riverlethe
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2007
- Posts
- 484
- Likes
- 50
Does this tone down at all after a "break-in" period?
Originally Posted by b0dhi /img/forum/go_quote.gif Try a different amp. |
Originally Posted by DoomzDayz /img/forum/go_quote.gif what's your source? |
Originally Posted by riverlethe /img/forum/go_quote.gif If an amp changes the frequency response, there's something wrong with it IMO. |
Originally Posted by sbulack /img/forum/go_quote.gif With the ER4S (another phone which brings out sibilance that is present in the recording), I've always been able to bring the sibilance down to enjoyably listenable levels with a "tweak" to the audio path. A few tweaks that have worked well for me are: vibration damping the source and amp, contact enhancement for the analog audio IC (from just unplugging and replugging it several times to Caig DeOxit/ProGold to clean and condition the conductive surfaces to a silver contact enhancer like Mapleshade SilClear) and varying the power path (power cable, power filtering, - and for portable rigs switching from wall wart to batteries as the power source). Vibration damping is a relatively inexpensive tweak to try (my favorite damper in this application is sorbothane). Contact enhancement of the analog audio IC connectors is likewise a low-cost experiment to try. Power path changes for non-portable rigs are higher-priced, so they are only worth it if you know that you basically love the sound of the audio path and that it is worth it to you to invest in this kind of improvement. Sibilance at distracting listening levels (even with recordings containing it and phones which bring it out) can be brought down to a level where those recordings can be enjoyed without that distraction. Since it involves the investment of some work and money, it is only worth doing if the recordings and the audio path are worth it to you. Otherwise, you could just not listen to those recordings or get other phones with a smoother high end. |