MrGreen
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2009
- Posts
- 2,388
- Likes
- 67
Quote:
YASUBP
Quote:
Derogatory.
Quote:
Subjective.
Quote:
Derogatory and the implication here is technically incorrect. A well-mastered track with a headphone that is relatively neutral in frequency response but low in bass impact (and thus has a "tipped up" sound ala K701 - if we're going by the "no bass" argument, anyway) would result in an overly bassy presentation. The product of acix's work - whatever it may be - is not the result of the K701, but rather the result of his mastering.
I don't like misinformation. I've also reported you for the manner in which you address this man in your post in the hope you will eventually clean-up your act.
Not to mention that, if your profile is accurate, you have just made passing comments on headphones you have never even heard.
Good day, sir.
Quote:
I agree. Theres a huge element of marketing in the term "reference"
Quote:
huh???
Quote:
Yes they are. Well, a statement headphone I guess, but they certainly throw the "reference" pony around when talking about the HD800
Originally Posted by subtle /img/forum/go_quote.gif Words. |
YASUBP
Quote:
Originally Posted by subtle /img/forum/go_quote.gif First off, it's becoming clearer by the day that you either have an agenda, a hearing deficiency, or both. The only two headphones on your long winded list there that even hold a candle to the HD800 in terms of neutral tonal balance are the JH13 and 4070. All the others? Thanks for the laughs. |
Derogatory.
Quote:
Originally Posted by subtle /img/forum/go_quote.gif Second, the HD800 has no subwoofer like qualities, no piercing treble, and no "hocus pocus", unless of course paired with a less than average source and amplifier. |
Subjective.
Quote:
Originally Posted by subtle /img/forum/go_quote.gif Please go back to creating more bass deficient mixes with your K701/2. |
Derogatory and the implication here is technically incorrect. A well-mastered track with a headphone that is relatively neutral in frequency response but low in bass impact (and thus has a "tipped up" sound ala K701 - if we're going by the "no bass" argument, anyway) would result in an overly bassy presentation. The product of acix's work - whatever it may be - is not the result of the K701, but rather the result of his mastering.
I don't like misinformation. I've also reported you for the manner in which you address this man in your post in the hope you will eventually clean-up your act.
Not to mention that, if your profile is accurate, you have just made passing comments on headphones you have never even heard.
Good day, sir.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Graphicism /img/forum/go_quote.gif So are D5000, HD650 for that matter and they are most certainly not reference! I believe it's all marketing BS and some people are getting too carried away with it. |
I agree. Theres a huge element of marketing in the term "reference"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acix /img/forum/go_quote.gif There are members here who have bought the HD800 and the T1 and feel they have the best headphones out there, but they don't understand what they're hearing. |
huh???
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acix /img/forum/go_quote.gif Sennheisers not trying to sell them as a reference hps. So, why you insist? |
Yes they are. Well, a statement headphone I guess, but they certainly throw the "reference" pony around when talking about the HD800