Earbuds Round-Up
Nov 26, 2020 at 2:11 AM Post #50,627 of 75,145
I believe this is an overpriced version of the lower-priced Headroom MS16

rBVaVV1pOpmAWt1gAAFDRRAHEQA093.jpg
Just "run away" the next time you come across these shells. They kill the sound
see this post
shell.jpg
 
Nov 26, 2020 at 2:42 AM Post #50,629 of 75,145
Personally experimented with this, and it's true.
Looks can be deceiving. I couldn't believe it when I opened them. The design is a total failure
 
Nov 26, 2020 at 5:08 AM Post #50,630 of 75,145
Just "run away" the next time you come across these shells. They kill the sound
see this post
shell.jpg
haha, you don't see me running :) this is just one of my favourite earbuds, in fact, my top 10s..your image and your post had other earbuds and even the described image stating the MS16 is not showing the same shell shape at all, this is the case of mistaken identity,(wrong earbuds you're calling out)

Everyone I know who owns it has stellar comments on it :)
 
Nov 26, 2020 at 10:49 AM Post #50,631 of 75,145
I believe this is an overpriced version of the lower-priced Headroom MS16

rBVaVV1pOpmAWt1gAAFDRRAHEQA093.jpg
Haven't tried MS16, I don't think so though.

They have different specs.

MS16
Sensitivity:115±3dBdB
Resistance:16Ω

EO320
Sensitivity:107dBdB
Resistance:32Ω

MS16 is also reviewed to have good mids: "The mids are amazingly clear and crisp" . I hear completely opposite with EO320 whereas the mids sound like the weakest part of the spectrum.

Looks like they're using similar shells though. Not something uncommon with earbuds, there are few shell variations around generally.
 
Nov 26, 2020 at 4:15 PM Post #50,632 of 75,145
haha, you don't see me running :) this is just one of my favourite earbuds, in fact, my top 10s..your image and your post had other earbuds and even the described image stating the MS16 is not showing the same shell shape at all, this is the case of mistaken identity,(wrong earbuds you're calling out)

Everyone I know who owns it has stellar comments on it :)
I didn't talk about the driver, which is ok for budget-friendly earbuds, but about the shells. I tried a few high impedance DIY drivers, like 400ohm graphene and
600ohm beryllium and the sound is very congested.
 
Nov 27, 2020 at 5:13 AM Post #50,633 of 75,145
Can anyone compare TONEKING Dendroaspis Viridis and TO600?
 
Nov 27, 2020 at 5:48 AM Post #50,634 of 75,145
Just received the yincrow X6, its okay for its price, but for price to performance ratio I'd still consider the Koss line-up more bang for the buck.

Does the X6's need burn-in? so far liking the donut foams more than the full foams, more transparent overall though mid bass I think is more boomy, but better tonality than full foams, YMMV.
 
Nov 27, 2020 at 6:00 AM Post #50,635 of 75,145
Just received the yincrow X6, its okay for its price, but for price to performance ratio I'd still consider the Koss line-up more bang for the buck.

Does the X6's need burn-in? so far liking the donut foams more than the full foams, more transparent overall though mid bass I think is more boomy, but better tonality than full foams, YMMV.
It costs you nothing to try. Most of the earphones can benefit from a break-in process.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top