greggf
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2006
- Posts
- 1,313
- Likes
- 252
I'm using Sennheiser HD600 headphones now, with the Eddie Current Zana Deux amp, and what I'm hearing indicates that I've never really heard these headphones before.
I've had lots of sub-$1k headphone amps - the Headroom Millett Hybrid, the Naim Headline2, the Lehmann Black Cube Linear, the PS Audio GCHA, the WooAudio3, and even the Melos SHA-1, but geez, the HD600 are far richer, more harmonically-complex, and dynamic than I ever knew possible.
Veil? What nonsense. Completely inconceivable to think of "veils" now. The infamous veil is a byproduct of the headphone amp being used, I'm afraid.
Now I'm itching to try the HD650 - again.
I'm afraid it isn't as bloated and slow as other amps have presented it.
I can't speak about balancing the Senns, or other high end amps, balanced or otherwise. I'm skeptical about balancing. I assume the theoretical benefits that balancing add are subtracted by balancing's complexity. But now I don't know.
It looks like any extreme measure that you can take when it comes to the HD6XX is worth a shot, whether it's an obscene application of cash, balancing, coal-fired amplification, whatever.
If I was just starting out, I'd stick to something like the HD595, something that's easy to drive. I wouldn't fool with the 600 or 650. The 595 is a good headphone. Paired with a Heed or a Musical Fidelity XCan, you got it made.
Which brings up the question, both philosophical and practical: is it better to drive a good headphone well, or better to drive an excellent headphone less well?
I'd pick the former, but I'm sure lots of people would pick the latter.
I've had lots of sub-$1k headphone amps - the Headroom Millett Hybrid, the Naim Headline2, the Lehmann Black Cube Linear, the PS Audio GCHA, the WooAudio3, and even the Melos SHA-1, but geez, the HD600 are far richer, more harmonically-complex, and dynamic than I ever knew possible.
Veil? What nonsense. Completely inconceivable to think of "veils" now. The infamous veil is a byproduct of the headphone amp being used, I'm afraid.
Now I'm itching to try the HD650 - again.

I can't speak about balancing the Senns, or other high end amps, balanced or otherwise. I'm skeptical about balancing. I assume the theoretical benefits that balancing add are subtracted by balancing's complexity. But now I don't know.
It looks like any extreme measure that you can take when it comes to the HD6XX is worth a shot, whether it's an obscene application of cash, balancing, coal-fired amplification, whatever.
If I was just starting out, I'd stick to something like the HD595, something that's easy to drive. I wouldn't fool with the 600 or 650. The 595 is a good headphone. Paired with a Heed or a Musical Fidelity XCan, you got it made.
Which brings up the question, both philosophical and practical: is it better to drive a good headphone well, or better to drive an excellent headphone less well?
I'd pick the former, but I'm sure lots of people would pick the latter.