I have lived with the FXA11 for a few days now. O man it is meant to complement my main rig with my U18 and holy crap they must belong to different universes.....
The DD is a subwoofer on steroids.......mids and highs, vocals etc are nicely done and sounds much fuller than the Dorado but at any time of the listening your attention would invariably be drawn to the mamooth bass. Distracting? Quite. Bass well done? Wooly for the first 10-20 hours but then it tightens up quite a bit and shows good bass texture - still ooooooo that fat bass. Rumble? In such abundance no one can possibly ask for more otherwise your ears would bleed. A basshead's flagship (finally) perhaps?
Great for morning commute to wake you up. Bad for after work chill.....would probably get a headache and can't sleep.
FXA9 or FXA11? 11 any day. The FXA9 is still very much in the "what's the point" bracket. At the very least, the 11 got character you could admire, no matter you like that or not. The 9? It's a nobody except the glittery good looks.
Now see if the DD would evolve further. Still VERY interested and waiting for Dale & Co to explain the inner goodness, what's so special with the DD used and the driver/crossover orientations etc.
Thank you for the write-up How does it compare to Vega and the old 2.5s? And does it play nicely with the wm1z on balanced?