Tyson
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2003
- Posts
- 2,165
- Likes
- 32
Box from sensaphonics in my mail room last night, created a very big grin on my face.
Rushing up to my apartment, tearing open the box. Suprise, they are using new cases to ship these in. Looks like a hard plastic divers case, has my name imprented on the opening clasp. Very nice.
Looking at the 2X-S they appear exactly like Lindrone's pics in his earlier review. Putting them in is no problem at all, after the Shure E5's and Ety 4S, these are a snap to get in.
Good news and bad news.
When I put them in and fired up Nikka Costa I'm thinking to myself, these things sound exactly like the Shure E5's. Big dissapointment. So, I figure they need to break in a bit, let them play for a few hours while my wife and I go to the movies. Come back and they are sounding much nicer. 1st observation, the do NOT like my OTL tube amp. Hum and buzz, and an overall mushy sound. So, time for a solid state headphone amp, I've got 2 at home, the Xcan's V1 heavily modded (actually a hybrid, with tube input and SS output). Much nicer. Then tried it with the headphone output from my AVA Transcendance 7 preamp, again very nice.
Going back to Nikka Costa, the voices are clearer and more prominent than on the Shure E5's, the bass is very strong and warm, but quite textured and fast. Mids blend perfectly, as does the high end. In fact the high end is the bit story here for me, as I listen to a lot fo classical music, so I immediately qued up the Kreutzer violin Sonata by Beethoven, performed by Perlman and Ashkenazy. On the E5's the violin almost sounds like a viola and the piano is a bit bass heavy. On the 2X-S the balance is pretty much perfect. The violin sounds like a violin, and you can hear the upper harmonics glinting off the strings and bow. One other area where it is immediately obvious the 2X-S outclasses the the E5's is the midrange and high frequency dynamics. The E5's tended to sound too relaxed, and the "jump factor" at these frequencies was diminished. This is something the Ety 4S did very well, and the 2X-S matches them there. And of course the 2X-S has better bass than the E5 (because it is tighter and more detailed), and far, far better bass than the E4 (becuase there is actually bass power).
Compared to my BeyerDynamic 250-250's, the 250's sound grainy and flat compared to the 2X-S. And compared to my Senn HD600's, the 600's sound undynamic, flat, and lacking bass.
So, the good news is that I'm ecstatically happy with the sound quality. The bad news is that the fit was terrible. If I opened my mouth even a little, the seal would break. If I moved my jaw to the side even a little, the seal would break. Singing along with a song would cause the seal to break. Leaning forward or laying down face down would cause the seal to break.
Needless to say I was NOT happy. So, called my audiologist and we set an appointment today to work through this. We met up a few hours ago, and he made sure I was putting them right (I was), and then we proceeded to make new impressions of my ears. We did 3 things different this time. 1st, the old impressions didn't go deep enough in my ear canal to make me feel like I got a great fit with great isolation. So, he put in the "stopper" much deeper in my ear this time (luckily I don't have a gag or cough reflex, which many people do, so this didn't bother me at all). Next, he had me do the impression with an open mouth (I bit down on a fairly wide box to keep my jaw rigidly open), and third he used a different, more viscous solution to inject in to my ears, to get an ever more detailed impression.
When they finished drying and he pulled them out, they were much deeper, and should make for a great fit when I get my 2X-S back again from Sensaphonics. BTW, this re-fitting was all part of the Sensaphonic guarantee, so it was all done for me completely free. Overall I'm disappointed that they didn't fit perfectly the first time, but glad to see that Sensaphonics really stands behind their product.
Rushing up to my apartment, tearing open the box. Suprise, they are using new cases to ship these in. Looks like a hard plastic divers case, has my name imprented on the opening clasp. Very nice.
Looking at the 2X-S they appear exactly like Lindrone's pics in his earlier review. Putting them in is no problem at all, after the Shure E5's and Ety 4S, these are a snap to get in.
Good news and bad news.
When I put them in and fired up Nikka Costa I'm thinking to myself, these things sound exactly like the Shure E5's. Big dissapointment. So, I figure they need to break in a bit, let them play for a few hours while my wife and I go to the movies. Come back and they are sounding much nicer. 1st observation, the do NOT like my OTL tube amp. Hum and buzz, and an overall mushy sound. So, time for a solid state headphone amp, I've got 2 at home, the Xcan's V1 heavily modded (actually a hybrid, with tube input and SS output). Much nicer. Then tried it with the headphone output from my AVA Transcendance 7 preamp, again very nice.
Going back to Nikka Costa, the voices are clearer and more prominent than on the Shure E5's, the bass is very strong and warm, but quite textured and fast. Mids blend perfectly, as does the high end. In fact the high end is the bit story here for me, as I listen to a lot fo classical music, so I immediately qued up the Kreutzer violin Sonata by Beethoven, performed by Perlman and Ashkenazy. On the E5's the violin almost sounds like a viola and the piano is a bit bass heavy. On the 2X-S the balance is pretty much perfect. The violin sounds like a violin, and you can hear the upper harmonics glinting off the strings and bow. One other area where it is immediately obvious the 2X-S outclasses the the E5's is the midrange and high frequency dynamics. The E5's tended to sound too relaxed, and the "jump factor" at these frequencies was diminished. This is something the Ety 4S did very well, and the 2X-S matches them there. And of course the 2X-S has better bass than the E5 (because it is tighter and more detailed), and far, far better bass than the E4 (becuase there is actually bass power).
Compared to my BeyerDynamic 250-250's, the 250's sound grainy and flat compared to the 2X-S. And compared to my Senn HD600's, the 600's sound undynamic, flat, and lacking bass.
So, the good news is that I'm ecstatically happy with the sound quality. The bad news is that the fit was terrible. If I opened my mouth even a little, the seal would break. If I moved my jaw to the side even a little, the seal would break. Singing along with a song would cause the seal to break. Leaning forward or laying down face down would cause the seal to break.
Needless to say I was NOT happy. So, called my audiologist and we set an appointment today to work through this. We met up a few hours ago, and he made sure I was putting them right (I was), and then we proceeded to make new impressions of my ears. We did 3 things different this time. 1st, the old impressions didn't go deep enough in my ear canal to make me feel like I got a great fit with great isolation. So, he put in the "stopper" much deeper in my ear this time (luckily I don't have a gag or cough reflex, which many people do, so this didn't bother me at all). Next, he had me do the impression with an open mouth (I bit down on a fairly wide box to keep my jaw rigidly open), and third he used a different, more viscous solution to inject in to my ears, to get an ever more detailed impression.
When they finished drying and he pulled them out, they were much deeper, and should make for a great fit when I get my 2X-S back again from Sensaphonics. BTW, this re-fitting was all part of the Sensaphonic guarantee, so it was all done for me completely free. Overall I'm disappointed that they didn't fit perfectly the first time, but glad to see that Sensaphonics really stands behind their product.