jet_dee
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2005
- Posts
- 84
- Likes
- 0
I've been having a strange internal argument over this one:
I own two albums with Mars (the planets) by Holst on them, and to me one not only sounds faster (without actually being longer, more than 20-30 seconds at least) but also sounds worse!
To simplify matters:
Mars 1 from an Exciting Classics album by EMI sounds reasonable pace and also perfect instrumentally.
Mars 2 from Double Decca (holst & john williams star wars + cotk album) sounds too fast paced and also the instruments sound "compressed", e.g. the horns sound like a fart noise you'd expect from poor quality speakers.
Would anyone mind comparing to the two to reassure me that I'm not crazy? If you don't have them, PM me. Even samples of music are probably illegal today but we can work something out
I own two albums with Mars (the planets) by Holst on them, and to me one not only sounds faster (without actually being longer, more than 20-30 seconds at least) but also sounds worse!
To simplify matters:
Mars 1 from an Exciting Classics album by EMI sounds reasonable pace and also perfect instrumentally.
Mars 2 from Double Decca (holst & john williams star wars + cotk album) sounds too fast paced and also the instruments sound "compressed", e.g. the horns sound like a fart noise you'd expect from poor quality speakers.
Would anyone mind comparing to the two to reassure me that I'm not crazy? If you don't have them, PM me. Even samples of music are probably illegal today but we can work something out
