HD650 Unamped v HD600 Amped?
post-826281
Thread Starter
Post #1 of 9

jtwn

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Jan 9, 2004
Messages
172
Reaction score
10
Joined
Jan 9, 2004
Posts
172
Likes
10
Im planning to buy this week, what do you think would impress me more,

a new HD 650 unamped (would get an amp in 2 months or so)

or

my existing HD 600s with a XP-7?


Any replies will be appreciated
 
     Share This Post       
post-826289
Post #2 of 9

Chefguru

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Oct 1, 2003
Messages
1,768
Reaction score
18
Joined
Oct 1, 2003
Posts
1,768
Likes
18
Quote:

Originally Posted by jtwn
Im planning to buy this week, what do you think would impress me more,

a new HD 650 unamped (would get an amp in 2 months or so)

or

my existing HD 600s with a XP-7?


Any replies will be appreciated



hd600 / xp-7 is my vote
 
     Share This Post       
post-826291
Post #3 of 9

fewtch

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jul 23, 2003
Messages
9,559
Reaction score
24
Joined
Jul 23, 2003
Posts
9,559
Likes
24
Are you generally happy with the 600s? Then I'd go for the amp. If not, the HD650s.
 
     Share This Post       
post-826310
Post #4 of 9

Eagle_Driver

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jun 22, 2001
Messages
6,447
Reaction score
25
Joined
Jun 22, 2001
Posts
6,447
Likes
25
Unless you already own both a great high-end source and at least a good $500~$1000 amp, then I would say fuggiddabout the HD650. You won't achieve anywhere near that phone's full potential with even a middle-of-the-road source. I'd definitely get an amp first, then upgrade your source(s) - and then, lastly, get the HD650.
 
     Share This Post       
post-826318
Post #5 of 9

JaZZ

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
May 9, 2002
Messages
9,706
Reaction score
1,680
Location
Zürich, Switzerland
Joined
May 9, 2002
Location
Zürich, Switzerland
Posts
9,706
Likes
1,680
Age
70
For the moment the amp will give you more fun. I for one would go for the HD 650 (in the end). But also your source should be part of the strategy and match up with the rest.

 
     Share This Post       
post-826348
Post #6 of 9

tom hankins

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Mar 13, 2003
Messages
5,730
Reaction score
14
Joined
Mar 13, 2003
Posts
5,730
Likes
14
I'd get the amp now and the HD650's as soon as possible. Why are you going with the portable amp?
 
     Share This Post       
post-826350
Post #7 of 9

jtwn

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Jan 9, 2004
Messages
172
Reaction score
10
Joined
Jan 9, 2004
Posts
172
Likes
10
Ok thats my mind made up! The amp it is, thanks for all your replies.
 
     Share This Post       
post-826717
Post #8 of 9

Sovkiller

Proved that despite its huge size the CD3000 can be shoved down one's throat.
Joined
Jul 31, 2002
Messages
12,882
Reaction score
20
Joined
Jul 31, 2002
Posts
12,882
Likes
20
Both of these headphones need an amp to shine, some of the mebers will vote for the HD650, some for HD600, both sound a bit different so one, is not the replacmeent for the other, IMO you need to hear both and decided which is best suited for you, and then get an amp for any you choose......
 
     Share This Post       
post-826795
Post #9 of 9

go_vtec

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Feb 24, 2004
Messages
1,631
Reaction score
18
Location
US
Joined
Feb 24, 2004
Location
US
Posts
1,631
Likes
18
I have to agree with others. I would take HD600+amp over HD650+no amp in a heart beat. Without an amp, HD6x0 sounds just plain wrong. Also a descent source is must to make them really sing (amplifying PCDPs headphone out will sound flat/lifeless). I know many of us make a big deal out of difference between HD600 vs. HD650, but without a descent source/amp, you will negate the advantage of HD650. If I had a choice between descent source (dedicated CD player perhaps)+good amp+HD600 vs. not-so-great source/amp+HD650, I would definitely go over the first. Price difference between HD600 and HD650 alone will get you a pretty descent universal player or good redbook only player.
 
     Share This Post       

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top