ken36
Good stuff!
- Joined
- May 21, 2005
- Posts
- 17,416
- Likes
- 12
As a dog lover, I hate this guy. Why do so many with world class ability, bring shame on us all?
Originally Posted by lutwey /img/forum/go_quote.gif community service............but not jail time. jails are for those who committed heinous crimes. pit bulls are born to fight. i mean, that is what they are suppose to do. they are certainly not the best option for having a pet. what they are suppose to do is regulate the ownership of pitbulls. |
Originally Posted by plainsong /img/forum/go_quote.gif And we learned something about you today. "Pit bulls" are as fine a pet as any breed. And as with any breed, if you start mucking around with the bloodline, you'll get some predispositions... however, don't abuse your pit bull and it will be as fine as any dog... of course, you have actual experience with the breed, right? Yeah, I didn't think so. I guess it doesn't take much smarts to get on the internet. |
Originally Posted by redshifter /img/forum/go_quote.gif Actually "Pit Bull" is not a breed, it is a description of a type or terrier. And according to my research this kind of terrier was bred specifically for dog fighting. Please see my link above for more information, and about the risks of rescuing these abused animals. |
Originally Posted by plainsong /img/forum/go_quote.gif Yes, that's why I put the name in quotations. Hey, if anyone wants to be afraid of an entire breed because it might attack you, ignoring the fact that a dog from any other breed might also attack you, then that's your thing. But a breed's origins do not tell much of anything about current breeding trends, nor does it tell about the individual dog. |
Even in dogs that are not recently bred from fighting lines, the urge to fight can arise at any time. Not to strongly emphasize this fact would be negligent. |
Originally Posted by redshifter /img/forum/go_quote.gif Actually "Pit Bull" is not a breed, it is a description of a type or terrier. And according to my research this kind of terrier was bred specifically for dog fighting. Please see my link above for more information, and about the risks of rescuing these abused animals. |
Originally Posted by redshifter /img/forum/go_quote.gif Emphasis mine. And this is from a Pit Bull rescue site. |
Originally Posted by EyeAmEye /img/forum/go_quote.gif It really doesn't matter what they were bred for or not, they make great pets, very loving, very gentle and very playful, if raised with love, just as any other dog. To make a blanket comment that they are bred for fighting so they aren't good pets, as lutwey stated, is ignorant. It's really amazing, reading some of the responses here, that non-human life is so belittled. To even suggest the greatest tragedy of this is how Vick is wasting his own talent is truly unbelievable. Vick is a worthless piece of garbage, and belongs in prison with the worst of them. |
Originally Posted by redshifter /img/forum/go_quote.gif Where did I say they did not make good pets? I have never had this kind of terrier as a pet. How would I know that? And it does matter what they are bred for. AGAIN: [size=large]"Even in dogs that are not recently bred from fighting lines, the urge to fight can arise at any time. Not to strongly emphasize this fact would be negligent."[/size] Here they are talking about the inbred urge to fight, not rescued dogs. Before you go calling someone "ignorant"--especially me--have your ducks in a row. |
Originally Posted by plainsong /img/forum/go_quote.gif I'm sorry Red, but in this case you don't seem to know much about dogs or dog breeding. The only thing you have touched on here is that you should know your dog's pedigree going back at least 4 generations, and that the dog should come from proven stock. That would be true of ANY breed you were looking to buy. Are we talking about pit bulls or staffies? Does it matter? Confirmation-wise, of course, but they're more related than not, and to rule out an entire breed based on a few bad breeders is just insane. FYI - Any rescue group for any breed will tell you their breed has special needs and only the right people are suitable for their wonderful breed. They rescue. That's what they do. |
Originally Posted by redshifter /img/forum/go_quote.gif Where did I say they did not make good pets? I have never had this kind of terrier as a pet. How would I know that? And it does matter what they are bred for. AGAIN: [size=large]"Even in dogs that are not recently bred from fighting lines, the urge to fight can arise at any time. Not to strongly emphasize this fact would be negligent."[/size] Here they are talking about the inbred urge to fight, not rescued dogs. Before you go calling someone "ignorant"--especially me--have your ducks in a row. |
Originally Posted by EyeAmEye /img/forum/go_quote.gif I wasn't calling you ignorant at all, the comment was aimed at Lutwey's original comment about them not making good pets (reading over my post I can see why you thought I was referring to you, sorry about that). The only comment I directed at you was stating that the alleged breeding of the animal doesn't mean they can't make good pets. Let me put it to you this way, no pit owner, breeder, or anyone else that has had prolonged exposure to a pit bull raised as a pet, shares the opinion about their alleged dangers. All the warnings and fear are from those who don't own one. Their opinion is completely invalid, because they base this on the portrayal of pit bulls by our glorious and always unbiased media, and the only crap coming from them is the negative, because they are being raised by gang morons and other violent idiots who raise them to be as viscious as their owner. |
Originally Posted by redshifter /img/forum/go_quote.gif Yes but not just any dog has been bred for fighting other dogs. Why would I check 4 generations of a poodle? Or a mastiff? What we are talking about is a genetic predisposition for aggression. What is so hard to understand about that? |
Originally Posted by plainsong /img/forum/go_quote.gif Umm, you want to check because you care about having a happy healthy dog? Seriously, no one should breed one dog to another dog if they haven't both either earned a show title, won a tracking/earth dog, etc., competition, or been certified by a judge as suitable for breeding. Please, don't perpetuate the need for poorly bred dogs. You won't get the best that breed has to offer, and for the dog it can result in less than stellar health. Only buy from breeders that can produce this kind of information and who care about actually bettering the breed. And yeah, you want to care especially about Mastiffs. Poorly bred Mastiffs can be a bit crazy, aggressive, nervous, and oh yeah, can have all the big dog ailments times 2. And besides the heartbreak of these big dogs with short life spans, Mastiffs are supposed to not be aggressive, or nervous...or crazy in the bad way. In fact, in the Finnish Dachshund Club, if you don't follow those rules your butt is kicked out and warnings put in local papers not to buy dogs from you. The doxy club isn't unique with these rules. |