hi there i'm a complete nub and need a recommendation if you don't mind

May 24, 2008 at 9:52 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 10

completenub

New Head-Fier
Joined
May 24, 2008
Posts
2
Likes
0
hello there I'm a nub when it comes to "audiophile" level electronics. I've owned sennheiser cx-300's and the UE super.fi 5's. I'm looking to replace the super.fi's and I'm looking at the grado sr-80's. i'm trying to stay under $150, but i've heard the sr-125's may need a headphone amp (i'm using a portable cd player) and I'm not trying to get into that level of seriousness. I listen to mostly metal (do not mock me), but also movie scores, audiobooks and stuff like that. My question is, is it worth it switching from the super.fi 5's to the grados? will I be able to tell the difference? I really just want a change, I don't think the super.fi's are bad or anything, but i have a little cash to blow and promised my wife I would no longer attend strip clubs. thanks if you can help
 
May 24, 2008 at 10:55 AM Post #3 of 10
The Alessandro MS1 is an excellent introduction to headphones at around US$100.

The MS1, SR-80 and SR-125 all sound roughly similar to each other. They all benefit from a good source and amplification, but I don't think an amp is absolutely necessary, especially with a portable source. For example, the MS1 sounds good driven by an iPod's headphone output and should also sound OK with a portable CD player.

All three are open headphones, meaning they don't isolate and leak some sound. They sound best in a quiet environment. If you need isolation an IEM or a closed headphone will probably be better choices.
 
May 25, 2008 at 2:39 PM Post #5 of 10
The difference between an amped SR80 (and Allesandro) and an unamped one is pretty small. It mostly improves detail at higher volumes. These phones benefit more from a good source or outboard DAC.
 
May 25, 2008 at 2:52 PM Post #6 of 10
You can always try the Sennheiser HD485'S[I've listened to everything from Black Sabbath to the Grateful Dead on em and they never let me down sonically].
 
May 25, 2008 at 2:57 PM Post #7 of 10
The SR-80s are perfect for metal because they have more energy and a sweet mid-bass kick. The MS-1s can sometimes be unbearably bright with electric guitar (which is why I sold mine). Every comparison post I've read had people prefer the SR-80s with rock/electronic, while people that listen to classical/jazz prefer the MS-1s.

Oh yeah...here's a link comparing the two: http://www.head-fi.org/forums/f4/dif...s-ms1s-245510/
 
May 25, 2008 at 3:13 PM Post #8 of 10
Quote:

Originally Posted by BrookR1 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
The SR-80s are perfect for metal because they have more energy and a sweet mid-bass kick. The MS-1s can sometimes be unbearably bright with electric guitar (which is why I sold mine). Every comparison post I've read had people prefer the SR-80s with rock/electronic, while people that listen to classical/jazz prefer the MS-1s.

Oh yeah...here's a link comparing the two: http://www.head-fi.org/forums/f4/dif...s-ms1s-245510/



I always thought MS-1s were considered to be more neutral then the Grado SR series, therefor less bright?
 
May 25, 2008 at 3:25 PM Post #10 of 10
Quote:

Originally Posted by goober-george /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I always thought MS-1s were considered to be more neutral then the Grado SR series, therefor less bright?


They are more neutral, but aren't as balanced. The MS-1s are brighter than the SR-80s. The treble is more extended but there's less bass to compensate for the extended treble. The SR-80s are darker sounding. The MS-1s are very similar to the SR-125s the only difference being that they don't have the mid-bass kick of the SR-125s.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top