Redcarmoose
Headphoneus Supremus
I don’t hear the bass as defined, maybe it was the UA3? I’ll switch back to my DAPs to see if more power cleans it up? I use the Walkman 1A/1Z and UA3 Dongle.There is just something about planar bass that makes me love all things planar. Yes, it is different, and a (good) DD can give a more visceral bass (naturally), but planar has caught up to the DD in this regard, mostly (and with some hard work in the implementation). The Hook-X for instance has a very hard hitting and very deep bass to it (but remains quick and textured as well). It does still have that planar tonality to it, but almost hits like a DD, but with the added texture and speed from planar.
I concur on this, except where fuzzy is concerned (I simply don't hear it). What are the specs (driving power) of your source, if you don't mind me asking? I DO hear that when playing it from my phone, but they scale (tighten up) as you progress through the power addition of more powerful amps (and more current).
It might be very interesting to have BA bass mixed with ortho bass (if this is how they will do it). They are both fast and textured, but both have a timbre to them that exposes them as being different than DD (in a good way IMO). OR... if it is a crossover that changes from BA to PL then you would (potentially) have two sets of IEM in one (also very interesting). Either way, as long as these have a good tuning, they could be very innovative and unique.
A good planar implementation shouldn't sound smooth (per se') over the range; not that they can't though. Their speed and (short) decay time limit how smooth it can be. If it does, the planar driver isn't being utilized properly IMO (or they have done some other sort of trickery to make this happen). You should be able to almost feel the separation because of the nature of the way a planar works. That isn't to say that it can't happen, but it goes against the design of the driver itself (much like having super separation in a DD, it just doesn't do it naturally, but CAN be made to do it).
Having said that, you are right about coherency issues. I have a set of iBasso IT-07 (which is 1 DD and 6 BA). The DD provides some very juicy bass and sounds very good, but there is some speed issues between the DD and the BAs (being faster). They really aren't too noticeable unless you actually listen for it, and these are still one of my favorites, but it IS there. This might be the reason to pair PL and BA. they seem to share speed and transient response, though tonality will be a bit different (which is the interesting part to me).
I have a set of all BA in the Audiosense T800, and while most people might have missed it, they are a total crossover(less) design. This HAD to be very difficult to implement (at best), but they work seamlessly. I guess it will come down to how hard DUNU is willing to work to get it right because I think it CAN be done and done very well IMO. I am pretty excited to hear about these in all honesty.
Edit:
I just listened to the HOOK-X again using the WM1A, probably my issue has been from prolonged use of 10 DDmm/Hybrids over the last couple weeks. The difference is now yes, in has more definition, but still it’s effective but not as localized as DD, more spread out, and not really as defined in fast passages. Though when on it’s own it’s clear. Probably I need more time to acclimate to planar bass, as it’s so very different in character from all my other IEMs?
While the HOOK-X is the best planar I’ve heard, still it’s so very different than normally what I listen to. Where placement and positioning is so wild, different but cool. Like super-wide spread-out speakers in a room, with the bass kind-off promoted as a less dominate yet there, maybe slightly less physical than DD?
But you don’t hear the slight fuzzy-ness in different areas, where really it’s the midrange that has the most, I guess it’s the piezoelectric? But I do remember back in April when I was reviewing the HOOK-X that it took a while to become under its spell. And I wasn’t the only one, where the more time you spent listening, the more correct it started to seem? It’s airy really! But maybe with more time, the slightly thin airiness goes away, and everything becomes more substantial?
Last edited: