DX200=Affordable High End Audio. Dual ES9028Pro dacs. AMP1, AMP3, AMP5, AMP7 & AMP8 ***Firmware support now up for AMP9***
post-13323340
Post #5,011 of 21,843

twister6

twister6 Reviews
Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Oct 6, 2013
Messages
11,652
Reaction score
28,768
Joined
Oct 6, 2013
Posts
11,652
Likes
28,768
Website
twister6.com
 
  When folks are burning in the DX200 and not listening, are you using your earphones or the burn in dongle? I've got probably say 240 hrs burn in of which most of that is with the burn in dongle. I'm hearing somewhat grittiness in the trebles compared to the WM1Z with the 1Plus2.2. So I'm wondering if I've wasted the past 1.5 weeks burning in using the dongle and have to restart with an earphone?

I don't think you have wasted time but I like to use headphones also. Because of the varying impedance of monitors I think it burns a system in differently. I have no edge or grittiness compared to the 1Z or Hugo, just nice and clean. I would try a headphone for a while also. 
 
It could be also the effect of 1Z smoother more musical sound sig versus more revealing reference sig of DX200.
 
Sometimes we focus so much on the sound of headphones, that we forget about the source having its own contributing factor (not just synergy but the actual sound sig of the source).  A few people already mentioned to me they are not crazy about dx200, and after a further chat they disclosed about wanting more impact and weight in the low end, on top of the L-shaped (or V-shaped) sig of their headphones.  I guess DX200 is not for bassheads, but rather for purist
  I find DX200 to be a true Reference quality DAP, even more than LPG where mid-bass has a little more slam in comparison to DX200.  I mean, when we describe a sound as being warmer or brighter, in my opinion it's just a relative comparison to something else we use as a reference.  Based on everything I have tested and reviewed so far, DX200 became that "reference" to my ears.
 
     Share This Post       
post-13323393
Post #5,012 of 21,843

artpiggo

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Nov 18, 2015
Messages
3,267
Reaction score
1,575
Location
Bangkok, Thailand
Joined
Nov 18, 2015
Location
Bangkok, Thailand
Posts
3,267
Likes
1,575
It could be also the effect of 1Z smoother more musical sound sig versus more revealing reference sig of DX200.

Sometimes we focus so much on the sound of headphones, that we forget about the source having its own contributing factor (not just synergy but the actual sound sig of the source).  A few people already mentioned to me they are not crazy about dx200, and after a further chat they disclosed about wanting more impact and weight in the low end, on top of the L-shaped (or V-shaped) sig of their headphones.  I guess DX200 is not for bassheads, but rather for purist :D   I find DX200 to be a true Reference quality DAP, even more than LPG where mid-bass has a little more slam in comparison to DX200.  I mean, when we describe a sound as being warmer or brighter, in my opinion it's just a relative comparison to something else we use as a reference.  Based on everything I have tested and reviewed so far, DX200 became that "reference" to my ears.

It is ibasso marketing strat. I am pretty sure they already prepared amp module to increase low end body. :cool:
 
     Share This Post       
post-13323557
Post #5,013 of 21,843

twister6

twister6 Reviews
Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Oct 6, 2013
Messages
11,652
Reaction score
28,768
Joined
Oct 6, 2013
Posts
11,652
Likes
28,768
Website
twister6.com
 
It could be also the effect of 1Z smoother more musical sound sig versus more revealing reference sig of DX200.

Sometimes we focus so much on the sound of headphones, that we forget about the source having its own contributing factor (not just synergy but the actual sound sig of the source).  A few people already mentioned to me they are not crazy about dx200, and after a further chat they disclosed about wanting more impact and weight in the low end, on top of the L-shaped (or V-shaped) sig of their headphones.  I guess DX200 is not for bassheads, but rather for purist
  I find DX200 to be a true Reference quality DAP, even more than LPG where mid-bass has a little more slam in comparison to DX200.  I mean, when we describe a sound as being warmer or brighter, in my opinion it's just a relative comparison to something else we use as a reference.  Based on everything I have tested and reviewed so far, DX200 became that "reference" to my ears.

It is ibasso marketing strat. I am pretty sure they already prepared amp module to increase low end body.
 
My wishful thinking, they gotta be working on a lower power amp module for IEMs (and efficient headphones) to boost battery life, hoping it still has both SE and BAL outputs.
 
     Share This Post       
post-13323594
Post #5,014 of 21,843

javahut

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Oct 29, 2003
Messages
378
Reaction score
101
Joined
Oct 29, 2003
Posts
378
Likes
101
alright... I just ordered. this thing. better be improvement over my Note2 -> rsa predator dac/amp... or I'm blaming you guys. ;-D

not feeling as confident about it, though, after twister6's post above about some people wanting more impact and weight in the low end.
 
     Share This Post       
post-13323619
Post #5,015 of 21,843

Mimouille

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Nov 3, 2010
Messages
11,780
Reaction score
8,319
Location
Beijing
Joined
Nov 3, 2010
Location
Beijing
Posts
11,780
Likes
8,319
alright... I just ordered. this thing. better be improvement over my Note2 -> rsa predator dac/amp... or I'm blaming you guys. ;-D

not feeling as confident about it, though, after twister6's post above about some people wanting more impact and weight in the low end.
It will sound the same as your existing rig, all sources sound the same. All iems and headphones as well. It's all an illusion.
 
     Share This Post       
post-13323632
Post #5,016 of 21,843

wirefriend

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Jan 10, 2014
Messages
403
Reaction score
83
Joined
Jan 10, 2014
Posts
403
Likes
83
alright... I just ordered. this thing. better be improvement over my Note2 -> rsa predator dac/amp... or I'm blaming you guys. ;-D

not feeling as confident about it, though, after twister6's post above about some people wanting more impact and weight in the low end.
 
The impact and weight in the low end is there as long as it is in the recording.
Many DAPs add weight. DX200 does not, which doesn't mean it is not capable of reproducing it if it IS there.
 
     Share This Post       
  • Like
Reactions: Pasopati
post-13323658
Post #5,017 of 21,843

javahut

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Oct 29, 2003
Messages
378
Reaction score
101
Joined
Oct 29, 2003
Posts
378
Likes
101
The impact and weight in the low end is there as long as it is in the recording.
Many DAPs add weight. DX200 does not, which doesn't mean it is not capable of reproducing it if it IS there.
okay... that's making me feel better about it again. :-D
 
     Share This Post       
post-13323670
Post #5,018 of 21,843

csglinux

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jun 4, 2014
Messages
3,478
Reaction score
2,535
Joined
Jun 4, 2014
Posts
3,478
Likes
2,535
It's all an illusion.
 
:)
 
I was recently making some comparisons between X5iii, QP1R and DX200 with my good buddy, @moedawg140. I won't speak for him, but to my ears, the QP1R definitely has more authority and bass slam (most noticeable on the Fostex TH-X00) without losing detail up top. I'm not dismissing the possibility that the DX200 is correct and the QP1R is artificially v-shaped. If it's all an illusion, I wish I could get that same illusion on the DX200 :wink: Even after toying with the EQ, I prefer the low-end punch of the QP1R.
 
P.S. On the flip side, the DX200 has a cleaner noise floor with sensitive IEMs.
 
     Share This Post       
post-13323711
Post #5,020 of 21,843

twister6

twister6 Reviews
Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Oct 6, 2013
Messages
11,652
Reaction score
28,768
Joined
Oct 6, 2013
Posts
11,652
Likes
28,768
Website
twister6.com
alright... I just ordered. this thing. better be improvement over my Note2 -> rsa predator dac/amp... or I'm blaming you guys. ;-D

not feeling as confident about it, though, after twister6's post above about some people wanting more impact and weight in the low end.
 
What I was referring to is that some people want enhanced low end impact/weight straight out of the box, and in my opinion the default AMP1 offers a very accurate, transparent, and articulate low end reproduction, but it's not boosted/enhanced.  If the original recording has bass - you will hear it in its all glory down to every nuance, nothing is reduced or rolled off.  The idea behind a source is to be neutral in order to accurately reproduce the music.  Then, you pick'n'choose headphones that suite your sound signature preference.  If you want more fine-tuning, use EQ (preferably Parametric EQ where you have control of bandwidth (Q) of every band for a more precise tuning - iBasso already mentioned it's on their to-do list, in addition to already included typical paragraphic EQ).  Or get an external Amp to drive it from DX200 Line Out, or use an external DAC/amp to drive from DX200 spdif digital output.  You have a lot of different options, starting with a default reference AMP1 module to using any external amp or dac/amp to color and to boost your sound, as well as more upcoming options for additional AMP modules.  It's all about flexibility which you get plenty in this case.
 
     Share This Post       
post-13323782
Post #5,021 of 21,843

vladzakhar

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Jan 25, 2012
Messages
813
Reaction score
140
Joined
Jan 25, 2012
Posts
813
Likes
140
Interesting observation: the battery life improves greatly then I use my totally wireless earbuds. I didn't drain the battery all of way down yet, but for 6 hours continually using it the battery meter went down 20% only. With wired earphones it's draining the battery down much faster.
 
     Share This Post       
post-13323799
Post #5,022 of 21,843

wirefriend

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Jan 10, 2014
Messages
403
Reaction score
83
Joined
Jan 10, 2014
Posts
403
Likes
83
  Interesting observation: the battery life improves greatly then I use my totally wireless earbuds. I didn't drain the battery all of way down yet, but for 6 hours continually using it the battery meter went down 20% only. With wired earphones it's draining the battery down much faster.
 
In theory it makes sense - you're not pushing a lot of current throught the wires but you're generating some air waves instead.
Perhaps the whole AMP section is off in this setup?
 
     Share This Post       
post-13323815
Post #5,023 of 21,843

twister6

twister6 Reviews
Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Oct 6, 2013
Messages
11,652
Reaction score
28,768
Joined
Oct 6, 2013
Posts
11,652
Likes
28,768
Website
twister6.com
 
  Interesting observation: the battery life improves greatly then I use my totally wireless earbuds. I didn't drain the battery all of way down yet, but for 6 hours continually using it the battery meter went down 20% only. With wired earphones it's draining the battery down much faster.
 
In theory it makes sense - you're not pushing a lot of current throught the wires but you're generating some air waves instead.
Perhaps the whole AMP section is off in this setup?
 
Exactly!  Wireless exercises your digital encoding and BT antenna; you are not drawing as much current from your amp (gotta be significantly less since headphone output is not connected).
 
     Share This Post       
post-13323829
Post #5,024 of 21,843

LCMusicLover

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jan 25, 2012
Messages
2,132
Reaction score
1,355
Location
Oregon Coast
Joined
Jan 25, 2012
Location
Oregon Coast
Posts
2,132
Likes
1,355
   
... Perhaps the whole AMP section is off in this setup?
 
I don't believe this is evidence of the AMP section being off.  
 
As merely anecdotal evidence, I know that the battery on my iPod Touch lasted much longer (>1.5X) when I was listening via a Bluetooth speaker vs. via wired headphones.
 
I suspect that well-done bluetooth uses much less juice than pushing current through wires.
 
     Share This Post       
post-13323859
Post #5,025 of 21,843

HiFiChris

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Feb 9, 2015
Messages
4,678
Reaction score
10,691
Location
Joined
Feb 9, 2015
Location
Posts
4,678
Likes
10,691
Of course the Amp section will be inactive when streaming something to a wireless speaker/headphone using Bluetooth or WiFi because only the wireless chip in the player is used for this. The DAC and Amp section are not needed for this at all.
 
     Share This Post       
  • Like
Reactions: Pasopati

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 4)

Top