DVD Audio now more popular than SACD
Apr 27, 2004 at 11:18 AM Post #2 of 35

acs236

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
May 24, 2002
Posts
3,335
Likes
39
It seems to me that more often now, DVD-A is included as a feature with even buget players, e.g. Toshiba 4900, more often than SACD is included -- am I right about this?

If so, it might explain why people are buying more DVD-A players -- just icing on the cake, and it may be why DVD-A media sales are up.
 
Apr 27, 2004 at 12:00 PM Post #4 of 35

tortie

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Aug 12, 2003
Posts
2,812
Likes
14
Quote:

Originally Posted by gort
I read on sa-cd.net that above survey left out hybrid SACDs.


Which I think should be the case. As most of the hybrid sales usually are bought by redbook-only player owners, not SACD owners.
 
Apr 27, 2004 at 12:12 PM Post #5 of 35

jpelg

Needs a regular fix of 'Fi
'06 Nat Meet Co-Coordinator
Joined
Jan 19, 2002
Posts
8,675
Likes
26
Location
The Elm City
Quote:

Which I think should be the case. As most of the hybrid sales usually are bought by redbook-only player owners, not SACD owners.


Why would you think that? I purchase only hybrid (dual-layer) SACD's. I avoid single-layer SACD's unless I already own the redbook version too.

On one hand it is a hedge-betting strategy, but it also allows me to play the CD in a non-SACD player (car, portable, etc.) if I wish.
 
Apr 27, 2004 at 12:32 PM Post #6 of 35

tortie

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Aug 12, 2003
Posts
2,812
Likes
14
Quote:

Originally Posted by jpelg
Why would you think that? I purchase only hybrid (dual-layer) SACD's. I avoid single-layer SACD's unless I already own the redbook version too.

On one hand it is a hedge-betting strategy, but it also allows me to play the CD in a non-SACD player (car, portable, etc.) if I wish.



Me too. If I had an option to buy a hybrid over a single-layer SACD, I would choose the hybrid 10 times out of 10.

But what im saying is that most hybrid sales are bought by non SACD owners. They get hybrids for a few extra bucks even if the dont have a player now thinking that they will be able to play them if they get an SACD player later. I think there was a thread about it last time, but the search is dead right now.
 
Apr 27, 2004 at 12:49 PM Post #7 of 35

Harty

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Aug 2, 2003
Posts
267
Likes
24
the last four SACD's that I bought have been Hybrid, I prefer Hybrid just in case SACD goes belly up, which I don't think it will, but it's better to be safe than sorry.

My first three SACD's that I ever bought a couple of years back are SACD single layer, but I've got CD versions of them too.

Best wishes,

Paul.
 
Apr 27, 2004 at 1:02 PM Post #8 of 35

jpelg

Needs a regular fix of 'Fi
'06 Nat Meet Co-Coordinator
Joined
Jan 19, 2002
Posts
8,675
Likes
26
Location
The Elm City
Quote:

But what im saying is that most hybrid sales are bought by non SACD owners. They get hybrids for a few extra bucks even if the dont have a player now thinking that they will be able to play them if they get an SACD player later.


I don't know anyone personally (present company here at Head-Fi excepted) that would spend the premium on a hybrid SACD over a much less expensive redbook version if they didn't already have an SACD player. I don't pretend to speak for all the masses, but if I didn't own an SACD player, even I probably wouldn't either.

I think your assumption would only be valid if there were not extra premium cost on the SACD, or there was only one (hybird) version of the CD available at all.
 
Apr 27, 2004 at 1:09 PM Post #9 of 35

tortie

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Aug 12, 2003
Posts
2,812
Likes
14
Quote:

Originally Posted by jpelg
I don't know anyone personally (present company here at Head-Fi excepted) that would spend the premium on a hybrid SACD over a much less expensive redbook version if they didn't already have an SACD player. I don't pretend to speak for all the masses, but if I didn't own an SACD player, even I probably wouldn't either.

I think your assumption would only be valid if there were not extra premium cost on the SACD, or there was only one (hybird) version of the CD available at all.



Yup your right. But some very popular hybrids like Pink Floyds and Norah Jone's cost the same compared to its CD counter part (im speaking of Amazon prices here). Which makes it automatic for everyone to get the hybrids over the normal CD.
 
Apr 27, 2004 at 1:09 PM Post #10 of 35

markl

Hangin' with the monkeys.
Member of the Trade: Lawton Audio
Joined
Jun 22, 2001
Posts
9,130
Likes
44
This survey was merely asking people how many SACDs they had bought and how many DVD-As they had bought. It did not count actual retail sales at the POS, and it left out hybrid SACDs. Here's a huge thread discussing the controversy: http://www.stevehoffman.tv/forums/sh...ad.php?t=32466

Suffice to say, not many people believe that the results of the survey reflect anything other than the DVD-A council's wet dreams.
orphsmile.gif
 
Apr 27, 2004 at 1:18 PM Post #11 of 35

tortie

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Aug 12, 2003
Posts
2,812
Likes
14
Quote:

Originally Posted by markl
This survey was merely asking people how many SACDs they had bought and how many DVD-As they had bought. It did not count actual retail sales at the POS, and it left out hybrid SACDs. Here's a huge thread discussing the controversy: http://www.stevehoffman.tv/forums/sh...ad.php?t=32466

Suffice to say, not many people believe that the results of the survey reflect anything other than the DVD-A council's wet dreams.
orphsmile.gif



Well that is good news for me since my player plays only SACDs
biggrin.gif
 
Apr 27, 2004 at 8:34 PM Post #13 of 35

Born2bwire

25+ Member ;-)
Joined
Nov 11, 2001
Posts
3,700
Likes
13
Quote:

Originally Posted by tortie
Which I think should be the case. As most of the hybrid sales usually are bought by redbook-only player owners, not SACD owners.


The problem is that more and more manufacturers are going to hybrid so you need to include these to get an accurate picture of sales. Because you can get a hybrid disc at comparitive costs to a regular CD shows that SACD is penetrating the market better despite whether or not they're being actually used in a SACD player.
 
Apr 27, 2004 at 10:16 PM Post #14 of 35

Chinchy

1000+ Head-Fier
Joined
Apr 16, 2003
Posts
1,111
Likes
10
I'd buy more SACD's, but the problem is that when I go to the stores, their selection of SACD's are quite paltry. They often only have one small section (as in one side of one display bookshelf). DVD-A is usually present in a wider selection..
 
Apr 27, 2004 at 10:38 PM Post #15 of 35

gloco

Only one ban in 5000 attempts!
Joined
Oct 19, 2001
Posts
7,047
Likes
20
At those % posted above...who cares? It appears these new formats are dead in the water and consumers wont be jumping onto dvd-a and/or sacd anytime soon.

and yeah, the sacd selection stinks, imho.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top