-isomer in their glycerol molecule head, and mostly revert to an unsaturated state. I would be more concerned with the quantity of antibiotics and fat soluble hormones that are present in livestock in the few weeks approaching slaughter. 4. Intake is the key- and it doesn't just stop at caloric intake vs. metabolic output. Elevated blood sugar levels (doesn't matter if it's HFCS or table sugar) throw off the liver and pancreas' ability to regulate healthy insulin levels. Sugary processed foods without any supplemental dietary fiber put one's insulin production on roller coaster. Most members of my mom's immediate family are or were diabetic. I choose to eat a simple sugar restricted diet so I can stave off diabetes in my later years. 5. Might as well throw out the USDA food pyramid as well. It was a wheat grower's lobby marketing campaign in the 70's. |
Originally Posted by dallan /img/forum/go_quote.gif Still no comments about the fact that it is a free radical? Maybe the idea of free radicals are not mainstream yet in a lot of the country. |
Originally Posted by dallan /img/forum/go_quote.gif Who isn't worried about the antibiotics and hormones in livestock, let alone the fact that they store that and all the pesticides they have taken in in their reproductive(milk/cheese)organs and fat/muscle tissue...which is what is eaten. |
That doesn't deflect from the fact that the amount of HFCS in food is alarming. |
In addition as i said before from what i understand it effects (inhibits) the part of your brain that tells you that you are full thus you eat more. |
Still no comments about the fact that it is a free radical? Maybe the idea of free radicals are not mainstream yet in a lot of the country. |
Originally Posted by bigrigdog /img/forum/go_quote.gif I'll jump in here since I've had serious weight issues through high school. 1. American culture now tolerates obesity compared to 50 years ago. (...) 2. The skinny kids and average weight adults seen in the Woodstock documentary were close to the depression and WWII culture of food conservation and rationing. (...) 3. HFCS and transfats are not killers. (...) 4. Intake is the key- and it doesn't just stop at caloric intake vs. metabolic output. (...) 5. Might as well throw out the USDA food pyramid as well. It was a wheat grower's lobby marketing campaign in the 70's. |
Originally Posted by dallan Who isn't worried about the antibiotics and hormones in livestock, let alone the fact that they store that and all the pesticides they have taken in in their reproductive(milk/cheese)organs and fat/muscle tissue...which is what is eaten. |
In addition as i said before from what i understand it effects (inhibits) the part of your brain that tells you that you are full thus you eat more. |
Still no comments about the fact that it is a free radical? Maybe the idea of free radicals are not mainstream yet in a lot of the country. |
Originally Posted by ericj /img/forum/go_quote.gif If antibiotics are being administered indiscriminately or livestock is being slaughtered at inappropriate times, you'd do well to make arguments against abuse of antibiotics in livestock. |