does DAC really make alot of difference?
Feb 6, 2012 at 8:19 PM Post #34 of 84
Borizm - the fact that you talk about "burn in" like it's a real thing makes me doubt your claims of authority.
 
Feb 6, 2012 at 8:40 PM Post #35 of 84
 
...your Xonar essence should sound transparent and you have nothing to gain from upgrading it.
 

 
I have to disagree. But the OP will have to demo an external unit himself in order to determine whether there would be any justifiable gains in his setup, or not.

The M-DAC has similar noise level to what Stereophile measured for the Xonar STX (in fact, the RCA output is more comparable to the cheap Xonar D1). Then again, the actual performance of the card may vary due to PCs with very noisy components, problems related to the power supply or motherboard, ground loops (especially with an external AC powered amplifier), or incorrect usage. Of course, if the differences are not measured, or proven with blind tests, they may not even exist.
 


A cryo treated AX850 is pulling power though a Shunyata Venom 3 power cord from a dedicated 20A circuit terminated with a Shunyata SR-Z1 receptacle. Box is also watercooled with both the pump and radiator outside of the case. The ASUS Crosshair IV Extreme board and Xonar ST soundcard I am using has also been cryo treated. I would consider the entire setup a lower-noise-than-average PC build. The introduction of an external DAC clearly lowered the noise floor even further. Again, the OP will have to demo an external unit himself in order to determine whether there would be any justifiable gains in his setup, or not.
 
 
Feb 6, 2012 at 8:45 PM Post #36 of 84


Quote:
The Dac does make a difference but it is usually small enough that you would never pick up on with normal computer speakers as they aren't revealing enough. What you pay for with better DAC's is for the very subtle things that usually take very revealing equipment to bring out. That said I like the sound that I get from properly setup Burr brown DAC's over say the Cirrus Logic DAC's. Better dynamics & less conjestion in the sound. More open soundstage. These are all things that normal computer speaker lack the ability to expose. I use modified biamped studio monitors that are extremely revealing.



+1
 
Feb 7, 2012 at 3:25 AM Post #37 of 84
Quote:
Originally Posted by adamlau /img/forum/go_quote.gif
 
I would consider the entire setup a lower-noise-than-average PC build. The introduction of an external DAC clearly lowered the noise floor even further. Again, the OP will have to demo an external unit himself in order to determine whether there would be any justifiable gains in his setup, or not.


Note that modding the card can make the noise (and other performance) worse, unless you really know what you are doing. Cryo treatment, op-amp rolling, and other snake oil will not fix ground loops or other electrical problems that may be the cause of an abnormally high noise level. If you think the card is noisy, prove it with measurements, or at least a loopback recording of the line output playing a low level signal in 96 kHz/24-bit format (this would not reliably test for grounding issues with an external amplifier, though).
 
 
Feb 7, 2012 at 10:57 AM Post #38 of 84
Ground loops? Electrical problems? Opamp rolling as snake oil? New home under NEC 2005. Dedicated 20A circuit with a dedicated ground. High quality power accessories all around. There was never any hum, never any issues with noise in the first place. Have you even listened to an ST/STX and then compared that to the output from a decent external DAC? Try that first...
 
Feb 7, 2012 at 11:54 AM Post #39 of 84
The Xonar STX line output has inaudible level of noise if the card and the setup it is used in performs at its full potential, this has been verified with measurements. You cannot hear a -120 dB noise floor (relative to the 2 Vrms maximum output), except at volume levels that could damage hearing with a full scale signal. So, if you think the card is audibly "noisy", and it is not just imagined, then your system is probably degrading its performance in some way (it can happen, due to multiple reasons, and expensive "high quality power accessories" are by no means guaranteed to avoid all of them), which will not be fixed by cryo treatment or replacing op-amps.
Regarding op-amps, I have yet to see a reliable double-blind test that proves that differences between modern op-amps that have adequate specs for high quality audio applications, and are used properly (the stock chips on the STX probably meet both criteria), can actually be heard.
 
 
Feb 7, 2012 at 2:19 PM Post #40 of 84
There is no need to mention a -120dB noise floor, no need to question the efficacy of cryo treatment, or opamps. I understand and respect your position. But you need to consider the entire playback chain. It is very simple in my case: ST/STX S/PDIF out to DAC to balanced (XLR) out to monitors > ST/STX analog out via unbalanced (RCA) to monitors. I stopped racing based on proof specs (of which we are all privy to and aware of) and headed out to the track long ago in an effort to understand system synergy. Listen to an ST/STX and then compare what you hear to the output from a decent external DAC. Try that first...
 
Feb 7, 2012 at 2:23 PM Post #41 of 84
Is the Benchmark DAC1 a decent DAC in your eyes? It sounded like the Essence STX to me.
 
What are the specs of the equipment you prefer to the Essence STX?
 
Feb 7, 2012 at 2:41 PM Post #44 of 84
Quote:
In fact, the Benchmark DAC1 does indeed sound like the ST/STX! I have always thought that ASUS modeled the sonic signature of the ST/STX after Benchmark.


Yeah, neutrality 
confused.gif

 
I think that confirms you're looking for some sort of coloration in your gear.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top