thefitz
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- May 22, 2015
- Posts
- 2,167
- Likes
- 996
I went from a Jotunheim to the Mjolnir and frankly I found the Jotunheim brighter. I was actually surprised by the Mjolnir given its reputation for being bright - I didn't feel that it was overly bright at all.I guess they sound good with the Mjolnir v1 you have. What about any harshness in the High ? The mjolnir is quite unforgivable in the high (That's why i love it so much with the dark lcd3);
"Harsh" is a bit of an ambiguous term, but I'll say this - the Clear lives up to its name with the Mjolnir. It's bright without any peaks in the treble whatsoever. It's quite interesting. The brightness/clarity struck me when I started listening to this headphone, but when I put on notably harsh recordings (David Bowie: A Reality Tour), I was struck by how un-harsh it was.
I could listen to acoustic/jazz/soft recordings and notice how much air the tracks had. I'd then put on some heavy rock and metal and not attempt suicide like I did after listening to an HD700 and GS1000i.
Fascinating, really. I can't explain it. How can something be so clear without any peaks, harshness or sibilance... even if the tracks are notorious for peaks, harshness or sibilance?