As always, an over the top positive, hyped review. Like with 99% of written reviews. Honestly i can't stand it anymore.
If you want serious advice, don't read reviews, check out this forum and (painfully) search for rather critical posts...
This goes for every TOTL, be it Unveiled, Immanis, LCD4, Utopia...
Headfonia writes:
"The bass reproduction is powerful"
"Bass, mids and treble all sound weighty, exciting and engaging."
"Bass is both present in quality as in quantity."
"Yes, the new Susvara has more body, weight and it overall sounds fuller, punchier, tighter."
"Now you have more bass weight."
Sorry, but this is objectively as false as it can get. End of story. At least when you compare it to the OG Susvara on a powerful amp (which everyone should) and not a JDS Atom.
Seriously, this has nothing to do anymore with subjectivity, it's just false. People read it, are hyped for a bassier Susvara, buy it, and then will be extremely dissappointed.
Sorry for the rant, but i'm angry that these people are working in the industry and (as always) can't publish a review of a very expensive headphone without mentioning even one sonic (clear) disadvantage. How many reviewers mentioning something like the 1.2kHz Honk of the old Audeze line, the super aggressive nature of the OG Utopia, the (somewhat) lack of intimacy of the Immanis, etc...
Very, very few. Wavetheory does for example. Why are most reviewers always so disconnected from the normal experience a user in this hobby has...
Let's see if this post gets deleted by mods.