[Paul - iBasso]

DX240 660 Tool for using the .img firmware. This is what we use at our factory. With any of these, I try them myself but also print out the directions. For me at least, that is easiest.

660 Tool with instructions:

http://www.ibasso.com/uploadfiles/download/660playerupgradetools.zip

DX240 .img firmware:

http://www.ibasso.com/uploadfiles/download/DX240_20220117_1.02.267_64G_img.zip

.img firmware for the 660 Tool.
http://www.ibasso.com/uploadfiles/download/DX240_20221214_2.00.044_64G_img.zip


Local update firmware to download, open the download to find the firmware and instructions.

http://www.ibasso.com/uploadfiles/download/DX240FW-ota-v2.00.zip

FW: 2.01.070

.img firmware for the 660 Tool.
http://www.ibasso.com/uploadfiles/download/DX240_20230112_2.01.070_64G_img.zip

Local update firmware to download, open the download to find the firmware and instructions.
http://www.ibasso.com/uploadfiles/download/DX240FW-ota-v2.01.zip




AMP8MK2 is now out. 219 USD MSRP
Specifications

Specifications

4.4mm Headphone Out :

Maximum Output Level 6.2Vrms

Output Power£∫ 980mW@32ohm, 128mW@300ohm

Frequency Response 10Hz-45kHz (+/- 0.3dB)

S/N 125dB

Dynamic Range 125dB

THD+N£∫

-114dB (NO LOAD)

-113dB (@300ohm)

-101dB (@32ohm)

Crosstalk -122dB

Output Impedance: 0.55ohm



3.5mm Headphone Out:

Maximum Output Level 3.1Vrms

Output Power 281mW@32ohm, 32mW@300ohm

Frequency Response 10Hz-45kHz (+/- 0.3dB)

S/N 122dB

Dynamic Range 122dB

THD+N

-110dB (NO LOAD)

-109dB (@300ohm)

-98dB (@32ohm)

Crosstalk -117dB

Output Impedance: 0.32ohm

Average Play Time: 9.5 hours

(The play time varies with different

resolutions and headphone/IEM loads.)

AMP3MOD

 

[Aurora0001]

660 is the same chip as the 300max, right? Interested in seeing how it performs- should be a treat compared to the slower UI of 220.

 

[Silverlinings]

Curious to see the price..I’m guessing it will be more expensive by a decent amount than the DX160..I’m guessing in the $750-$800 range to sit in between the DX300 and the DX160..there’s a lot of competition in this price range now. It looks the same screen size as the DX160..We shall hopefully see soon

 

[monsieurfromag3]

Coming soon.

Oh hello my next DAP

 

[Infoseeker]

Nice, 9038pro the better ess chip. Not the silly 9068as

 

[monsieurfromag3]

Nice, 9038pro the better ess chip. Not the silly 9068as

I heard the 9068 in the Kann Alpha and it was nothing special. That 9038Pro though, that is juicy. I am happy iBasso stuck with the desktop DACs for the 200 series.
Also, as the 220 was one of the first 8.1 Android players I hope the 240 will uphold that tradition and operate on 9 or 10 - or 11! (one can dream)

 

[feverfive]

I don't stream, so have no need/want for Android, but I'm still interested. Battery life will be very important to me. I go in just presuming this will be a nice-sounding device, so I'll consider a bunch of ancillary variables most consciously.

 

[artpiggo]

Price plz

 

[lantian]

Thank you Paul, super fantastic news.

 

[Auricon]

Nice! Now seriously contemplating parting the M11+ LTD for the DX240, which would make for an excellent iBasso Trio collection - DX240, DX300, DX300MAX

 

[lantian]

Curious to see the price..I’m guessing it will be more expensive by a decent amount than the DX160..I’m guessing in the $750-$800 range to sit in between the DX300 and the DX160..there’s a lot of competition in this price range now. It looks the same screen size as the DX160..We shall hopefully see soon

Pretty sure it's gona be in the 900usd till 1200usd price range. It's an upgrade to the dx220 and with more expensive and harder to implement dac chip and all the new fpga and CPU pretty sure best ibasso can do pricewise is match what dx220 went for, more likely what the dx200 went for.

 

[fabio19]

Another dac Sabre......

 

[monsieurfromag3]

Pretty sure it's gona be in the 900isd till 1200isd price range. It's an upgrade to the dx220 and with more expensive and harder to implement dac chip and all the new fpga and CPU pretty sure best ibasso can do pricewise is match what dx220 went for, more likely what the dx200 went for.

$1200 seems like too much since that’s the DX300’s price point. Realistically the odds are poor that it will retail for less than $1000, but I’d love for it to settle right between the 160 and 300 at around $800. Or. $1000 bundled with an additional amp module.

 

[lantian]

$1200 seems like too much since that’s the DX300’s price point. Realistically the odds are poor that it will retail for less than $1000, but I’d love for it to settle right between the 160 and 300 at around $800. Or. $1000 bundled with an additional amp module.

Would love for it to be that way as well.

 

[eloelo]

Interesting. I wonder how it does as a desktop dac/amp too. My DX160 pops at random times when used as dac/amp