I say the LZ A7 (red-pop) is the closest to that.
hello, this is my EQ for the FH3,
could you recommend iem with this sound signature,
so, more lower mid, less upper mid, less treble under 10kHz, more upper treble (after 10kHz)
thank you,
@RikudouGoku @IEMusic @Dsnuts @felix3650
I really like the Mangird Tea. I listen to it almost as much as I do the MEST. That being said, with the rate things are coming out in Chi-Fi, you may want to just sit back, relax, and enjoy tunes on your excellent T2+ and FH3 for now. Just keep up with all the new stuff, and wait till something irresistible catches your eye/ear. I personally don’t find any major weaknesses with either the T2+ or FH3.
I have the Starfield, BL03 and FH3. All respond well depending on the source you feed them with. FH3 loves Mojo/Poly, but hisses like a snake with Tera Player. the Starfield and BL03 can do well with Tera Player, but Mojo/Poly sounds better with the FH3. Synergy with your other components is important and can change your perception greatly
I can‘t think of anything that would be exactly that. Other than the upper treble extension, perhaps the Final Audio E3000 would work. Maybe the Shozy Form 1.1, except for the 8 KHz peak. The ones that I can think of that would fit the best, with treble extension, but probably a little more upper mids or treble than you find ideal, are the UM MEST, Sony IER-M7, M9, and Z1R. They are a lot more pricy though. As @RikudouGoku mentioned, there is the LZ A7, as it is tunable.
hello, this is my EQ for the FH3,
could you recommend iem with this sound signature,
so, more lower mid, less upper mid, less treble under 10kHz, more upper treble (after 10kHz)
thank you,
@RikudouGoku @IEMusic @Dsnuts @felix3650
You can just get it on Amazon in the US.
yes the A7 should be the closest.
can you give a brief comparison between these three? I have the bl03, dont know how much of an upgrade ll the fh3 be considering almost 4 times the price.
Diminishing returns will make it so you wont get a 4x times increase in SQ even if you are paying 4x the price.
If I had to choose one of the 3 it would be Starfield because it works the best with all the playback sources I own. Like I said previously, synergy is an important factor (for me). If my only source was Mojo/Poly I would pick FH3, but I own multiple portables and each brings something unique to my ears. BL03 is good to knock around with and not worry if they get roughed up, but I would rank them last of the 3 according to my ears
It's always about proportions and about what you value the most in sound quality. It all depends if that upgrade is going to make it worth it for you or not.
My ears really don't play well with QDC connectors, I haven't had one yet that hasn't had the ear guides ripping them out or preventing a good seating. But other than the cable the fit and comfort of the NM2+ seem great. Isolation not the best. Insertion depth changes the sound dramatically for me, so tip rolling is definitely advised. I didn't listen to the NM2+ long enough to give a really thorough comparison, but off the bat it seemed like the bass was of a similar quality though closer to neutral in quantity on the NM2+ compared to the FH3. The mids had more body on the FH3 but more texture on the NM2+. The treble was way more forward on the NM2+, but this brings along a greater perception of detail. Like I said I found the NM2+ treble a little brittle, but YMMV. Stage and imaging slightly better on the NM2+ but not by as much as I had expected. But this was without any burn-in on the NM2+ so if you're a believer my impressions may not be correct.
Yeah metal is basically the one genre I never listen to. I like the T2+ for acoustic and instrumental music, the treble is a little airier than the FH3 which is nice sometimes.
That is my plan, just fighting with the GAS!
