Personally, I think a birth child of Hifiman and Audeze will be the superior breed. Hifiman driver and Audeze design and build quality.
And Audeze magnets
Personally, I think a birth child of Hifiman and Audeze will be the superior breed. Hifiman driver and Audeze design and build quality.
Never thought of that. Doesnt actually sound half bad.Personally, I think a birth child of Hifiman and Audeze will be the superior breed. Hifiman driver and Audeze design and build quality.
One thing that differentiates Audeze from Hifiman is the bass, probably generally more of a warm tilt with Audeze. I got to try out the LCD3F and interestingly, it has good amount of treble that I didn't find with their lower models like LCD2 or C as much. I generally thought they tuned it to recess the upper-mids than neutral to perhaps cause sensation of smoothness with certain tracks. Which on the other hand, Hifiman is the female vocal headphones that tend to provide that upper-mids without holding back.Never thought of that. Doesnt actually sound half bad.
Personally I also prefer Audeze still keeping their old sound, and create a new lineup for that for that joint collaboration. There is something addictive to old Audeze sound. I would miss it.
Personally, I think a birth child of Hifiman and Audeze will be the superior breed. Hifiman driver and Audeze design and build quality.
Personally, I don't think Zach needs help with his drivers. Unless Fang needs Zach's help.As long as we're talking crazy how about a zmf / hifiman merger. Fang can design the drivers and Zach takes care of the rest. basic woods and good build quality for made in China flagship, USA made versions can focus on custom woods and Rolex level fit and finish.
Same here. Its not just you.i take the hex2 over the lcd3. In overall sound and comfort. Must be my amp
i take the hex2 over the lcd3. In overall sound and comfort. Must be my amp
Same here. Its not just you.
i take the hex2 over the lcd3. In overall sound and comfort. Must be my amp
Same here. Its not just you.
I’m in the same camp as you all.
Why? Why? Why?
I'm curious to know - I have owned the ananda and own the zmf auteur and lcd 2 (was happy with all 3 of them to a big extent) but have only demoed the lcd3 a couple of times
So wondering where/how you see that lcd3 (i guess relative to the ananda/hex v2 as a reference point)
thanks in advance
I was surprised how good the Auteur was relative to the eikon and atticus that did not impress me/my preferences at all.For me, it’s always the same three issues with Audeze: weight,tuning, soundstage. All the LCD’s are too damn heavy and they all have too much rolled off upper mids and lower treble, and some even have too rolled off upper treble. And none of them will amaze you with their soundstage, especially compared to the higher end Hifiman.
Some think the HEX V2 is too smooth and inoffensive in the treble. But compared to Audeze, the HEX V2 might as well be a Sennheiser 800.
Off topic, but how are you liking your Auteur? The only reason I haven’t bought one is because a lot of owners say it doesn’t have a very good soundstage.
Why? Why? Why?
I'm curious to know - I have owned the ananda and own the zmf auteur and lcd 2 (was happy with all 3 of them to a big extent) but have only demoed the lcd3 a couple of times
So wondering where/how you see that lcd3 (i guess relative to the ananda/hex v2 as a reference point)
thanks in advance[/QUOT
With a violectric amp. I liked the hex 2 better than the lcd 3. More detailed.
Yeah, I really don't understand why they want it more difficult for it to be driven and make it expensive as hell. It's like, we give you the previlages of difficulty fo yo azz, so pay up.Plus would really like someone else to take a stab at the at optimizing a headphone that totally sacrifices drive-ability (sensitivity). I suppose Abyss might fit this description, but it crosses the absolutely not line for me $$$ wise even used.