Of course it is, but it's still a truism.
To one person it's not good value, to another is it. It's value is still determined by the buyer and of course that is subjective.
Everyone has different levels of acceptance. Ultimately if the buyer is happy with the price and the goods are acceptable, then its value is acceptable.
To me the price here is fine so my subjective valuation is acceptable to me, experience and knowledge makes little difference. To another the unit is overpriced or underpriced altering the value in their eyes, but only their eyes.
Objectivity is based on neutrality, prejudice or bias, not value based on subjective valuation.
To one person it's not good value, to another is it. It's value is still determined by the buyer and of course that is subjective.
Everyone has different levels of acceptance. Ultimately if the buyer is happy with the price and the goods are acceptable, then its value is acceptable.
To me the price here is fine so my subjective valuation is acceptable to me, experience and knowledge makes little difference. To another the unit is overpriced or underpriced altering the value in their eyes, but only their eyes.
Objectivity is based on neutrality, prejudice or bias, not value based on subjective valuation.
That's sort of subjective though. An item that's overpriced may seem like a good deal to an inexperienced buyer but objectively it's not a good deal.
Last edited: