1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.

    Dismiss Notice

DX200=Affordable High End Audio. Dual ES9028Pro dacs. AMP1, AMP3, AMP5, AMP7 & AMP8 ***Firmware support now up for AMP9***

Discussion in 'Portable Source Gear' started by paul - ibasso, Dec 17, 2015.
First
 
Back
481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490
492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501
Next
 
Last
  1. artpiggo
    Do you try version 2.5 yet? from my listening, 2.5 is quite near 2.3 especially on transparency.
     
  2. artpiggo
  3. Bastianpp
    Yes, i listen the 2.4 and 2.5 firmware.
    I like more the 2.3, sound is a little more coherent to me with my shure se846 and t5p 2nd.
     
  4. AnakChan Moderator
    I liked the 2.3 sound (which to me was like a revelation for the DX200) and I liked the 2.4 too but I wonder if I'm the only person liking the 2.4!? Not tried 2.5 and if it does have the 2.3 sound, no complaints from me either. Just feeling lonely to be the only 2.4 fan.
     
  5. donjigantes
    I just listened to 2.5, it's less neutral than 2.3, but otherwise about the same.
     
    Last edited: Aug 2, 2017
  6. donjigantes
    2.4 seems to amplify the song too much, with only vocals sounding good.
     
  7. artpiggo
    You are not the only one. I also did mention when 2.4 came out. I share same thought with you.
     
  8. kel77
    AMP3 specs
    2.5mm Phone Out:
    Max Output: 6Vrms
    Frequency Response:10-45KHz -0.5dB
    SN: 124dB
    THD+N: 0.00025%, -112dB (32 Ohms@2.4Vrms)
    DNR: 124dB
    Crosstalk: -123dB

    2.5mm Line Out:
    Max Output: 6Vrms
    Frequency Response:10-45KHz -0.5dB
    SN: 124dB
    THD+N: < 0.00022%, -113dB
    Crosstalk: -114dB

    Playtime: 7.5 hrs
     
    fuhransahis likes this.
  9. tkteo
    Looking forward to the changelog for v2.5 firmware.
     
  10. alota
    From my memory, i tried my iem in mojo, hugo(same output power of mojo) and dx200 amp 1. For me are similar, no big difference to drive my iem. Of course different sound signature
     
  11. artpiggo
    [​IMG]
     
    chaiyuta and fuhransahis like this.
  12. AugustineNg
    So attractive! Cant wait to try it in HK!
     
  13. mrmoto050
    Ilike 2.4, listened to all day yesterday has huge soundstage to me. I have not had any issues with my DX200 at all, fantastic sound. oh, using AMP2.
     
  14. Paul - iBasso
    Peak to peak is 8 volts.
     
    iBasso Stay updated on iBasso at their sponsor page on Head-Fi.
     
    http://www.ibasso.com/
  15. javahut
    Yeah... 2.5 fw Mango sounds great. But when you select Artist/Album, and Play the Album, the TRACKS STILL PLAY IN THE WRONG/RANDOM ORDER. How many times do we have to complain about this basic function before it gets fixed? Then we hear it's been submitted to the team... new fw comes out... and tracks still don't play in tagged track number order. All other players I've used at least manage to play tracks in the correct order. Ibasso can build an entire near reference quality audio player, but can't get the tracks to play in the correct order? Makes you wonder what else is "not quite right". Possibly the reason for the difference in sound characteristic between the fw builds, and between Mango OS and Android Mango.

    I will say sound quality in Mango OS is the best it's been so far. Hopefully it'll still be this good when we get a fw version that plays Albums' tracks in correct order.

    So how long do we have to wait again this time for a fw update to get Albums to play in tagged track order?
     
    truenobzr likes this.
First
 
Back
481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490
492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501
Next
 
Last

Share This Page