GSTom1
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2003
- Posts
- 815
- Likes
- 0
Quote:
So differences can occur with different version of an encoder? That explains it. I initially ripped and encoded some CDs using Lame 3.90. Months later, I re-ripped and re-encoded the same CDs again, but this time used Lame 3.93. The resulting mp3 files came out smaller this time, usually a half-MB or so. I guess they were able to streamline the way Lame encodes files.
Originally posted by blessingx No, not if you use the same encoder version and settings each time. It's basically math. LAME should come to the same conclusion, if asked the same question. |
So differences can occur with different version of an encoder? That explains it. I initially ripped and encoded some CDs using Lame 3.90. Months later, I re-ripped and re-encoded the same CDs again, but this time used Lame 3.93. The resulting mp3 files came out smaller this time, usually a half-MB or so. I guess they were able to streamline the way Lame encodes files.