Former Westone 4 Owner looking for new IEM in similar price range
May 16, 2013 at 9:24 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 25

dqope21

New Head-Fier
Joined
Jun 15, 2012
Posts
25
Likes
10
I owned the W4's for about 2 years and just recently lost them sadly :frowning2:.  Now, I'm on the search for a new set of IEM's in that similar price range.  I found the W4's to be very pure but a bit boring. The sound was very balanced but I would prefer something more engaging and exciting this time around. I'm mainly listening to electronic music such as house and trance and music with a fast tempo with a heavy beat.  I've read many reviews but would like some more specific advice.  I've looked at the Shure SE535, Heir 4.Ai, Earsonic SM64 and SM3 v2, Sennheiser IE8, and other various models.  I haven't had the opportunity to try any of them so I'm relying on the expertise of this community.  I'd appreciate any advice or recommendations greatly. I tell myself that this is an opportunity to try something new as I was super upset to lose the W4's.  Thanks again.
 
May 16, 2013 at 10:29 AM Post #2 of 25

czqdtc

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Nov 9, 2010
Posts
492
Likes
25
Quote:
I owned the W4's for about 2 years and just recently lost them sadly :frowning2:.  Now, I'm on the search for a new set of IEM's in that similar price range.  I found the W4's to be very pure but a bit boring. The sound was very balanced but I would prefer something more engaging and exciting this time around. I'm mainly listening to electronic music such as house and trance and music with a fast tempo with a heavy beat.  I've read many reviews but would like some more specific advice.  I've looked at the Shure SE535, Heir 4.Ai, Earsonic SM64 and SM3 v2, Sennheiser IE8, and other various models.  I haven't had the opportunity to try any of them so I'm relying on the expertise of this community.  I'd appreciate any advice or recommendations greatly. I tell myself that this is an opportunity to try something new as I was super upset to lose the W4's.  Thanks again.


You won't find anything better at this price range in terms of sound-stage, separation and magical mids.
SM3V2 might be the best bet though, don't buy SM64 if the w4 sound is growing on to you already, I did that, regretted immediately.
535 is too mid-centric that you might find it fatiguing.
My advice is to get another W4, this thing is drug.
 
May 16, 2013 at 10:38 AM Post #3 of 25

Spyro

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Apr 15, 2003
Posts
6,574
Likes
243
SE535 is no more mid-centric than W4.
 
I'd recommend the SE535 but amp it and use the Westone star tips.  Compared to W4 which I just had for about 5 months.
 
  1. SE535 mids are much clearer, period.
  2. SE535 bass is a little bit fuller but not boosted or overdone in any way where W4 has a lower mid bump.
  3. SE535 is a little less analytical and a bit more fun and engaging.
 
 
These are the 3 main differences.  The soundstage size is about the same but I slightly prefer the SE535 (the left to right panning is sensational).  The SE535 goes louder and wont distort at really any volume if that matters to you.
 
The W4 treble extends a tad better but this is somewhat ineffective due to the veil.  I prefer a less extended treble with an exceptionally clear midrange over a more extended treble but an overall veil.
 
May 16, 2013 at 3:24 PM Post #4 of 25

Mooses9

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Posts
2,827
Likes
88
Quote:
SE535 is no more mid-centric than W4.
 
WOW i find that statement to be hardly true, to me both the se535 bronze and se535ltd-j to be far more mid centric sounding than that of the W4.
 
I'd recommend the SE535 but amp it and use the Westone star tips.  Compared to W4 which I just had for about 5 months.
 
  1. SE535 mids are much clearer, period.
  2. SE535 bass is a little bit fuller but not boosted or overdone in any way where W4 has a lower mid bump.
  3. SE535 is a little less analytical and a bit more fun and engaging.
 
 
These are the 3 main differences.  The soundstage size is about the same but I slightly prefer the SE535 (the left to right panning is sensational).  The SE535 goes louder and wont distort at really any volume if that matters to you.
 
The W4 treble extends a tad better but this is somewhat ineffective due to the veil.  I prefer a less extended treble with an exceptionally clear midrange over a more extended treble but an overall veil.

 
the mid range might sound clearer vs the w4 is becuase the 535 mids are forward closer, than the w4 which imo w4 mids are not forward.
 
i also dont hear this veil you speak of. i am using a upgrade cable so this might be why i dont hear the veil. i donno
 
May 16, 2013 at 8:14 PM Post #5 of 25

dqope21

New Head-Fier
Joined
Jun 15, 2012
Posts
25
Likes
10
Thanks for the feedback.  Does anyone have experience with the IEM's I mentioned vs the westone 4?  I really am looking for a step in another direction from the W4's. The sound really became lackluster after a short time for me and I would like something else.
 
May 16, 2013 at 9:44 PM Post #6 of 25

ericp10

Sits up all night comparing IEMs.
Joined
Nov 14, 2009
Posts
7,394
Likes
895
It's cheaper but I think just a half notch to a whole behind the W4 in sound quality>> BA200. If you have W4 tips, those will fit the BA200. For the price you can't do too much better.
 
May 17, 2013 at 3:15 AM Post #7 of 25

ericr

1000+ Head-Fier
Joined
Apr 19, 2008
Posts
1,414
Likes
223
Quote:
Thanks for the feedback.  Does anyone have experience with the IEM's I mentioned vs the westone 4?  I really am looking for a step in another direction from the W4's. The sound really became lackluster after a short time for me and I would like something else.

 
Hi dqope,
 
I've owned the W4 for about a 1 1/2 years and the SM64 for about 2 months.  From what you describe we seems we may hear the W4 the same way - classy, smooth --but, well, somehow just not overly compelling.  If this is true, I would highly recommend giving the SM64 serious consideration.  It's got a classy sound too, but can also be kick a**, or intimate -- or whatever the track calls for.
 
There is more bass than the W4 but it's tight, controlled with good detail.  As are the mids (no veiled lower-mids here).  And the treble, too.  This is what I like about it so much, bass-to-mids-to-treble the sound is consistent, cohesive, clear and detailed.
 
I've easlily done 100+ A/B comparisons between the two with a variety of music and genres.  Whenenver I start with the W4 I think "that's good!".  Then I switch to the '64 and think "Ahhhhh wow!"  Going the other way, when switching back to the W4, many times it's been "Wow that <whatever the prominant upper mid instrument/vocal of the current track is> really stands out compared to the SM64" -- followed about 30 seconds later by the realization it stands out because of the detail that is missing elsewhere.
 
BTW, did I mention they are detailed?  It's addicitive!  :p
 
Let me know if you have any questions and I'll do my best to answer.
 
   -Eric
 
May 17, 2013 at 4:04 AM Post #8 of 25

ericr

1000+ Head-Fier
Joined
Apr 19, 2008
Posts
1,414
Likes
223
Actually, it took a while to adjust to the '64s. At first hearing details showing up anywhere in the sound stage and across the entire frequency range was for sure unfamiliar and at times fairly distracting.
 
Then after a day or so...      it bacame addicting.
 
May 17, 2013 at 9:40 AM Post #10 of 25

dqope21

New Head-Fier
Joined
Jun 15, 2012
Posts
25
Likes
10
I'll check the SM64's out.  Is the Logitech UE 900 a good choice?  I've heard some good things about it.  I'd also like to clarify what I meant.  I think the W4's are awesome and the do everything well, but not any particular area exceptionally well.  The sound eventually became boring to me and unappealing.  I want something with an extra emphasis that'll keep things more exciting and interesting to listen to.
 
May 17, 2013 at 3:13 PM Post #11 of 25

ericr

1000+ Head-Fier
Joined
Apr 19, 2008
Posts
1,414
Likes
223
Quote:
I'll check the SM64's out.  Is the Logitech UE 900 a good choice?  I've heard some good things about it.  I'd also like to clarify what I meant.  I think the W4's are awesome and the do everything well, but not any particular area exceptionally well.  The sound eventually became boring to me and unappealing.  I want something with an extra emphasis that'll keep things more exciting and interesting to listen to.

 
This is exactly what the SM64 is (according to my ears)!  
 
Having bought the TF10 on Black Friday a couple of Thanksgivings ago I was very interested trying the UE 900, but thankfully, the SM64 has ended my IEM hunt (though I would still love to hear the UE 900).
 
FWIW, I also bought the Phonak 232 to try out and will be selling them this weekend.  They were very impressive too, but not worth spending the $$ vs. staying with the W4.
 
May 20, 2013 at 9:00 PM Post #13 of 25

czqdtc

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Nov 9, 2010
Posts
492
Likes
25
Quote:
The SM64 was way better to my ears than the W4.  Subjectivity is strong in this hobby.


I prefer W4 over SM64 by a big margin... The magical mids is not there, plus it is quite bright up-top and thin sounding. I returned my SM64 the next day... I prefer SM3V2 over the 64 anyday.
 
May 21, 2013 at 2:15 PM Post #15 of 25

SoundFreaq

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Apr 8, 2005
Posts
1,979
Likes
148
To the OP, what you're looking for is the SM64. It is amazing at what it can do. You cannot top it in that price range. To top it, you must spend much more. I preferred it vastly over the W4, and even my ES5. 
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top