er6i vs. e3

Sep 16, 2004 at 7:30 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 1

TenaciousO

1000+ Head-Fier
Joined
Apr 24, 2004
Posts
1,207
Likes
12
Location
Roselle, IL
I received the er6i today, and here are my thoughts about it compared to the e3:

er6i
  1. brighter, more sibilant
  2. more bite
  3. more fragile
  4. much more microphonic
  5. similar comfort

e3
  1. slightly rolled off highs; fuller and warmer sounding
  2. thicker cord, seems more durable
  3. similar bass
  4. similar isolation

Verdict: They have distinct tonal characteristics, but I would say these two earphones are very comparable and so I don't think you can go wrong with either purchase. Ultimately, it will depend on the sonic/build quality preferences of each individual listener as opposed to a discourse on which sounds better. The er6i is a brighter phone that can be sibilant at times (although lessened a bit by the foam tips) and has a bit of an edge. It's weaknesses are that it is a bit microphonic and seems more fragile than the e3. The e3s are more durable earphones (at least they feel like they are) so I think they'd be better for the active user, but they are more polite and lack the bite of the er6i. However, the e3s have a very pleasant, fuller sound. I think that the e3s would be easier on the ears for extended listening as the highs on the er6i could become fatiguing. I find the bass comparable. I would say that if you're a Grado fan, go with the er6i. If you're a Sennheiser fan, go with the e3.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top