Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Pa /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I would not identify myself as much of a "whiz" on anything under any circumstances; that is not my place.
|
I have to say your insights and opinions have been very enjoyable over the years. I have come to look forward to your posts and value your input highly. Generally we pretty much think alike.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Pa /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Thank you for posting the link to the actual FL statutory language. It made for interesting reading and comported fully with my original understanding of the statute and assumptions stemming from that.
|
Actually, it diverges from my understanding of your previous posts. This may be my misunderstanding. It clearly states that the use of deadly force is reasonable in the case of someone forcibly entering your structure. This diverges from the common "Castle Doctrine" where you still have to prove you were in the right to use deadly force. This is not at all how I interpreted your previous postings, my apologies if I misunderstood their intent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Pa /img/forum/go_quote.gif
My previous legal analysis, therefore, stands unamended. I am sorry I cannot support your interpretation of the statute. FL provides no "immunity from civil suit after a shooting."
|
That's a red herring since that is a side issue. That's an entirely different part of the statutes. Let's get the first issue resolved before we go for the second discussion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Pa /img/forum/go_quote.gif
There is no caselaw cited on the statute. To my knowledge, there is no caselaw at this time on the statute at all.
|
That would be a fundamental misunderstanding on your part. You seem to be confusing this with "Castle Doctrine" and this preceded "Castle Doctrine" by a number of years. It was enacted after Cuba dumped their prisons on our shores and the crime rates shot up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Pa /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Caselaw come from appellate judicial opinions in the jurisdiction on actual facts and circumstances appearing in actual cases at bar. You certainly don't have to accept my legal analysis, but you owe it to yourself to obtain a competent FL legal opinion before you go off, as we say, half-cocked.
|
I've already gotten the opinion of Jon H. Gutmacher who is the acknowledged expert on Florida Gun Laws. His book is not only something every Florida gun owner should own it's even used to train the law enforcement community. For his analysis go
here. You'll see the exact same thing I've been telling you. It is an absolute presumption that the homeowner was in the right with the only caveats the ones I linked to above. Not a jury instruction type presumption, the law enforcement personnel in theory can't even attempt to prosecute you. You can't be performing illegal acts, shooting at the Po-Po, etc. but so long as your heart is pure and you have made sure of the points I have covered in this thread, you're good to go.
The reality of Florida gun law is that it is almost unthinkable for anyone to get jammed up if the other person was committing a seriously illegal act, especially a felony. After one incident where a homeowner shot a guy who was stealing his compressor they quoted one of the local attorneys as "I would be stunned if he were charged since the other person was in the midst of committing a felony." Long story I won't get into, but it is NOT legal in Florida to shoot someone because they are stealing your property.
I personally think this little sidebar is very instructive for anyone wanting to use a weapon for home defense. Old Pa is what I would consider an expert in his state laws and I would be willing to bet dollars to donuts in "Castle Doctrine" as is it usually defined. I have a tremendous amount of respect for Old Pa's opinion since it is almost always dead on.
Generally, most of the "Castle Doctrine" laws are very similar since they were all set in motion by the NRA and therefore shared a common base. Most of them have little patches here and there which keep them from being exactly the same. And in spite of this, the reality of their application in a particular state is not going to be the same.
That means that you MUST become an expert in your state laws or you can make your life a WHOLE LOT worse. These aren't nerf guns, you're playing for all the marbles. Saying you're sorry after the fact and you didn't meant to make a mistake isn't going to change what happens to you, at least not enough that the repercussions won't change your life forever.