[spinrite]

http://playlistmag.com/features/2005...ears/index.php

If this is accurate then i'll pass up the E4Cs for these.

 

[Canman]

Why? It is an interesting set of impressions, but it makes no comparison to the Shure.

 

[spinrite]

the thread at this link explains alot more on the super.fi 5 pros in comparison to other IEMs

http://forums.ipodlounge.com/showthr...threadid=94762

 

[Spacko]

from that review i would not pass on the e4c. that review imo didnt say much about the earphones in great detail. when they talked about the sound quality all they sound was good overall balance. that doesnt quite do it for me. 80% the article just felt like it was advertising the earphones.

 

[spinrite]

i never said this review compares e4c to 5 pros...just that the reviewer gave them top marks for SQ

 

[etys rule]

Quote:

Originally Posted by spinrite http://playlistmag.com/features/2005...ears/index.php If this is accurate then i'll pass up the E4Cs for these.

After reading this, I would have to agree with Spacko in that this sounded like a simple advertisement for the product. There was no real review or SQ discussion, so that was two minutes spent I will never get back.

 

[James63]

I have an odd feeling the E4C vs Super .fi Pro debate will never end. Can we say Grado vs Sennheiser... lol. I guess we will just have to wait and see (or hear) is one is “better” than the other. I am guessing they have very similar sonic signatures.