AudioMastermind
Banned: AKA Achlys
I don't know if it's just me, but I find understanding sound quality with headphones (even speakers and IEMs) on an objective and subjective level to be very straightforward. I thoroughly understand the math and underlying science behind audio and acoustics.
When I commented on my poor listening impressions of the MDR-Z1R, I was told I needed to upgrade the cable and source equipment I was using. Now, as someone who understands all the relevant math and science in this domain, this was absurd to me as cables of negligible resistance will all transmit the same energy and that the Apple dongle is an objectively neutral source with enough power to drive nearly any headphone flawlessly, as long as it gets loud enough, since it is impossible to clip the Apple dongle with a headphone which's impedance is 20 ohms or higher.
Is there anyone that can explain the math and science behind these claims? As someone who formally studies and researches audio science at one of the world's highest ranking universities, I am required to understand the depths of audio. Is there something I have completely wrong?
When I commented on my poor listening impressions of the MDR-Z1R, I was told I needed to upgrade the cable and source equipment I was using. Now, as someone who understands all the relevant math and science in this domain, this was absurd to me as cables of negligible resistance will all transmit the same energy and that the Apple dongle is an objectively neutral source with enough power to drive nearly any headphone flawlessly, as long as it gets loud enough, since it is impossible to clip the Apple dongle with a headphone which's impedance is 20 ohms or higher.
Is there anyone that can explain the math and science behind these claims? As someone who formally studies and researches audio science at one of the world's highest ranking universities, I am required to understand the depths of audio. Is there something I have completely wrong?
Last edited: