Dr. Studio vs Solo Hd?
Aug 18, 2010 at 2:06 PM Post #18 of 73

winma

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Apr 6, 2010
Posts
863
Likes
17


Quote:
Just let this guy find out the hard way.
If he's smart enough, maybe he'll regret his purchase and get a better headphone instead. If not, we can't help him.
His ignorance is his bliss.


True...
very_evil_smiley.gif

 
None of them are good, i rather get something else. 
 
Aug 20, 2010 at 1:27 PM Post #19 of 73

AhokZYashA

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Jun 27, 2010
Posts
231
Likes
11
i tried the solo, and the studio once.
and didnt like the sound at all..
 
i preffered the M50 for this
 
Aug 20, 2010 at 1:57 PM Post #20 of 73

H22

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Jan 29, 2009
Posts
328
Likes
17
I thought the standard solo's sounded pretty good (ok, a lot  better than i was expecting, i was actually very impressed) through my sonyX>mini3 amp, unamped they kinda went flat and the low end was less controlled. I was also able to listen to a pair of the soloHDs', but they were in a display with a sony MP3 player, and there was a headphone splitter pluged into it, one side fed the soloHDs', and the other side was feeding a det of their IEMs. This set up sounded absolutelly horrible, i don't know what settings were on the sony, and i have a feeling having two pair of phones plugged in didn't help. the bass was muddy, boomy and overpowered everything to the point i took them off after about 30 sec, *blech*. After that i could understand why some absolutelly detest them. But i really want to go back with my set up and re-try the HD's.
 
 
LOTS of head-fi'ers HATE them with a vengance, personally i think its a bit missplaced. I think most here think they are overpriced (and they are for most folks here (IMO)). Most here look as SQ vs price above all else, so style, hippness, and a rap star endorsement are all negative factors.
 
I think they are getting a bum rap.. If you like them, buy them. I was very close to walking out with a pair after i tried the SOLO's. The HDs' apear to have cured the week headband issue.
 
I however, decided to reserch it a bit, and I held off buying a pair based mainly on all the poor reviews on this forum. Even though i feel the solo's are no where near as bad as they are claimed to be, I settled on a set of M50s' ( they are in the mail as i type this!) .
 
%95 of the posts i read claim the M50's sound VERY good (any Dr. Dre are polar oposites on this forum), and are a bargain at ~$100.00, they offer good bass and great overall sound quality. I figure it was a safe bet. When they arive though, I plan on giving them a good A/B comparison with the SOLOs'.
 
The sony XB's are roundly aplauded by bass heads here as well.
 
Aug 21, 2010 at 5:13 PM Post #21 of 73

Paste

Head-Fier
Joined
Jul 8, 2010
Posts
69
Likes
16
I had a bad experience with the Solos. 
frown.gif

 
I saw them and tried to put them on for a laugh, I accidentally broke them as I stretched them to place them on my head. Something tells me they're going to get stolen if you wear those in public anyway. 
 
Aug 21, 2010 at 5:31 PM Post #22 of 73

cowjuan

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Jul 29, 2010
Posts
212
Likes
15
i borrowed the studios from my brother for about a week. they were okay headphones, mainly for listening to rap. however, i tried the solos at the apple store and was impressed by the thumpy bass response. it sounded real good. i would go for the solos. the studios require batteries and the sound quality isn't that good.
 
Aug 21, 2010 at 6:36 PM Post #23 of 73

Soaa-

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Mar 23, 2010
Posts
418
Likes
44
I don't know if this will change your opinion on anything, but I personally think the Beats all look ugly.
 
There, I said it.
 
Aug 21, 2010 at 7:13 PM Post #24 of 73

casioa5302ca

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Jun 6, 2010
Posts
403
Likes
16

take them both and than......maybe

 

 

e.g.:

(ATH FC700AWH, $53.99 somewhere)
 
just my cents, nothing more and-
 
still, I am wondering...why even (especially youg guys) are so excited about this BIG bubble of advertisement.
If they wanna to impressed some girls, why they don´t save their money for necessary drinks for girls by buying of some CRUEL Skullcandy´s ?
popcorn.gif

 
 
Aug 21, 2010 at 9:39 PM Post #26 of 73

Soaa-

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Mar 23, 2010
Posts
418
Likes
44
Quote:
Well sorry if I want to help AIDS in Africa I guess I am a bad person.


You and I both know that there are better ways to fund AIDS research, but that's beside the point now, as it's just been confirmed that
 
you are a troll.
 
Aug 21, 2010 at 9:49 PM Post #27 of 73

zero7525

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Jun 11, 2010
Posts
442
Likes
16


Quote:
Well sorry if I want to help AIDS in Africa I guess I am a bad person.


If you want to help people with diseases in developing nations, you donate to a charity aid society, not to spend a ridiculous amount of money on Dr. dre's headphones. BTW, the royalties from the profits acquired for Dr. Dre will be much greater than whatever single digit percent they are donating to africa anyways. Case in point, you are just making yourself feel better with that marketing gimmick, and enjoying your crap headphones while people are dying in africa.
 
Aug 21, 2010 at 10:02 PM Post #28 of 73

stevenswall

1000+ Head-Fier
Joined
Jun 15, 2009
Posts
1,058
Likes
50


For Everyones Information

 
Consumer Reports rates the Beats Solo LOWER than the fake white myphonies that the iPlod comes with! Listening to the Solo HD, it isn't really an improvement... just another product push. Now compare the $40 price tag to the $150 one on the Monsters...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top