TheSloth
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2005
- Posts
- 2,378
- Likes
- 17
Quote:
Well I admit not knowing what I'm even looking for - I was surprised to see the small but wide suck-out from 1-4k, but again, maybe that's a good thing. I suppose I also wasn't expecting that spike at 6k. Though, the fact that they are only about -3dB at 10hz is pretty amazing!
It's interesting to see the huge differences in measurements. For example, the current 650 graph looks markedly different from the original 650 graph that was in the HR measurements v1, particularly in the treble. You don't see those kinds of discrepancies with properly controlled speaker measurements.
What will be very interesting will be to compare these with the graphs that Sennheiser will supposedly be publishing with each headphone. I suspect we will see big differences there too...
Originally Posted by Edwood /img/forum/go_quote.gif Disappointed? Look at the ends of the frequency curves. Look how much flatter the bass goes towards the bottom end towards the left. Clearly measures more bass than the HD650. Also, the right side, high frequency is higher as well. Hence the lack of "veil". Were you expecting a ruler flat line? -Ed |
Well I admit not knowing what I'm even looking for - I was surprised to see the small but wide suck-out from 1-4k, but again, maybe that's a good thing. I suppose I also wasn't expecting that spike at 6k. Though, the fact that they are only about -3dB at 10hz is pretty amazing!
It's interesting to see the huge differences in measurements. For example, the current 650 graph looks markedly different from the original 650 graph that was in the HR measurements v1, particularly in the treble. You don't see those kinds of discrepancies with properly controlled speaker measurements.
What will be very interesting will be to compare these with the graphs that Sennheiser will supposedly be publishing with each headphone. I suspect we will see big differences there too...