[Steranko]

Did the Effect Audio Hades improve the speed of the bass? The Erlkonig is close to perfect for me, I find that the bass can be a bit faster~

Yes, the Hades was the only cable I found that improves the Erlkonig at all levels from bass to the highs. The Black Erlkonigs main strength is the mid and highs, not really strong on the bass. This cables enhances the sound more overall and gives it an even more cleaner sound. The bass and percussion sounds a lot better, from electronic bass and jazz funk bass to orchestral drums. I had tried the Horus X and even the Centurion but they did not work for me. I am using an LP6 TI to drive the power through it and sounds very solid which I think also makes a difference.I managed to locate the cable in a local shop and was surprised they had it considering it’s limited to about 30. This cable I was told was made specifically for the Erlkonig and to celebrate the10th Anniversary of EA doing business with DMA. 12 Core cable made with Gold, Copper alloy. Its quite costly but I think it was worth it.

 

[efftee]

[Cross posting from the Elysian thread]
An interesting discovery on the Annihilator//Venom cable, which I have been listening to since Canjam SG. First, on the 300 Max Ti; I didn't think it was all that good a match, too bright for my liking and though it should have enough power to feed the hungry Annihilator, I wasn't convince the juice was adequately floating the entire boat. The sound was lean-nish, not as weighty as I'd like and everything sounded (a hair) distant. It wasn't bad necessarily, and got better when I cranked up the volume. Some stuff, like EDM or anything pacy and pumping was nice, while classical, jazz and vocals were not. Frankly, I had higher expectations of such TOTL gear than what I am hearing.

The SP2K was next. Expectedly, it didn't have the power to drive the Annihilator, turning up the volume helped some but, really, it was more the loudness masking, not improving, the shortcomings. Though it didn't sound as lean, that distant, farther-away sound was still there.

On the DMP-Z1, the Annihilator started to flex its muscles. Volume wheel at around 11 o'clock (probably the highest I have had to turn it), the notes all had more substance, gone was the distant sound and I was really enjoying all genre of music — classical, jazz and vocals included! I was quite amazed at how well the Annihilator scaled. It was almost a completely differently IEM from what I had heard the days before. But just when I thought the Annihilator had reached its height with the DMP-Z1, I was blown away when I next listened on the HM1000 Quad (R2R on 4x PCM1704), amped by the Aroma A100TB+PS100!

The notes were crisper and clearer; for better or worse, greater resolution, more details, improved soundstage -- not bigger, but real-er as opposed to the somewhat artificial sound from overdone soundstage expansion -- all in all, a more realistic and analogue impression. In contrast, it made the DMP-Z1 sound a little anemic and digital, like the notes were rounded off in some antialiasing process, from which the music was rendered to be smoother, more pleasant. Not an altogether bad thing, especially with substandard material, but having heard the Annihilator on the HM1K, I know now, at what cost...

TL;DR: In summary, Annihilator owners, feed it lots and lots of power to milk its full potential, the reward will be worth it even if an external amp was needed; pick the DAC to render your preferred sound -- the Annihilator will please your every whim and fancy from any genre you please. With the right source, the Annihilator (on Venom especially) is easily one the best IEMs I have heard.

Ps. Had a quick chat last night with Lee about my assessment. Whilst it amazed me how well it scaled, much better than the Traillii or Odin (on Orpheus no less), I ask why he had made the Annihilator so fussy and if he was nuts to exact such incredulous demands on the source?! It seemed the culprit was the Sonion EST, which we all know, is notoriously difficult to drive. But hadn’t others tamed it in their hybrids and tribrids? Well, in an abridged version according to Lee, let’s just say he could have (copped out and) tuned the BAs and DDs separately to make the Annihilator easier to enjoy; after all, it wouldn't have made it an apparently lesser IEM by any standards. Instead, ever the perfectionist, he chose to tune the BA and DD sensitivities down to match the EST in order to achieve technical balance, but in so doing, added to the Sonion (king's) ransom on power!

I don't know whether to applaud his integrity for sticking to his professional ideals or chide him for frustrating customers with his romantic philosophies. I guess that depends on whether one is willing to settle for a compromised IEM tuned to make it more popular with the mass or nothing less than a true TOTLer that, when the challenge it poses is overcome, is capable of delivering at the lofty level where not words but only music can relate. Can't speak for others but I am very pleased indeed, to have the Annihilator… the way it is.

 

[mvvRAZ]

[Cross posting from the Elysian thread]
An interesting discovery on the Annihilator//Venom cable, which I have been listening to since Canjam SG. First, on the 300 Max Ti; I didn't think it was all that good a match, too bright for my liking and though it should have enough power to feed the hungry Annihilator, I wasn't convince the juice was adequately floating the entire boat. The sound was lean-nish, not as weighty as I'd like and everything sounded (a hair) distant. It wasn't bad necessarily, and got better when I cranked up the volume. Some stuff, like EDM or anything pacy and pumping was nice, while classical, jazz and vocals were not. Frankly, I had higher expectations of such TOTL gear than what I am hearing.

The SP2K was next. Expectedly, it didn't have the power to drive the Annihilator, turning up the volume helped some but, really, it was more the loudness masking, not improving, the shortcomings. Though it didn't sound as lean, that distant, farther-away sound was still there.

On the DMP-Z1, the Annihilator started to flex its muscles. Volume wheel at around 11 o'clock (probably the highest I have had to turn it), the notes all had more substance, gone was the distant sound and I was really enjoying all genre of music — classical, jazz and vocals included! I was quite amazed at how well the Annihilator scaled. It was almost a completely differently IEM from what I had heard the days before. But just when I thought the Annihilator had reached its height with the DMP-Z1, I was blown away when I next listened on the HM1000 Quad (R2R on 4x PCM1704), amped by the Aroma A100TB+PS100!

The notes were crisper and clearer; for better or worse, greater resolution, more details, improved soundstage -- not bigger, but real-er as opposed to the somewhat artificial sound from overdone soundstage expansion -- all in all, a more realistic and analogue impression. In contrast, it made the DMP-Z1 sound a little anemic and digital, like the notes were rounded off in some antialiasing process, from which the music was rendered to be smoother, more pleasant. Not an altogether bad thing, especially with substandard material, but having heard the Annihilator on the HM1K, I know now, at what cost...

TL;DR: In summary, Annihilator owners, feed it lots and lots of power to milk its full potential, the reward will be worth it even if an external amp was needed; pick the DAC to render your preferred sound -- the Annihilator will please your every whim and fancy from any genre you please. With the right source, the Annihilator (on Venom especially) is easily one the best IEMs I have heard.

Ps. Had a quick chat last night with Lee about my assessment. Whilst it amazed me how well it scaled, much better than the Traillii or Odin (on Orpheus no less), I ask why he had made the Annihilator so fussy and if he was nuts to exact such incredulous demands on the source?! It seemed the culprit was the Sonion EST, which we all know, is notoriously difficult to drive. But hadn’t others tamed it in their hybrids and tribrids? Well, in an abridged version according to Lee, let’s just say he could have (copped out and) tuned the BAs and DDs separately to make the Annihilator easier to enjoy; after all, it wouldn't have made it an apparently lesser IEM by any standards. Instead, ever the perfectionist, he chose to tune the BA and DD sensitivities down to match the EST in order to achieve technical balance, but in so doing, added to the Sonion (king's) ransom on power!

I don't know whether to applaud his integrity for sticking to his professional ideals or chide him for frustrating customers with his romantic philosophies. I guess that depends on whether one is willing to settle for a compromised IEM tuned to make it more popular with the mass or nothing less than a true TOTLer that, when the challenge it poses is overcome, is capable of delivering at the lofty level where not words but only music can relate. Can't speak for others but I am very pleased indeed, to have the Annihilator… the way it is.

Absolutely love the design you went for, that turquoise especially

 

[Animagus]

Hey guys! Here is my review of Lime Ears' new €3400 flagship 1DD+8BA+4EST tri-brid IEM - Anima, with comparisons to previous LE flagships Pneuma and Aether R as well as IEMs from Empire Ears, Vision Ears and 64 Audio, whatever I could do with the time I had on hand since I've been keeping very busy with work. Will add more as soon as I can. Let me know if you're interested in comparisons with specific IEMs. I'll try making it happen if I've heard them or try getting my hands on a unit. Happy reading, cheers!

PS - I've also created a Lime Ears Master thread here on Head-fi to combine all discussions and impressions related to Lime Ears' IEMs in one thread. Easier to keep a track of all things LE that way.

Lime Ears Anima
​

 

[Deezel177]

Hey guys! Here is my detailed review of Lime Ears' new €3400 flagship 1DD+8BA+4EST tri-brid IEM - Anima, with comparisons to previous LE flagships Pneuma and Aether R as well as IEMs from Empire Ears, Vision Ears and 64 Audio. Happy reading, cheers!

PS - I've also created a Lime Ears Master thread here on Head-fi to combine all discussions and impressions related to Lime Ears' IEMs in one thread. Easier to keep a track of all things LE.

Lime Ears Anima
​

Awesome stuff, man! 'Pretty much agree with everything you've said on it. You make an interesting point about the pinna gain rise starting at 1kHz, because it's one of the main things that differentiate the Anima from the VE PHoNIX. The former almost has the latter's rises and dips, but transposed to the left. So, it has a sub-bass boost, upper-bass decline, then low-mid rise, while the PHoNIX has a mid-bass boost, low-mid decline, then a 1kHz rise. It changes the note-body-to-warmth ratio within their respective timbres, resulting in two different interpretations of neutral-natural. But, yeah, good stuff, indeed, and see if Alex can loan you the PHoNIX for a week or two.

 

[Animagus]

Awesome stuff, man! 'Pretty much agree with everything you've said on it. You make an interesting point about the pinna gain rise starting at 1kHz, because it's one of the main things that differentiate the Anima from the VE PHoNIX. The former almost has the latter's rises and dips, but transposed to the left. So, it has a sub-bass boost, upper-bass decline, then low-mid rise, while the PHoNIX has a mid-bass boost, low-mid decline, then a 1kHz rise. It changes the note-body-to-warmth ratio within their respective timbres, resulting in two different interpretations of neutral-natural. But, yeah, good stuff, indeed, and see if Alex can loan you the PHoNIX for a week or two.

Thanks man! Oh if only shuttling stuff between Alex and I was that quick and easy. We're in different countries and custom clearance + taxes here are a bank breaking-punch in the face when expensive stuff gets caught and detained! Quite a sad scene otherwise it would've made for quite a lot more content between us. I've seen Phonix's graph. Yeah it has boosted mid-bass, upper-bass and slightly fuller lower-midrange, not something I would call neutral, quite far from it, but can imagine it making for a fun listen for people who like that kind of fuller bodied tuning. I've heard quite a lot of stuff tuned that way but I personally am a reference head and like a ruler flat midrange till 1kHz and a proper pinna gain peak rise after. Phonix's linear non-dipped lower-treble to mid-treble tuning is quite cool and interesting though. Regardless, I've had an eye out for Phonix, wishing someone in my circle gets one...am always interested and intrigued by Vision Ears stuff.

 

[Kerouac]

And here we go! Although this is my 2nd review this year, it is also only my 5th one since 2015. So, I don't consider myself to be some sort of 'professional' reviewer at all. But if you take the time to read this one and listen to the music that comes on your path while doing so, then I hope that my passion for this hobby (as I've put my heart and soul into it over the past few weeks) will shine through.

I'm also aware that it's quite a long read and that there are many out there that do prefer a 'more technical and to the point' type of review. However, this is simply my personal approach (trying to create an atmosphere around an IEM) at this moment, and I decided to stick with that.

The good news for those who don't like this style, is that this could turn out to be my last and final review ever. Which also might become obvious by its closing part.

Anyway, I hope that most of you, who decide to read it, will enjoy the EA Axiom Tour:
https://www.head-fi.org/showcase/effect-audio-axiom.25610/reviews#review-28376

Cheers and have a great weekend!

 

[tawmizzzz]

Posted the review on Jewel's official review thread: https://www.head-fi.org/showcase/aroma-audio-jewel.25790/reviews#review-28390

The Bird Finds a Rare Jewel:


(Blue Tiger camo...COD anyone?)

Introduction:

The hunt for a TOTL that could replace Traillii has been an extensive effort-one that likely is annoying at this point for others who do take the time to reads my mini-reviews.

So let me skip the foreplay and just cut to the chase: Elysian X almost clipped the bird, but the lack of the lower-midrange made it more of a specialist IEM than an all-rounder, so the bird got the final worm. Phönix didn’t outfly the bird. But the Jewel...thanks for complicating my life.

Simply put, Aroma hit it out of the park with this one. Let’s ignore the pitiful cable-it’s thinner than an audiophile’s patience for their new toys. The “cables” bright and thin profile is as accurate physically as it is sonically-it really does the Jewel’s sound signature no favors. Therefore, all impressions below will be based off the PWA 4W 1960 cable.

Sound:

Jewel opts for a more revealing tonality that still blends musical elements, mainly in its extremely cohesive staging and clean, hefty bass response. There is a slight sensuality in the midrange despite the wallops of detail. Jewel portrays an upper-mids emphasis that can be a bit fatiguing depending on your sources and tolerances. It is not the smoothest upper-midrange I’ve heard, but I quickly got used to it and appreciated the extra energy in that region to compliment the Jewel’s clarity proficiency. Jewel leans slightly on the brighter side of neutral, but can be reigned in depending on tips and warmer sources.

Bass: I’ve denied that I might be a slight basshead for too long. With my recent dabbling with TOTL Headphone planars and EQ’d low-shelf bass boosts, if the bass doesn’t rumble or slam, I get sad. Fortunately, no sadness here-Jewel has arguably a top 3 bass response I’ve heard from any IEM.

Its’ elevation is rather modest than let’s say EVO, but it is extremely clean with excellent punch when the track asks for it. With Crystal eartips, I would pop in my favorite bass tracks and hear tremendous detail and pleasing slam with virtually no bleed into the lower mids. Speaking of the devil, Jewel’s lower-midrange adds a real heftiness and authenticity to bass drum hits and other percussive instruments, which only further proves why a properly implemented dynamic driver for the lows is, *chef’s kiss*.

For those who want dirty or ultra elevated bass, I am not sure if Jewel will fit the bill. But if you want one of the best DD lows in an IEM that performs at a summit-fi level, Jewel needs to be at the top of your list.

Mids: At first I was a bit surprised at the forward upper-midrange. It’s a region that I’ve gotten a bit more sensitive with over time. But with a cable swap and some brain burn-in, I began to appreciate the detail and transparency in the midrange. It’s not particularly thick, nor thin, but as Goldilocks once said, “it’s just right”. Vocals are natural with nice air between the notes. Female vocals are emphasized a bit higher than male, but the scruffy and growly male vocals are just as enjoyable. Instrument timbre is one of the best I’ve heard in an IEM, but with the clarity signature, you lose a bit of the special low-level detail on stringed instruments. It sounds natural, but the lack of warmth compared to something like Traillii still has Jewel a tier below on overall timbre.

Treble: For a slightly bright IEM, the treble is relatively lax. There is excellent upper treble and overall air across the frequencies, but there is not much lower treble (much like on the Traillii). There is a huge dip at 6k which I think adds a bit more emphasis onto the boosted-upper mids. That being said, there is nice sparkle and energy up top. Cymbals sounds nice, synth notes are enjoyable. It won’t touch the Elysian X for treble (and to be honest, I haven’t heard an IEM that can), but Jewel’s upper frequencies should be suitable for most folks who aren’t true trebleheads. Tons of details up top with nice naturalness.

Soundstage + Technicalities: Two words: Summit…Fi. Soundstage is one of the most cohesive I’ve heard, portrayed in an addicting, engaging spherical stage. Imaging is incredible, allowing you to follow a myriad of instruments across the song, even on complex tracks. The stage depth allows a lot of room between the notes, with some modest stage height for that enjoyment. Width is not the largest, especially compared to the Traillii, but regardless, the width seamlessly blends into the rest of the axes.

Oh…and dynamics? ****ing awesome. The punch and defined transients is truly addicting. The overall sounds just reminds me of what a solid-state AMP would do to a referential monitor. This might be a good time to suggest that powerful desktop sources enhance how authoritative the Jewel can really sound.

What Weighs More-a Bird or a Jewel?



Switching it up from my typical A/B on general sound impressions, I decided to pit the two across a variety of songs. The impressions consistently portray what I find the biggest differences between the two:

Traillii wins in soundstage width, Jewel wins in depth and height. Bird comes across as “flatter” on the soundstage plane, meanwhile Jewel goes for a spherical staging with more fleshed out transients and notes. The flatter presentation on the bird allows for a more “intimate” and richer experience for vocals and instruments. It is still king for timbre in the midrange, with more euphoric texture on stringed instruments.

That being said, Jewel wins in realism in the lows, especially for drums or for genres that benefit from macro dynamics. The dynamic discrepancy is very noticeable in an A/B, and made me realize Jewel is killer for rock, metal, and pop. Jewel’s DD bass is more realistic with an equal 1:1 mid to subbass ratio, meanwhile Bird’s midbass seems more plasticky and goes for a 2:3 midbass to subbass ratio (more subbass emphasis). Treble is similar in that the lower treble is laxer, but due to Traillii’s more reigned in upper-mids, I hear more treble sparkle shining through Bird’s darker top end. Jewel is likely a bit more detailed and better imaging due to soundstage depth, but bird still layers better.


Track Shootout:

Both IEMs were compared from 1960 4W cable and off the IDSD Pro Signature (solid-state mode). Jewel strongly benefits from more power and does have more potential to scale than bird does.

1. Anomalities in Heart Rate-Original Mix

Jewel’s dynamic driver exhibits more authentic, tighter and precise midbass thumps against Bird. Bird’s bass sounds a bit dirtier with a subbass decay emphasis, but the slams do not punch you as hard. Bird’s stage expands wider, but jewel has the depth advantage, more spherical as bird comes across as a bit flatter (putting sounds closer to you). A touch more sparkle on bird but more energy in upper mids from jewel.

*Winner*: Jewel. I use this song for staging immersion and abyssal depths of bass. Jewel’s DD nails it.


2. Pontos de Exclamacão (Vintage Culture & Future)

Bird sounds sweeter, a bit more sensual, but clarity is a touch higher on Jewel. There is more of a tunnel depth to the notes on Jewel. Instruments like the trumpet and strings have more warmth on bird which gives off the more “musical” timbre. Bird’s instruments have more texture. Both excellent

*Winner: Bird. I love acoustic guitar and the Traillii’s timbre is still king---instruments and vocals are sweet and rich. Where are the tissues at? :’)


3. Raven (GoGo Penguin):

Jewel: excellent drum punch, does nice job imaging the centre focused rapid drums while imaging the offset piano keys. Great detail, good speed, balances without the overlap that many IEMs struggle with.

Bird: instrument plucks linger a bit longer, more warmth again in the instruments. A bit smoother but that’s usually price you pay for slight loss of clarity that jewel has. Imaging feels more precise on jewel, but bird layers the coexisting drums and piano solo nicely. More flat, less depth. Less percussive weight on the hits, Jewel does the drums better due to DD authenticity. But pianos are sweeter, richer on Bird. Jewel does speed better I think due to being a tighter focus.

*Winner*: Tied. Two differing but excellent portrayals of one of my favorite songs. Jewel for the dynamics and percussive focus, Traillii for the piano emphasis.


4. Nutshell (Live at the Majestic Theatre, Brooklyn, NY)

Jewel: Excellent right hand acoustic guitar, can pinpoint audience crowd cheering as the bass line slowly chugs in from the mid-stage.

Bird: more emphasis in initial crowd cheering, acoustic guitar timbre is richer but less properly imaged on the far right (3 o’clock) than jewel. All imaged on a flatter y axis but excellent x-axis. A bit darker overall, more of a smokey, warm lighting environment. Vocals more emphasized

*Winner*: I preferred the Traillii’s intimacy and warmth for this one, but Jewel sounds more hi-fi and offers a more detailed rendition.


5. Dethrone-Bad Omens

Bird: Drum hits feel a bit lacking, this is an ultra dynamic song and bird feels soft on it for sure. The intro breakdown is supposed to make you headbang, and bird falls flat on its face. Cymbals have that nice sparkle though although muted on lower treble initial impact

Jewel: more heft on the bass, better punch on the breakdown (helps with the intended head banging) nature. Brighter, a little less forgiving. More detail on the cymbals but less of an enjoyable sparkle.

*Winner*: Jewel. I use this song to test dynamics and aggressiveness/energy in drum hits. Bird is noticeably soft here, meanwhile Jewel’s DD and lower midrange provide the impact for the song to properly amp you up.

6. Asilos Magdalena-The Mars Volta (*using the SP2000 DAP for this one)

Bird: Incredible. So rich, emotional, the vocals are haunting, intimate, detailed. The guitars are imaged nicely on the width axis, can hear every pluck.

Jewel: more out of head, less intimate due to depth. less warmth, more hi-fi sounding. Mature vocals, more detached sounding.

*Winner*: Bird. This song and pairing reminds me why Bird has permanently nested a spot in my heart. There is something magical about its synergy with the SP2000 CU. The midrange has a glow of musical timbre, texture and sensuality.



Recap: There should be room for both in the Bird’s nest, and I can’t confidently say one is better than the other. It’ll come down to sources and preferences-I’ll always pick up Traillii to pair with my SP2000 CU for the romantic, textured mids, but Jewel would easily win if I am listening to dynamic tracks like rock, metal, EDM and/or just want more of that hi-fi experience.



Summary:

IEM prices are getting more and more acid-reflux inducing…but being privileged enough to listen to most of the TOTLs in the $3-6k range, I can happily confirm that Jewel performs true to its summit-fi status. Yes, it should be paired with a better stock cable as it clearly bottlenecks the Jewel’s potential, but I guess Aroma is assuming anyone spending $5k on an IEM will already have their favorite TOTL cables to roll with. Ultimately I can see why some folks prefer Jewel to Traillii---depending on my mood or genres, I do too.

I know Traillii was getting all the "HiFiMAN Susvara of IEMs" comparisons, which I can kind of see in terms of having a pleasant, balanced presentation- but to my ears, the Jewel is the true mini-susvara. More clarity focused with nice but authentic bass. It's not as effortless or linear as the Susvara, but it performs at the top of the IEM game much like the Sus does in the HP world.

TL;DR: Jewel is appropriately named---a rare-find jewel that is crystal clear in its tonality with enough shimmer and smoothness to bring a smile to your face. Just bring a different cable and feed it power to make it shine best

 

[stacey]

Did you give it a spin with your W2 also?

 

[tawmizzzz]

Did you give it a spin with your W2 also?

Yeah briefly-the 131 was nicer for adding warmth but you lose some dynamics/bit softer. The OG W2 was a bit too much in the upper-mids due to stock Jewel sig + the OG W2 tonality, but great black background with nice punch and subbass emphasis.

 

[HiFiHawaii808]

The Bird Finds a Rare Jewel:


(Blue Tiger camo...COD anyone?)

Introduction:

The hunt for a TOTL that could replace Traillii has been an extensive effort-one that likely is annoying at this point for others who do take the time to reads my mini-reviews.

So let me skip the foreplay and just cut to the chase: Elysian X almost clipped the bird, but the lack of the lower-midrange made it more of a specialist IEM than an all-rounder, so the bird got the final worm. Phönix didn’t outfly the bird. But the Jewel...thanks for complicating my life.

Simply put, Aroma hit it out of the park with this one. Let’s ignore the pitiful cable-it’s thinner than an audiophile’s patience for their new toys. The “cables” bright and thin profile is as accurate physically as it is sonically-it really does the Jewel’s sound signature no favors. Therefore, all impressions below will be based off the PWA 4W 1960 cable.

Sound:

Jewel opts for a more revealing tonality that still blends musical elements, mainly in its extremely cohesive staging and clean, hefty bass response. There is a slight sensuality in the midrange despite the wallops of detail. Jewel portrays an upper-mids emphasis that can be a bit fatiguing depending on your sources and tolerances. It is not the smoothest upper-midrange I’ve heard, but I quickly got used to it and appreciated the extra energy in that region to compliment the Jewel’s clarity proficiency. Jewel leans slightly on the brighter side of neutral, but can be reigned in depending on tips and warmer sources.

Bass: I’ve denied that I might be a slight basshead for too long. With my recent dabbling with TOTL Headphone planars and EQ’d low-shelf bass boosts, if the bass doesn’t rumble or slam, I get sad. Fortunately, no sadness here-Jewel has arguably a top 3 bass response I’ve heard from any IEM.

Its’ elevation is rather modest than let’s say EVO, but it is extremely clean with excellent punch when the track asks for it. With Crystal eartips, I would pop in my favorite bass tracks and hear tremendous detail and pleasing slam with virtually no bleed into the lower mids. Speaking of the devil, Jewel’s lower-midrange adds a real heftiness and authenticity to bass drum hits and other percussive instruments, which only further proves why a properly implemented dynamic driver for the lows is, *chef’s kiss*.

For those who want dirty or ultra elevated bass, I am not sure if Jewel will fit the bill. But if you want one of the best DD lows in an IEM that performs at a summit-fi level, Jewel needs to be at the top of your list.

Mids: At first I was a bit surprised at the forward upper-midrange. It’s a region that I’ve gotten a bit more sensitive with over time. But with a cable swap and some brain burn-in, I began to appreciate the detail and transparency in the midrange. It’s not particularly thick, nor thin, but as Goldilocks once said, “it’s just right”. Vocals are natural with nice air between the notes. Female vocals are emphasized a bit higher than male, but the scruffy and growly male vocals are just as enjoyable. Instrument timbre is one of the best I’ve heard in an IEM, but with the clarity signature, you lose a bit of the special low-level detail on stringed instruments. It sounds natural, but the lack of warmth compared to something like Traillii still has Jewel a tier below on overall timbre.

Treble: For a slightly bright IEM, the treble is relatively lax. There is excellent upper treble and overall air across the frequencies, but there is not much lower treble (much like on the Traillii). There is a huge dip at 6k which I think adds a bit more emphasis onto the boosted-upper mids. That being said, there is nice sparkle and energy up top. Cymbals sounds nice, synth notes are enjoyable. It won’t touch the Elysian X for treble (and to be honest, I haven’t heard an IEM that can), but Jewel’s upper frequencies should be suitable for most folks who aren’t true trebleheads. Tons of details up top with nice naturalness.

Soundstage + Technicalities: Two words: Summit…Fi. Soundstage is one of the most cohesive I’ve heard, portrayed in an addicting, engaging spherical stage. Imaging is incredible, allowing you to follow a myriad of instruments across the song, even on complex tracks. The stage depth allows a lot of room between the notes, with some modest stage height for that enjoyment. Width is not the largest, especially compared to the Traillii, but regardless, the width seamlessly blends into the rest of the axes.

Oh…and dynamics? ****ing awesome. The punch and defined transients is truly addicting. The overall sounds just reminds me of what a solid-state AMP would do to a referential monitor. This might be a good time to suggest that powerful desktop sources enhance how authoritative the Jewel can really sound.

What Weighs More-a Bird or a Jewel?



Switching it up from my typical A/B on general sound impressions, I decided to pit the two across a variety of songs. The impressions consistently portray what I find the biggest differences between the two:

Traillii wins in soundstage width, Jewel wins in depth and height. Bird comes across as “flatter” on the soundstage plane, meanwhile Jewel goes for a spherical staging with more fleshed out transients and notes. The flatter presentation on the bird allows for a more “intimate” and richer experience for vocals and instruments. It is still king for timbre in the midrange, with more euphoric texture on stringed instruments.

That being said, Jewel wins in realism in the lows, especially for drums or for genres that benefit from macro dynamics. The dynamic discrepancy is very noticeable in an A/B, and made me realize Jewel is killer for rock, metal, and pop. Jewel’s DD bass is more realistic with an equal 1:1 mid to subbass ratio, meanwhile Bird’s midbass seems more plasticky and goes for a 2:3 midbass to subbass ratio (more subbass emphasis). Treble is similar in that the lower treble is laxer, but due to Traillii’s more reigned in upper-mids, I hear more treble sparkle shining through Bird’s darker top end. Jewel is likely a bit more detailed and better imaging due to soundstage depth, but bird still layers better.


Track Shootout:

Both IEMs were compared from 1960 4W cable and off the IDSD Pro Signature (solid-state mode). Jewel strongly benefits from more power and does have more potential to scale than bird does.

1. Anomalities in Heart Rate-Original Mix

Jewel’s dynamic driver exhibits more authentic, tighter and precise midbass thumps against Bird. Bird’s bass sounds a bit dirtier with a subbass decay emphasis, but the slams do not punch you as hard. Bird’s stage expands wider, but jewel has the depth advantage, more spherical as bird comes across as a bit flatter (putting sounds closer to you). A touch more sparkle on bird but more energy in upper mids from jewel.

*Winner*: Jewel. I use this song for staging immersion and abyssal depths of bass. Jewel’s DD nails it.


2. Pontos de Exclamacão (Vintage Culture & Future)

Bird sounds sweeter, a bit more sensual, but clarity is a touch higher on Jewel. There is more of a tunnel depth to the notes on Jewel. Instruments like the trumpet and strings have more warmth on bird which gives off the more “musical” timbre. Bird’s instruments have more texture. Both excellent

*Winner: Bird. I love acoustic guitar and the Traillii’s timbre is still king---instruments and vocals are sweet and rich. Where are the tissues at? :’)


3. Raven (GoGo Penguin):

Jewel: excellent drum punch, does nice job imaging the centre focused rapid drums while imaging the offset piano keys. Great detail, good speed, balances without the overlap that many IEMs struggle with.

Bird: instrument plucks linger a bit longer, more warmth again in the instruments. A bit smoother but that’s usually price you pay for slight loss of clarity that jewel has. Imaging feels more precise on jewel, but bird layers the coexisting drums and piano solo nicely. More flat, less depth. Less percussive weight on the hits, Jewel does the drums better due to DD authenticity. But pianos are sweeter, richer on Bird. Jewel does speed better I think due to being a tighter focus.

*Winner*: Tied. Two differing but excellent portrayals of one of my favorite songs. Jewel for the dynamics and percussive focus, Traillii for the piano emphasis.


4. Nutshell (Live at the Majestic Theatre, Brooklyn, NY)

Jewel: Excellent right hand acoustic guitar, can pinpoint audience crowd cheering as the bass line slowly chugs in from the mid-stage.

Bird: more emphasis in initial crowd cheering, acoustic guitar timbre is richer but less properly imaged on the far right (3 o’clock) than jewel. All imaged on a flatter y axis but excellent x-axis. A bit darker overall, more of a smokey, warm lighting environment. Vocals more emphasized

*Winner*: I preferred the Traillii’s intimacy and warmth for this one, but Jewel sounds more hi-fi and offers a more detailed rendition.


5. Dethrone-Bad Omens

Bird: Drum hits feel a bit lacking, this is an ultra dynamic song and bird feels soft on it for sure. The intro breakdown is supposed to make you headbang, and bird falls flat on its face. Cymbals have that nice sparkle though although muted on lower treble initial impact

Jewel: more heft on the bass, better punch on the breakdown (helps with the intended head banging) nature. Brighter, a little less forgiving. More detail on the cymbals but less of an enjoyable sparkle.

*Winner*: Jewel. I use this song to test dynamics and aggressiveness/energy in drum hits. Bird is noticeably soft here, meanwhile Jewel’s DD and lower midrange provide the impact for the song to properly amp you up.

6. Asilos Magdalena-The Mars Volta (*using the SP2000 DAP for this one)

Bird: Incredible. So rich, emotional, the vocals are haunting, intimate, detailed. The guitars are imaged nicely on the width axis, can hear every pluck.

Jewel: more out of head, less intimate due to depth. less warmth, more hi-fi sounding. Mature vocals, more detached sounding.

*Winner*: Bird. This song and pairing reminds me why Bird has permanently nested a spot in my heart. There is something magical about its synergy with the SP2000 CU. The midrange has a glow of musical timbre, texture and sensuality.



Recap: There should be room for both in the Bird’s nest, and I can’t confidently say one is better than the other. It’ll come down to sources and preferences-I’ll always pick up Traillii to pair with my SP2000 CU for the romantic, textured mids, but Jewel would easily win if I am listening to dynamic tracks like rock, metal, EDM and/or just want more of that hi-fi experience.



Summary:

IEM prices are getting more and more acid-reflux inducing…but being privileged enough to listen to most of the TOTLs in the $3-6k range, I can happily confirm that Jewel performs true to its summit-fi status. Yes, it should be paired with a better stock cable as it clearly bottlenecks the Jewel’s potential, but I guess Aroma is assuming anyone spending $5k on an IEM will already have their favorite TOTL cables to roll with. Ultimately I can see why some folks prefer Jewel to Traillii---depending on my mood or genres, I do too.

TL;DR: Jewel is appropriately named---a rare-find jewel that is crystal clear in its tonality with enough shimmer and smoothness to bring a smile to your face. Just bring a different cable and feed it power to make best it shine best

Nice review. I am one of those who prefer Jewel over Traillii. I prefer its DD bass and it's upper mids and treble. They are both deserving of their summit fi designation and preferences will determine which one a given individual likes more.

 

[bluestorm1992]

Not as skilled as some fellows here, but here it is!

BTW, Jewel is really freaking good. The only complaint to me is the cable lol.

 

[HiFiHawaii808]

Not as skilled as some fellows here, but here it is!

BTW, Jewel is really freaking good. The only complaint to me is the cable lol.

It is great, isn't it?

 

[rantng]

Custom UM Indigo available (limited to 20 sets) - https://shop.musicteck.com/collecti...indigo-limited-20-sets?variant=39744228556862

 

[proedros]

we lost a music legend yesterday