DENAFRIPS Terminator: the King of R2R dac
Jul 1, 2019 at 4:17 PM Post #406 of 1,025
So you are saying that the new board could potentially have the USB performance on the same level as I2S?
Sentence has no logic as every input (except I2S) is internally connected with I2S. So all about DDC connected to I2S versus other inputs implementation...
 
Jul 1, 2019 at 7:27 PM Post #407 of 1,025
Sentence has no logic as every input (except I2S) is internally connected with I2S. So all about DDC connected to I2S versus other inputs implementation...
I am starting to feel rather like a babbling idiot here. I honestly still do not know what you mean here. If every input is connected to I2S wouldn't that imply that all inputs should sound the same? Anything other then USB, SPdif, Toslink, and Optics inputs are new to me. Perhaps someone would be willing to provide me a simplified explanation of what these things mean. It would be much appreciated. Thanks
 
Jul 1, 2019 at 7:37 PM Post #408 of 1,025
If every input is connected to I2S wouldn't that imply that all inputs should sound the same?

Dan,

Take a quick review of my previous post showing the old input architecture block diagram (post 102), where you can see that I2S signal is being send to DSP processing without further conversion due to input signal has conversion done already in DDC, but all other inputs require conversion process prior. It is a matter of DDC input conversion vs. DAC input conversion.

https://www.head-fi.org/threads/den...-king-of-r2r-dac.851085/page-27#post-15028115
 
Jul 7, 2019 at 1:50 AM Post #411 of 1,025
Can anyone chime in on how the Denafrips compares to another statement DAC like the Chord Dave? Very curious as I have a Dave on the way.

WilliamWykeham made a DAC comparison on the Raal earspeaker thread.

"DT (Denafrips Terminator) vs. Dave - this is where things get very interesting. In blind testing of high resolution classical, I liked the DT more than the Dave sans mscaler, but liked Dave with mscaler
more than the DT by itself. The sound of the mscaler with the Dave was just more lifelike; I heard more dimensionality and a rounder tone to each instrument. It was surprising to
me, however, how close the Dave and DT are, and how very different both sound from the Pavane.
One test I wish we had done is the DT with mscaler vs. Dave with mscaler. However, with string quartet music I find the mscaler to add a lot to the DT, making the sound rounder,
more full bodied, more enjoyable than direct to DT."


The review was the Terminator model before the new DSP upgrade.
 
Jul 7, 2019 at 2:25 AM Post #412 of 1,025
WilliamWykeham made a DAC comparison on the Raal earspeaker thread.

"DT (Denafrips Terminator) vs. Dave - this is where things get very interesting. In blind testing of high resolution classical, I liked the DT more than the Dave sans mscaler, but liked Dave with mscaler
more than the DT by itself. The sound of the mscaler with the Dave was just more lifelike; I heard more dimensionality and a rounder tone to each instrument. It was surprising to
me, however, how close the Dave and DT are, and how very different both sound from the Pavane.
One test I wish we had done is the DT with mscaler vs. Dave with mscaler. However, with string quartet music I find the mscaler to add a lot to the DT, making the sound rounder,
more full bodied, more enjoyable than direct to DT."


The review was the Terminator model before the new DSP upgrade.

That's encouraging :beyersmile:

Cheers,
Alvin @ Vinshine Audio
 
Jul 7, 2019 at 4:21 AM Post #413 of 1,025
during the past week, a friend of mine who owns the dave kept it with me to try it while he was away. he and a couple of other audiophile friend praised the chord sound to me which made me very intrigued. I have heard dave /dave + mscaler combo in their systems various times and I was impressed, mostly by dave + mscaler combo. I have experienced the dave also for short listening sessions in my system earlier few times. but I knew having the dave for a week of A/B vs my terminator would be the ultimate test. even though I'm not that good with audiophile terms/descriptions, I will try my best to covey what I have put my fingers on during this week.
briefly, my system (speakers - not headphone rig) consists of: furutech rhodium wall adapter - Audioquest hurricane HC power cord into titan audio unfiltered styx strip - 3 X audioquest firebird HC and source power cords feeding a gryphon diablo 300 integrated amp, aurender n10 server connected via Audioquest vodka to an asus 88U router, and denafrips terminator dac. digital signal from aurender via wel signature AES into terminator, analog signal from terminator via Audioquest Fire XLR to diablo 300. Audioquest firebird Zero speaker cables to KEF reference 5 speakers. all fuses in equipment and cables are SR blue fuses. in short, I like to believe my system is very transparent and its very easy to detect changes by swapping cables/components. I have had the terminator for more than a year now, and I listen to it mostly in NOS mode, which feels more dynamic and musical to me.
I switched to Dave for the first time - the immediate feel is its a notch or two brighter and more open / NOT a bright awful sound, but compared to terminator, its bright-er. it sounded cleaner/clearer lets say. I selected all kind of tracks that I would listen to, from classical/deep house/jazz/blues/rock even some pop. I had just listened to the same list of tracks on my terminator before I do the swap. the next thing I noticed is even though vocals are more clear and defined, they are less enjoyable, less "romantic" sounding. highs on dave sounded slightly more detailed, noticed few cymbals that sounded different on my terminator for sure, but without the ability to decide which sounded better. my "musical" experince is limited of sort, I don't play instruments or listen to live music that often to consider myself an expert, to be honest. then the next observation was; I noticed that with terminator, the music sounds flowing as its one body - with lots of details that is embedded in that unified body. with dave, which sounded a tad more detailed, it felt more distributed out in space but less "unified" as a whole in comparison to terminator. which presentation is more accurate? I don't know. which one I preferred? the terminator's. technically, the dave might be superior with its "most complicated digital filter algorithm etc", and it impresses. but did it make me feel closer to the music? that I want to keep going from one track to the next? in short, in my setup, with my cables (I like audioquest cables for being transparent, dead neutral, effortless with almost zero distortion, in my humble opinion), the dave sounded "soulless" in comparison to terminator, hugely capable, but no character if you know what I mean. I put the terminator back for few hours, switched again to dave and kept doing that for the past few days. more observations consisted that even I love the thunderous bass that terminators spits out, the bass in dave was something special. extended, with more detail. even felt slightly MORE in quantity as well, but not in its punch/solidity. it was softer. it doesn't bleed into mids by any means though. in general, dave will impress you at the first listen for sure. the amount of detail it spits, its accuracy, its speed, it sounds digital for sure but some of the best digital out there. but living with it for longer than couple of hours session, in my own case, made me less impressed. i stress on that being a personal feeling.
adding the m scaler, which I have not done during the past week test, but heard what it does to dave first hand multiple times, could change the game, makes the chord sound more "enjoyable". it immediately makes the sound warmer. BUT doesn't mask the impressive details coming out of dave, which is a good thing. it also makes the sound more musical, coherent and real. but that is much more money that DT. also more cables required for that (3 BNCs). good cables cost money.
long story short, I still have the dave for few more days. but is it playing in my system? no, its in my closet waiting to be collected. my terminator is back in the rack, and mind you, I still have not received my DSP upgrade yet. its just more pleasing to me, to my ears, in my system. I love how the music sounds out of it. even a non- audiophile friend who is into deep house, visiting me from time to time to listen, he choose the DT presentation/sound not even knowing what happened exactly when I paused to swap dacs. this confirms to me that at least in my setup, I should keep the terminator. mainly cause it sound like a whole body with soul, with bags of details embedded in it. I don't want to sound like a cliche, but it sounded more "analog". does it have less timbrel accuracy that dave? maybe. but I listen to enjoy. and I enjoyed things more with terminator.
if I had an m scaler during this week, would things have been different? maybe, who knows. it does really elevate the dave performance. gives its sound more "feelings" and emotional connection which lacks on its own, in my opinion.
in defense of the dave, my friends who own it say that my cables do NOT help making it sound at its best. they pick cables which has a hint of warmth to color the sound. does it work? probably yes, cause hearing the dave in their systems was more enjoyable than in my rig. but I like to feel that my cables are invisible without obvious coloration. my streamer/DAC/AMP are the ones to be adding flavor, not the cables.
one more thing to add, I believe terminator is way more sensitive to electricity condition/ power cord than dave. also more sensitive with digital input, so your mileage will vary. dave might be less prone to bad signal/bad power cord, even though they change its sound as well.
something I would love to try, is terminator with chord m scaler. I wish terminator had two BNCs that could work in tandom, but it doesn't. and the maximum is 192 khz on its single BNC, so not much "scaling" is possible. that vs dave's ability of 384 khz on each of its BNCs. with the new DSP update, we can use dual AES, which allows for 192 +192 bandwidth. but for that I will need some sort of BNC to AES adaptor to test with m scaler. I found some on the internet, but I'm skeptical that an adapter will hinder the sound quality. yet I'm curious to try.
in the end, its a matter of preference, and these are my PERSONAL findings. I shared them only because I always felt such comparison is rarely found in forums, which I prefer over reviews. there was a comparison done by audiobacon, few others, but I still wanted to experience that myself then share my own findings. hope its of help :)

note: during the actual test, I was removing DT and placing Dave on the rack - not on the floor as attached pictures show. these photos I took today, I re-connected the Dave temporarily as its owner wanted to listen to it in my setup before he takes it. cheers
20190707_161134.jpg
20190707_161148.jpg
20190707_161212.jpg
 
Last edited:
Jul 8, 2019 at 11:40 AM Post #415 of 1,025
Saleh, nice review and system, can't wait for all of us to get the new boards. Is it possible to use Chord's Mscaler dual BNC out into Termy's (new board) dual AES/EBU (with adapter)?


https://www.fullcompass.com/prod/011887-neutrik-na2mbnc-xlrm-to-bnc-adapter
I honestly don't know if it will work. but since I have a friend who owns an M scaler and he is as curious as me, I thought I could give it a try. all I need is to receive the new DSP (fingers crossed soon! @alvin1118 ) and two male XLR/AES to female BNC adapters :) if I end up trying this at some point and it works, I will update you here about it!
 
Jul 8, 2019 at 7:24 PM Post #416 of 1,025
For those of you with the new DSP have any of you tried it with and without an SU-1 or SU-6 yet and if so what are your impressions?
 
Jul 11, 2019 at 11:05 AM Post #417 of 1,025
Hello guys,

Thank you for your patience. Shipment has started but at a moderate speed.
Each DSP board goes through a 24hrs of burn in time as part of the QC procedure before it's certified as good-to-ship.

Please be sure that you will be receiving yours soon!

Many thanks.

Best,
Alvin @ Vinshine Audio
 
Jul 11, 2019 at 11:26 AM Post #418 of 1,025
i see audio quest fire xlr interconnects? nice i have em as well if so.
 
Jul 11, 2019 at 11:29 AM Post #419 of 1,025
frankly not upgrading but terminator is an r2r dac I'm watching. I found my antipodes server took the need away.
 
Jul 11, 2019 at 5:20 PM Post #420 of 1,025
Just found out about this dsp board. Right now I'm using a sotm streamer into a sotm to aes converter to Terminator. since aes input not changed with the new DSP and just fpga code I wonder how much of an upgrade I would get.

Anyone out there who had compared the old and new board ?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top