davidland
Head-Fier
got the hiby R6's review on headfonics: https://headfonics.com/2017/12/hiby-music-r6-review/ looks nice!
Last edited:
Uh yeah? Hello Captain Obvious? Crash the wrong party much?have you heard of HiBy? they've got the hiby R6's review on headfonics: https://headfonics.com/2017/12/hiby-music-r6-review/ looks nice!
Stay updated on HiBy at their facebook, website or email (icons below).
Stay updated on HiBy at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
|
Does it support media control from the headset? like double pressing the play button of the wire and skip the song etc?
Stay updated on HiBy at their facebook, website or email (icons below).
Stay updated on HiBy at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
|
Is there proof that this is confirmed? My fav iems happens to be BA based and need very low OI. I don't really listen to full sized headphones out of DAPs.Yes same sentiment here, the R6 was supposed to be the perfect DAP for me. Full Android support, DTA, Fast UI, excellent player (Hiby music), good enough battery life, very good output power, looks gorgeous. But then the OI is like throwing a wrench to a perfectly rotating series of gears. The link that Joe has posted was from 2002. That problem has been long resolved. Instead, we have to go back in that era and look at those workaround again if we want to use iems which are trending near 0 load impedance and increasing crossover points. If I get R6 I'm afraid I have limited iems I can use or go around hoops again to mitigate it. Not cool imo. Perhaps after the R6 Hiby would consider releasing a successor that has low OI. Not release asking for very low OI. Just in 1 - 2 Ohm range would have been perfect.
The output impedance of the R6 is still reported to be 10 ohm by the engineering department. Looking at schematics there's a fixed resistor in the signal path of that value so the logic from which output impedance is derived seems pretty fixed and straightforward.
The output impedance is what it is. Low-Z earphones with impedance swings will have their FR "shaped" to some extent according to voltage division rules. The upshot of that could be beneficial or bad for any given pair of earphones depending on the earphones' tuning at 0 ohm OI (e.g. we could have a BA set sounding dull / dark at 0 ohms yet with an impedance upswing in the treble range; the 10 ohm OI would then brighten up the earphones nicely. The opposite can hold true of course).
As far as driving ability is concerned, the 10 ohms are there precisely so that the TPA6120A may drive the lowest-Z earphones without distortion or instability. So theoretically low-Z earphones work "well". Damping factor is a term to be reserved for damping of driver resonances; low-Z IEMs have no such thing but have ear canal resonances which are not treatable via damping factor. The technical issue that remains then is the frequency response change noted above. Consult your earphones' impedance response curve and frequency response curve. Do frequency response peaks meet with impedance response dips or vice versa? Therein lies the answer to whether the R6 can complement your low-Z earphones. No impedance response data? Take a roll of the dice--or take advantage of the advanced tone shaping functions (the MageSound 8-ball) to be added to the R6 exclusive version of HiBy Music.
Finally, one indisputable benefit of a bit of output impedance is that they make low-Z earphones less sensitive to the amplifier, which reduces amp noise. When an amp has 300mW on tap even at 32 ohms and the multi-BA low-Z IEM in question has like 120dB / mW sensitivity, this is no trivial matter. For example I was testing a FiiO E17K headphone amp (0 OI, 200-odd mW into 32 ohms) against the R6 with one such pair of IEMs. The R6 sounded brighter with said IEMs, I was ambivalent about the merit of this for said IEMs. But the E17K hissed. Not just a little bit, but quite noticeably even at minimum gain.
Well, that is all I have to say on the subject for now. Whatever you decide, I'll be here waiting, listening to some happy tunes on my R6
With early seasons' greetings,
Joe
@SilverEars, here's the quote from @Joe Bloggs himself. Looks like the hardware is already final. So probably our best hope is to look forward to R7 or R6MKII. Hiby nailed it down imo in each important categories for a modern DAP except the OI.
As I'm an aging boomer just like you, and my hearing is not as sharp any more (can't hear a damned thing beyond 15kHz), I got myself some iems that have been specifically designed for people like us, and after rolling a few tips they are now perfect and sound beautifully, with a fantastic soundstage, so I thought of sharing this. Plus, being dual dynamic, they shouldn't be affected by high OI impedance issues. Here's the only review on h-fi: https://www.head-fi.org/showcase/blue-ever-blue-2000ex.22694/reviews Tips used: Spinfit LWoohoo!!!
I finally saw the rave review from HawaiiBadBoy I was expecting on YouTube and pulled the trigger on the beautiful stainless steel unit. My ears are not what they used to be (another aging boomer) and speed and features are more of a differentiator for me as I assume high quality sound and agree with HBB’s emphasis on the transducer for sound. Can’t wait until March!
Differences in output impedance are the same "changes" that happen when using different cables for headphones. It is a effective change of driver impedance. This is basically just a really long cable.
Also, since audio is a very subjective subject, ANY audio purchase is a gamble. You might like it, you might not. Dont let the high OI of this DAP scare you away. A lot of people will say its inherently bad, but it is not, just, different.